Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2993148.2993149acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Do speech features for detecting cognitive load depend on specific languages?

Published: 31 October 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Speech-based cognitive load modeling recently proposed in English have enabled objective, quantitative and unobtrusive evaluation of cognitive load without extra equipment. However, no evidence indicates that these techniques could be applied to speech data in other languages without modification. In this study, a modified Stroop Test and a Reading Span Task were conducted to collect speech data in English and Chinese respectively, from which twenty non-linguistic features were extracted to investigate whether they were language dependent. Some discriminating speech features were observed language dependent, which serves as an evidence that there is a necessity to adapt speech-based cognitive load detection techniques to diverse language contexts for a higher performance.

References

[1]
Berthold, A. and Jameson, A. 1999. Interpreting symptoms of cognitive load in speech input. In UM99 User Modeling. J. Kay, ed. Springer Vienna. 235–244.
[2]
Boril, H., Omid Sadjadi, S., Kleinschmidt, T. and Hansen, J.H. 2010. Analysis and detection of cognitive load and frustration in drivers’ speech. In Proceedings of INTERSPEECH 2010 (2010), 502–505.
[3]
Campione, E. and Véronis, J. 2002. A large-scale multilingual study of silent pause duration. In Proceedings of the Speech Prosody 2002 Conference (Aix-en-Provence, 2002), 199–202.
[4]
Chandler, P. and Sweller, J. 1991. Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction. 8, 4 (Dec. 1991), 293–332.
[5]
Gorovoy, K., Tung, J. and Poupart, P. 2010. Automatic speech feature extraction for cognitive load classification. In Conference of the Canadian Medical and Biological Engineering Society (CMBEC) (2010).
[6]
Huttunen, K.H., Keränen, H.I., Pääkkönen, R.J., Päivikki Eskelinen-Rönkä, R. and Leino, T.K. 2011. Effect of cognitive load on articulation rate and formant frequencies during simulator flights. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 129, 3 (Mar. 2011), 1580–1593.
[7]
Ikehara, C.S. and Crosby, M.E. 2005. Assessing cognitive load with physiological sensors. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Jan. 2005), 295a–295a.
[8]
Jameson, A., Kiefer, J., Müller, C., Großmann-Hutter, B., Wittig, F. and Rummer, R. 2010. Assessment of a user’s time pressure and cognitive load on the basis of features of speech. In Resource-Adaptive Cognitive Processes. M.W. Crocker and J. Siekmann, eds. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 171–204.
[9]
Khawaja, M.A., Chen, F. and Marcus, N. 2014. Measuring cognitive load using linguistic features: implications for usability evaluation and adaptive interaction design. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 30, 5 (May 2014), 343–368.
[10]
Khawaja, M.A., Chen, F. and Marcus, N. 2010. Using language complexity to measure cognitive load for adaptive interaction design. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (New York, NY, USA, 2010), 333–336.
[11]
Khawaja, M.A., Chen, F., Owen, C. and Hickey, G. 2009. Cognitive load measurement from user’s linguistic speech features for adaptive interaction design. In Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2009. T. Gross, J. Gulliksen, P. Kotzé, L. Oestreicher, P. Palanque, R.O. Prates, and M. Winckler, eds. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 485–489.
[12]
Khawaja, M.A., Ruiz, N. and Chen, F. 2007. Potential speech features for cognitive load measurement. In Proceedings of the 19th Australasian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Entertaining User Interfaces (New York, NY, USA, 2007), 57–60.
[13]
Le, P.N., Ambikairajah, E., Epps, J., Sethu, V. and Choi, E.H. 2011. Investigation of spectral centroid features for cognitive load classification. Speech Communication. 53, 4 (2011), 540–551.
[14]
Lin, T., Xie, T., Chen, Y. and Tang, N. 2013. Automatic cognitive load evaluation using writing features: an exploratory study. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 43, 3 (May 2013), 210–217.
[15]
Müller, C., Großmann-Hutter, B., Jameson, A., Rummer, R. and Wittig, F. 2001. Recognizing time pressure and cognitive load on the basis of speech: an experimental study. In User Modeling 2001. M. Bauer, P.J. Gmytrasiewicz, and J. Vassileva, eds. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 24–33.
[16]
Paas, F., Tuovinen, J.E., Tabbers, H. and Gerven, P.W.M.V. 2003. Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist. 38, 1 (Mar. 2003), 63–71.
[17]
Pedersen, C., Togelius, J. and Yannakakis, G.N. 2010. Modeling player experience for content creation. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games. 2, 1 (Mar. 2010), 54–67.
[18]
Rothkrantz, L.J.M., Wiggers, P., Van Wees, J.-W.A. and Van Vark, R.J. 2004. Voice stress analysis. In Text, Speech and Dialogue. P. Sojka, I. Kopeček, and K. Pala, eds. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 449–456.
[19]
Ruiz, N., Feng, Q.Q., Taib, R., Handke, T. and Chen, F. 2010. Cognitive skills learning: pen input patterns in computer-based athlete training. In International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces and the Workshop on Machine Learning for Multimodal Interaction (New York, NY, USA, 2010), 41:1–41:4.
[20]
Shahnaz, C., Zhu, W. p and Ahmad, M.O. 2006. A new technique for the estimation of jitter and shimmer of voiced speech signal. In Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (May 2006), 2112–2115.
[21]
Slyh, R.E., Nelson, W.T. and Hansen, E.G. 1999. Analysis of mrate, shimmer, jitter, and F 0 contour features across stress and speaking style in the SUSAS database. In Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (Mar. 1999), 2091–2094.
[22]
Unsworth, N., Heitz, R.P., Schrock, J.C. and Engle, R.W. 2005. An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods. 37, 3 (Aug. 2005), 498–505.
[23]
Vizer, L.M., Zhou, L. and Sears, A. 2009. Automated stress detection using keystroke and linguistic features: an exploratory study. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 67, 10 (Oct. 2009), 870–886.
[24]
Yap, T.F. 2012. Speech production under cognitive load: effects and classification. Doctoral Thesis. University of New South Wales.
[25]
Yap, T.F., Epps, J., Ambikairajah, E. and Choi, E.H.C. 2011. Formant frequencies under cognitive load: effects and classification. EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process. 2011, (Jan. 2011), 1:1–1:11.
[26]
Yap, T.F., Epps, J., Choi, E.H.C. and Ambikairajah, E. 2010. Glottal features for speech-based cognitive load classification. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (Mar. 2010), 5234– 5237.
[27]
Yin, B. and Chen, F. 2007. Towards automatic cognitive load measurement from speech analysis. In Human-Computer Interaction. Interaction Design and Usability. J.A. Jacko, ed. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 1011–1020.
[28]
Yin, B., Chen, F., Ruiz, N. and Ambikairajah, E. 2008. Speech-based cognitive load monitoring system. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (Mar. 2008), 2041–2044.
[29]
Yin, B., Ruiz, N., Chen, F. and Ambikairajah, E. 2008. Investigating speech features and automatic measurement of cognitive load. In IEEE 10th Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (Oct. 2008), 988–993.
[30]
Yin, B., Ruiz, N., Chen, F. and Khawaja, M.A. 2007. Automatic cognitive load detection from speech features. In Proceedings of the 19th Australasian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Entertaining User Interfaces (New York, NY, USA, 2007), 249–255.
[31]
Zahorian, S.A. and Hu, H. 2008. A spectral/temporal method for robust fundamental frequency tracking. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 123, 6 (Jun. 2008), 4559– 4571.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Broadening the mind: how emerging neurotechnology is reshaping HCI and interactive system designi-com10.1515/icom-2024-000723:2(165-177)Online publication date: 23-May-2024
  • (2023)Human-centered Behavioral and Physiological SecurityProceedings of the 2023 New Security Paradigms Workshop10.1145/3633500.3633504(48-61)Online publication date: 18-Sep-2023
  • (2023)A Survey on Measuring Cognitive Workload in Human-Computer InteractionACM Computing Surveys10.1145/358227255:13s(1-39)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Do speech features for detecting cognitive load depend on specific languages?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ICMI '16: Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction
    October 2016
    605 pages
    ISBN:9781450345569
    DOI:10.1145/2993148
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 31 October 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Chinese
    2. Cognitive load
    3. English
    4. Stroop test
    5. dependency
    6. reading span task
    7. speech features

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • Science and Technology Supporting Program, Sichuan Province

    Conference

    ICMI '16
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 453 of 1,080 submissions, 42%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 13 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Broadening the mind: how emerging neurotechnology is reshaping HCI and interactive system designi-com10.1515/icom-2024-000723:2(165-177)Online publication date: 23-May-2024
    • (2023)Human-centered Behavioral and Physiological SecurityProceedings of the 2023 New Security Paradigms Workshop10.1145/3633500.3633504(48-61)Online publication date: 18-Sep-2023
    • (2023)A Survey on Measuring Cognitive Workload in Human-Computer InteractionACM Computing Surveys10.1145/358227255:13s(1-39)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2023
    • (2023)Influence of Cognitive Load on Voice Production: A Scoping ReviewJournal of Voice10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.08.024Online publication date: Sep-2023
    • (2022)Quantifying Cognitive Load from Voice using Transformer-Based Models and a Cross-Dataset Evaluation2022 21st IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA)10.1109/ICMLA55696.2022.00055(337-344)Online publication date: Dec-2022

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media