Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2901790.2901858acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Planning Adaptive Mobile Experiences When Wireframing

Published: 04 June 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Machine learning improves mobile user experience. Interestingly, envisioning apps with adaptive interfaces that reduce navigation and selection effort is not standard UX practice. When implementing an adaptive UI for our mobile transit app, we encountered a number of problems. Our original design did not log necessary information nor did it induce users to provide good labels. On reflection, we realized UX designers should identify and refine UI adaptions when sketching wireframes. To advance on this insight, we reviewed the interfaces of popular apps and extracted six design patterns where UI adaptation can improve in-app navigation. Next, we designed an exemplar set of wireframes, illustrating how UX designers might annotate their interaction flows to communicate planned adaptation and note the information (logs and labels) needed to make the desired inferences.

References

[1]
Gregory D. Abowd, Christopher G. Atkeson, Jason Hong, Sue Long, Rob Kooper, and Mike Pinkerton. 1997. Cyberguide: a mobile context-aware tour guide. Wireless Networks 3, 5: 421--433. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019194325861
[2]
Daniel Billsus, Clifford a Brunk, Craig Evans, Brian Gladish, and Michael Pazzani. 2002. Adaptive Interfaces for Ubiquitous Web Access. Communications of the ACM 45, 5: 34--38.
[3]
Jan O. Borchers. 2001. A pattern approach to interaction design. AI & Society 15, 4: 359--376. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF01206115
[4]
Robert Bridle and Eric McCreath. 2006. Inducing shortcuts on a mobile phone interface. Proceedings of the international conference on Intelligent user interfaces (IUI '06), 327. http://doi.org/10.1145/1111449.1111526
[5]
Dermot Browne. 2014. Adaptive User Interfaces. Elsevier.
[6]
John Brownlee. 2015. Apple Finally Learns AI Is The New UI. Retrieved December 25, 2015 from http://www.fastcodesign.com/3047199/applefinally-learns-ai-is-the-new-ui
[7]
Christian Crumlish and Erin Malone. 2009. Designing Social Interfaces: Principles, Patterns, and Practices for Improving the User Experience. "O'Reilly Media, Inc."
[8]
Razak Eun Lee, Young and Benbasat. 2003. Interface Design for Mobile Commerce. Communications of the ACM 46, 12: 48--52.
[9]
Leah Findlater and Krzysztof Z. Gajos. 2009. Design Space and Evaluation Graphical User Interfaces. AI Magazine, Höök 2000: 68--73. http://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v30i4.2268
[10]
Leah Findlater and Joanna McGrenere. 2008. Impact of screen size on performance, awareness, and user satisfaction with adaptive graphical user interfaces. Proceedings of the 26th SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: 1247--1256. http://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357249
[11]
Dan Frommer. 2015. These are the 25 most popular mobile apps in America. Retrieved January 17, 2016 from http://qz.com/481245/these-are-the-25most-popular-2015-mobile-apps-in-america/
[12]
Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Daniel S. Weld, and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2010. Automatically generating personalized user interfaces with Supple. Artificial Intelligence 174, 12--13: 910--950. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2010.05.005
[13]
Kz Gajos, Mary Czerwinski, Ds Tan, and Ds Weld. 2006. Exploring the design space for adaptive graphical user interfaces. Proceedings of Advanced visual interfaces: 201--208. http://doi.org/10.1145/1133265.1133306
[14]
Jason Hong. 2009. Usable Privacy and Security?: A Grand Challenge for HCI Usable Privacy and Security?: A Grand Challenge for HCI.
[15]
Steven Hoober and Eric Berkman. 2011. Designing Mobile Interfaces. "O'Reilly Media, Inc."
[16]
K. Höök. 2000. Steps to take before intelligent user interfaces become real. Interacting with Computers 12, 4: 409--426. http://doi.org/10.1016/S09535438(99)00006-5
[17]
Eric Horvitz. 1999. Principles of Mixed-Initiative User Interfaces. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '99). http://doi.org/10.1145/302979.303030
[18]
Natalia Juristo and Ana Moreno. 2008. Moving usability forward to the beginning of the software development process. Human Computer Interaction, Bass 1999.
[19]
Azam Khan, Lyn Bartram, Eli Blevis, Carl DiSalvo, Jon Froehlich, and Gordon Kurtenbach. 2011. CHI 2011 sustainability community invited panel. Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems CHI EA '11, ACM Press, 73. http://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979484
[20]
Cliff Kuang. 2013. Why a New Golden Age for UI Design Is Around the Corner. Wired Magazine
[21]
09. Retrieved December 28, 2015 from http://www.wired.com/2013/08/design-and-thedigital-world/ 21. Miroslav Kubat, Robert C. Holte, and Stan Matwin. Machine Learning for the Detection of Oil Spills in Satellite Radar Images. Machine Learning 30, 2--3: 195--215. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007452223027
[22]
Pat Langley. 1997. Machine Learning for Adaptive User Interfaces. In KI-97: Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Gerhard Brewka, Christopher Habel and Bernhard Nebel (eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 53--62. http://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63493-2
[23]
Pat Langley. 1999. User Modeling in Adaptive Interfaces. UM '99 Proceedings of the seventh international conference on User modeling, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., 357--370. Retrieved from http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=1 0.1.1.29.8715/nhttp://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.29.8715&rep=rep1&am p;type=pdf
[24]
Min Kyung Lee. 2013. Designing personalization in technology-based services. Retrieved January 9, 2016 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2575012
[25]
Henry Lieberman, Hugo Liu, Push Singh, and Barbara Barry. 2004. Beating Commons Sense into Interactive Applications. AI Magazine 25: 63--76.
[26]
Xiaolei Ma, Yao-Jan Wu, Yinhai Wang, Feng Chen, and Jianfeng Liu. 2013. Mining smart card data for transit riders' travel patterns. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 36, January 2016: 1--12. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2013.07.010
[27]
Sean M. McNee, John Riedl, and Joseph A. Konstan. 2006. Being accurate is not enough: How Accuracy Metrics have hurt Recommender Systems. CHI '06 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems CHI EA'06, ACM Press, 1097. http://doi.org/10.1145/1125451.1125659
[28]
Kyle Montague, Vicki L Hanson, and Andy Cobley. 2011. Adaptive Interfaces?: A Little Learning is a Dangerous Thing. In Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Design for All and eInclusion. 391--399. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21672-5_43
[29]
Issam El Naqa and Martin J. Murphy. 2015. What Is Machine Learning? In Machine Learning in Radiation Oncology, Issam El Naqa, Ruijiang Li and Martin J. Murphy (eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 3--11. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18305-3
[30]
D. Narayanan, J. Flinn, and M. Satyanarayanan. 2000. Using history to improve mobile application adaptation. Proceedings Third IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, December: 31--40. http://doi.org/10.1109/MCSA.2000.895379
[31]
Le T Nguyen, Heng-tze Cheng, Pang Wu, Senaka Buthpitiya, and Ying Zhang. 2012. PnLUM?: System for Prediction of Next Location for Users with Mobility.
[32]
Kayur Patel. 2010. Lowering the Barrier to Applying Machine Learning. Adjunct Proceedings of the 23Nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology: 355--358. http://doi.org/10.1145/1866218.1866222
[33]
Jenny Preece, Helen Sharp, and Yvonne Rogers. 2015. Interaction Design: Beyond HumanComputer Interaction. John Wiley & Sons.
[34]
Rudy Raymond, Takamitsu Sugiura, and Kota Tsubouchi. 2011. Location recommendation based on location history and spatio-temporal correlations for an on-demand bus system. Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems GIS '11, ACM Press, 377. http://doi.org/10.1145/2093973.2094027
[35]
Yvonne Rogers. 2006. Moving on from Weiser's Vision of Calm Computing: engaging UbiComp experiences. Ubicomp '06: 404--421. http://doi.org/10.1007/11853565_24
[36]
Brian J. Rosmaita. 2006. Accessibility first!: a new approach to web design. Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education SIGCSE '06, ACM Press, 270. http://doi.org/10.1145/1121341.1121426
[37]
Roland T. Rust and Tuck Siong Chung. 2006. Marketing Models of Service and Relationships. Marketing Science 25, 6: 560--580. http://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1050.0139
[38]
Emily Schwartzman. Designer's Toolkit: Prototyping Tools, Reviews and rankings to help you find the best prototyping tool for the job. Retrieved January 7, 2016 from http://www.cooper.com/prototyping-tools
[39]
Ahmed Seffah and Homa Javahery. 2005. Multiple User Interfaces: Cross-Platform Applications and Context-Aware Interfaces. John Wiley & Sons.
[40]
Ling Shao, Caifeng Shan, Jiebo Luo, and Minoru Etoh. 2010. Multimedia Interaction and Intelligent User Interfaces: Principles, Methods and Applications. Retrieved January 13, 2016 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1869926
[41]
Daniel Siewiorek, Asim Smailagic, Junichi Furukawa, et al. 2003. SenSay: A Context-Aware Mobile Phone. 248. Retrieved January 15, 2016 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=946249.946884
[42]
Jenifer Tidwell. 2010. Designing Interfaces. "O'Reilly Media, Inc."
[43]
Anthony Tomasic, John Zimmerman, Aaron Steinfeld, and Yun Huang. 2014. Motivating Contribution in a Participatory Sensing System via Quid-pro-quo. Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing.: 979--988. http://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531705
[44]
Daniel S. Weld, Corin Anderson, Pedro Domingos, et al. 2003. Automatically personalizing user interfaces. IJCAI'03 Proceedings of the 18th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1613--1619. Retrieved December 26, 2015 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1630659.1630944
[45]
John Zimmerman, Anthony Tomasic, Isaac Simmons, et al. 2007. Vio: a mixed-initiative approach to learning and automating procedural update tasks. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems CHI '07, ACM Press, 1445. http://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240843

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)PromptInfuser: How Tightly Coupling AI and UI Design Impacts Designers’ WorkflowsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661613(743-756)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Understanding the Dynamics in Creating Domain-Specific AI Design Guidelines: A Case Study of a Leading Digital Finance Company in South KoreaExtended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650759(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2023)MENTORVERSE: The Development and Assessment of a Cross-Platform Mentor Finder Using React JS and MongoDBEuropean Journal of Contemporary Education and E-Learning10.59324/ejceel.2023.1(2).041:2(33-44)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Planning Adaptive Mobile Experiences When Wireframing

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    DIS '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems
    June 2016
    1374 pages
    ISBN:9781450340311
    DOI:10.1145/2901790
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 04 June 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. design patterns
    2. interaction design
    3. mobile interfaces

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • JSPS KAKENHI

    Conference

    DIS '16
    Sponsor:
    DIS '16: Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2016
    June 4 - 8, 2016
    QLD, Brisbane, Australia

    Acceptance Rates

    DIS '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 107 of 418 submissions, 26%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,158 of 4,684 submissions, 25%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)390
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)132
    Reflects downloads up to 28 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)PromptInfuser: How Tightly Coupling AI and UI Design Impacts Designers’ WorkflowsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661613(743-756)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Understanding the Dynamics in Creating Domain-Specific AI Design Guidelines: A Case Study of a Leading Digital Finance Company in South KoreaExtended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650759(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2023)MENTORVERSE: The Development and Assessment of a Cross-Platform Mentor Finder Using React JS and MongoDBEuropean Journal of Contemporary Education and E-Learning10.59324/ejceel.2023.1(2).041:2(33-44)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2023
    • (2023)The Scenarios of Artificial Intelligence and Wireframes Implementation in Engineering EducationSustainability10.3390/su1508685015:8(6850)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2023)mHealth Apps Targeting Obesity and Overweight in Young People: App Review and AnalysisJMIR mHealth and uHealth10.2196/3771611(e37716)Online publication date: 19-Jan-2023
    • (2023)Understanding Design Collaboration Between Designers and Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Literature ReviewProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36102177:CSCW2(1-35)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2023
    • (2023)Data Driven UX/UI design for reproductive health tracker2023 IEEE International Students' Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Science (SCEECS)10.1109/SCEECS57921.2023.10063134(1-5)Online publication date: 18-Feb-2023
    • (2023)Towards the conceptual design of ML-enhanced products: the UX value framework and the CoMLUX design processArtificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing10.1017/S089006042200027037Online publication date: 30-Mar-2023
    • (2023)HELENAInformation Processing and Management: an International Journal10.1016/j.ipm.2022.10312460:1Online publication date: 20-Jan-2023
    • (2023)Design IndirectionsComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)10.1007/s10606-022-09459-yOnline publication date: 23-May-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media