Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article
Open access

Improving Archaeologists’ Online Archive Experiences Through User-Centred Design

Published: 02 January 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Traditionally, the preservation of archaeological data has been limited by the cost of materials and the physical space required to store them, but for the last 20 years, increasing amounts of digital data have been generated and stored online. New techniques in digital photography and document scanning have dramatically increased the amount of data that can be retained in digital format, while at the same time reducing the physical cost of production and storage. Vast numbers of hand written notes, grey literature documents, images of assemblages, contexts, and artefacts have been made available online. However, accessing these repositories is not always straightforward. Superficial interaction design, sparsely populated metadata, and heterogeneous schemas may prevent users from working the data that they need within archaeological archives.
In this article, we present the work of the Digging into Archaeological Data and Image Search Metadata project (DADAISM), a multidisciplinary project that draws together the work of researchers from the fields of archaeology, interaction design, image processing and text mining to create an interactive system that supports archaeologists in their tasks in online archives. By adopting a user-centred approach with techniques grounded in contextual design, we identified the phases of archaeologists work in online archives, which are distinctive to this user group. The insights from this work drove the design and evaluation of an interactive system that successfully integrates content-based image based retrieval and improved metadata searching to deliver a positive user experience when working with online archives.

References

[1]
J. Arróspide and L. Salgado. 2013. Log-gabor filters for image-based vehicle verification. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 22, 6 (2013), 2286--2295.
[2]
M. Beaudouin-Lafon. 2000. Instrumental interaction: An interaction model for designing post-WIMP user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems -- CHI’00. ACM Press, 446--453.
[3]
M. Beaudouin-Lafon. 2004. Designing interaction, not interfaces. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces. 15--22.
[4]
M. Beaudouin-Lafon and W. E. Mackay. 2000. Reification, polymorphism and reuse: Three principles for designing visual interfaces. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces. 102--109.
[5]
L. Bernard, D. Ertlen, and D. Swartz. 2014. ArkeoGIS: Merging geographical and archaeological datas online. In Proceedings of 42nd Annual Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA’14). Archaeopress, 401--406.
[6]
M. Bron, M. de Rijke, J. van Gorp, A. Vishneuski, F. Nack, and S. de Leeuw. 2012. A subjunctive exploratory search interface to support media studies researchers. In Proceedings of the 35th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’12). ACM, 425--434.
[7]
M. Bron, J. van Gorp, and M. de Rijke. 2016. Media studies research in the data-driven age: How research questions evolve. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 67, 7 (July 2016), 1535--1554. (Online June 2, 2015.).
[8]
M. Bron, J. van Gorp, F. Nack, L. B. Baltussen, and M. de Rijke. 2013. Aggregated search interface preferences in multi-session search tasks. In Proceedings of the 36th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’13). ACM, 123--132.
[9]
A. Chalechale, A. Mertins, and G. Naghdy. 2004. Edge image description using angular radial partitioning. IEEE Proceedings on Vision, Image and Signal Processing 151, 2 (2004), 93--101.
[10]
J. C. Chapman. 2010. Observing users: An empirical analysis of user interaction with online finding aids. Journal of Archival Organization 8, 1 (February 2010), 4--30.
[11]
M. Charno, S. Jeffrey, C. Binding, D. Tudhope, and K. May. 2012. From the slope of enlightenment to the plateau of productivity: Developing linked data at the ADS. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference of Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA’12), Earl Graeme et al. (Eds.). Amsterdam University Press, 217--223.
[12]
A. F. Costa, G. Humpire-Mamani, and A. J. M. Traina. 2012. An efficient algorithm for fractal analysis of textures. In Proceedings of the 25th SIBGRAPI Conference on Graphics, Patterns and Images. IEEE Computer Society, 39--46.
[13]
M. Di Pierro. 2011. web2py for scientific applications. Computing in Science 8 Engineering 13, 2 (March 2011), 64--69.
[14]
A. Duplouy, V. Capozzoli, and A. Zambon. 2014. An inventory of Lucanian heritage. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA’14), F. Giligny, F. Djindjian, L. Costa, P. Moscati, and S. Robert (Eds.). Archaeopress, 333--340.
[15]
T. Elena, A. Katifori, C. Vassilakis, G. Lepouras, and C. Halatsis. 2010. Historical research in archives: User methodology and supporting tools. International Journal on Digital Libraries 11, 1 (March 2010), 25--36.
[16]
D. Ellis and M. Haugan. 1997. Modelling the information seeking patterns of engineers and research scientists in an industrial environment. Journal of Documentation 53, 4 (October 1997), 384--403.
[17]
Z. Guo, Z. Zhang, X. Li, Q. Li, and J. You. 2014. Texture classification by texton: Statistical versus binary. PLoS ONE 9, 2 (2014), e88073.
[18]
H. R. Hartson and J. C. Castillo. 1998. Remote evaluation for post-deployment usability improvement. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI’98). ACM Press.
[19]
K. Holtzblatt. 2009. Contextual design. In Human-Computer Interaction: Development Process. CRC Press.
[20]
K. Holtzblatt and S. Jones. 1993. Contextual inquiry: A participatory technique for system design. In Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. 177--210.
[21]
I. Huvila. 2007. To whom it may concern? The users and uses of digital archaeological information. In Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA 2007), Axel Posluschny, Karsten Lambers, and Irmela Herzog (Eds.). Archaeopress, 1--8.
[22]
S. Jeffrey, W. Kilbride, S. Waller, and J. Richards. 2007. Thinking outside the search box: The common information environment and archaeobrowser. In Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA’07), Axel Posluschny, Karsten Lambers, and Irmela Herzog (Eds.). Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH, 2006--2011.
[23]
S. Jeffrey, J. Richards, F. Ciravegna, S. Waller, S. Chapman, and Z. Zhang. 2009. The archaeotools project: Faceted classification and natural language processing in an archaeological context. Philosophical Transactions: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 367, 1897 (2009), 2507--2519.
[24]
G. Klein, B. Moon, and R. R. Hoffman. 2006a. Making sense of sensemaking 1: Alternative perspectives. IEEE Intelligent Systems 21, 4 (2006), 70--73.
[25]
G. Klein, B. Moon, and R. R. Hoffman. 2006b. Making sense of sensemaking 2: A macrocognitive model. IEEE Intelligent Systems 21, 5 (2006), 88--92.
[26]
P. Kovesi. 2000. Phase congruency: A low-level image invariant. Psychological Research 64, 2 (2000), 136--148.
[27]
T. Lavie and N. Tractinsky. 2004. Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. International Journal of Human-computer Studies 60, 3 (2004), 269--298.
[28]
B. S. Manjunath and W.-Y. Ma. 1996. Texture features for browsing and retrieval of image data. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 18, 8 (1996), 837--842.
[29]
G. Marchionini. 2006. Exploratory search. Communications of the ACM 49, 4 (April 2006), 41.
[30]
D. Nadeau and S. Sekine. 2007. A survey of named entity recognition and classification. Lingvisticae Investigationes 30, 1 (2007), 3--26.
[31]
D. Nahl and V. H. Harada. 1996. Composing boolean search statements: Self-confidence, concept analysis, search logic, and errors. School Library Media Quarterly 24, 4 (1996), 199--207.
[32]
M. B. Rosson and J. M. Carroll. 2009. Scenario based design. In Human-computer Interaction, Andrew Sears and Julie A. Jacko (Eds.). CRC Press, 145--162.
[33]
A. Serenko and O. Turel. 2010. Rigor and relevance: The application of the critical incident technique to investigate email usage. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 20, 2 (April 2010), 182--207.
[34]
D. Sinn. 2012. Impact of digital archival collections on historical research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63, 8 (August 2012), 1521--1537.
[35]
C. Sutton and A. McCallum. 2006. An introduction to conditional random fields for relational learning. In Introduction to Statistical Relational Learning. 93--128.
[36]
M. Topi, O. Timo, P. Matti, and S. Maricor. 2000. Robust texture classification by subsets of local binary patterns. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. 935--938.
[37]
M. Van Den Haak, M. De Jong, and P. J. Schellens. 2003. Retrospective vs. concurrent think-aloud protocols: Testing the usability of an online library catalogue. Behaviour 8 Information Technology 22, 5 (2003), 339--351.
[38]
C. Zhu, C.-E. Bichot, and L. Chen. 2013. Image region description using orthogonal combination of local binary patterns enhanced with color information. Pattern Recognition 46, 7 (2013), 1949--1963.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Integrated Information System for 3D Interactive Reconstruction of an Archaeological SiteJournal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 10.1145/358607716:3(1-23)Online publication date: 9-Aug-2023
  • (2022)Improving the usefulness of research data with better paradataOpen Information Science10.1515/opis-2022-01296:1(28-48)Online publication date: 18-Apr-2022
  • (2022)Accessing interactively the spatio-temporal data-model of an archaeological site through its 3D virtual reconstructionDigital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage10.1016/j.daach.2022.e0023526(e00235)Online publication date: Sep-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Improving Archaeologists’ Online Archive Experiences Through User-Centred Design

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage
      Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage   Volume 10, Issue 1
      Special Issue on Digital Infrastructure for Cultural Heritage, Part 1
      April 2017
      131 pages
      ISSN:1556-4673
      EISSN:1556-4711
      DOI:10.1145/3034773
      Issue’s Table of Contents
      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike International 4.0 License.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 02 January 2017
      Accepted: 01 August 2016
      Received: 01 April 2016
      Published in JOCCH Volume 10, Issue 1

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Archival search
      2. archaeological information
      3. content-based image retrieval
      4. exploratory search and discovery
      5. feature fusion
      6. instrumental interaction
      7. texture description
      8. user-centred design

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

      Funding Sources

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)151
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)26
      Reflects downloads up to 09 Nov 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2023)Integrated Information System for 3D Interactive Reconstruction of an Archaeological SiteJournal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 10.1145/358607716:3(1-23)Online publication date: 9-Aug-2023
      • (2022)Improving the usefulness of research data with better paradataOpen Information Science10.1515/opis-2022-01296:1(28-48)Online publication date: 18-Apr-2022
      • (2022)Accessing interactively the spatio-temporal data-model of an archaeological site through its 3D virtual reconstructionDigital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage10.1016/j.daach.2022.e0023526(e00235)Online publication date: Sep-2022
      • (2021)Digital Web Archive Collection Framework Based on Intelligent Management Information System and Optimization2021 5th International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems (ICICCS)10.1109/ICICCS51141.2021.9432158(1-4)Online publication date: 6-May-2021
      • (2021)Ethical considerations for remote sensing and open data in relation to the endangered archaeology in the Middle East and North Africa projectArchaeological Prospection10.1002/arp.181628:3(279-292)Online publication date: 24-Mar-2021
      • (2020)Methods and Practices for Assessing the User Experience of Interactive Systems for Cultural HeritageApplying Innovative Technologies in Heritage Science10.4018/978-1-7998-2871-6.ch009(171-208)Online publication date: 2020
      • (2020)Developing the ArchAIDE application: A digital workflow for identifying, organising and sharing archaeological pottery using automated image recognitionInternet Archaeology10.11141/ia.52.7Online publication date: 2020
      • (2020)Leveraging digital forensics and data exploration to understand the creative work of a filmmaker: A case study of Stephen Dwoskin's digital archiveInformation Processing & Management10.1016/j.ipm.2020.10233957:6(102339)Online publication date: Nov-2020
      • (2019)Computer vision and image recognition in archaeologyProceedings of the Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Data Discovery and Reuse10.1145/3359115.3359117(1-4)Online publication date: 13-May-2019
      • (2019)Adapting Jake Knapp’s Design Sprint Approach for AR/VR Applications in Digital HeritageAugmented Reality and Virtual Reality10.1007/978-3-030-06246-0_5(59-70)Online publication date: 20-Feb-2019
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Get Access

      Login options

      Full Access

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media