Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2835776.2835790acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswsdmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

How Relevant is the Irrelevant Data: Leveraging the Tagging Data for a Learning-to-Rank Model

Published: 08 February 2016 Publication History

Abstract

For the task of tag-based item recommendations, the underlying tensor model faces several challenges such as high data sparsity and inferring latent factors effectively. To overcome the inherent sparsity issue of tensor models, we propose the graded-relevance interpretation scheme that leverages the tagging data effectively. Unlike the existing schemes, the graded-relevance scheme interprets the tagging data richly, differentiates the non-observed tagging data insightfully, and annotates each entry as one of the "relevant", "likely relevant", "irrelevant", or "indecisive" labels. To infer the latent factors of tensor models correctly to produce the high quality recommendation, we develop a novel learning-to-rank method, Go-Rank, that optimizes Graded Average Precision (GAP). Evaluating the proposed method on real-world datasets, we show that the proposed interpretation scheme produces a denser tensor model by revealing "relevant" entries from the previously assumed "irrelevant" entries. Optimizing GAP as the ranking metric, the quality of the recommendations generated by Go-Rank is found superior against the benchmarking methods.

References

[1]
Kim, H.-N., Ji, A.-T., Ha, I., and Jo, G.-S., Collaborative Filtering based on Collaborative Tagging for Enhancing the Quality of Recommendation. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(1): 73--83, 2010.
[2]
Kolda, T. and Bader, B., Tensor Decompositions and Applications. SIAM Review, 51(3): 455--500, 2009.
[3]
Ifada, N. and Nayak, R., A Two-Stage Item Recommendation Method Using Probabilistic Ranking with Reconstructed Tensor Model. In User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, pages 98--110, Springer, 2014.
[4]
Symeonidis, P., Nanopoulos, A., and Manolopoulos, Y., A Unified Framework for Providing Recommendations in Social Tagging Systems Based on Ternary Semantic Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 22(2): 179--192, 2010.
[5]
Rendle, S., Balby Marinho, L., Nanopoulos, A., and Schmidt-Thieme, L. Learning Optimal Ranking with Tensor Factorization for Tag Recommendation. In Proceedings of The 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 727--736, Paris, France, 2009.
[6]
Rafailidis, D. and Daras, P., The TFC Model: Tensor Factorization and Tag Clustering for Item Recommendation in Social Tagging Systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 43(3): 673--688, 2013.
[7]
Leginus, M., Dolog, P., and Žemaitis, V., Improving Tensor Based Recommenders with Clustering. In User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, pages 151--163, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012.
[8]
Ifada, N. and Nayak, R. An Efficient Tagging Data Interpretation and Representation Scheme for Item Recommendation. In Proceedings of The 12th Australasian Data Mining Conference, Brisbane, Australia, 2014.
[9]
Cremonesi, P., Koren, Y., and Turrin, R. Performance of Recommender Algorithms on Top-N Recommendation Tasks. In Proceedings of The 4th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pages 39--46, Barcelona, Spain, 2010.
[10]
Chapelle, O. and Wu, M., Gradient Descent Optimization of Smoothed Information Retrieval Metrics. Information Retrieval, 13(3): 216--235, 2010.
[11]
Xu, J. and Li, H. AdaRank: A Boosting Algorithm for Information Retrieval. In Proceedings of The 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 391--398, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007.
[12]
Shi, Y., Karatzoglou, A., Baltrunas, L., Larson, M., Hanjalic, A., and Oliver, N. TFMAP: Optimizing MAP for Top-N Context-Aware Recommendation. In Proceedings of The 35th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 155--164, Portland, Oregon, USA, 2012.
[13]
Shi, Y., Karatzoglou, A., Baltrunas, L., Larson, M., Oliver, N., and Hanjalic, A. CLiMF: Learning to Maximize Reciprocal Rank with Collaborative Less-is-More Filtering. In Proceedings of The 6th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pages 139--146, Dublin, Ireland, 2012.
[14]
Robertson, S.E., Kanoulas, E., and Yilmaz, E. Extending Average Precision to Graded Relevance Judgments. In Proceedings of The 33rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 603--610, Geneva, Switzerland, 2010.
[15]
Nanopoulos, A., Item Recommendation in Collaborative Tagging Systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 41(4): 760--771, 2011.
[16]
Ifada, N. and Nayak, R., Do-Rank: DCG Optimization for Learning-to-Rank in Tag-Based Item Recommendation Systems. In Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 510--521, Springer, 2015.
[17]
Rendle, S. and Schmidt-Thieme, L. Pairwise Interaction Tensor Factorization for Personalized Tag Recommendation. In Proceedings of The 3rd ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pages 81--90, New York, USA, 2010.
[18]
Weimer, M., Karatzoglou, A., Le, Q.V., and Smola, A., Maximum Margin Matrix Factorization for Collaborative Ranking. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2007.
[19]
Shi, Y., Karatzoglou, A., Baltrunas, L., Larson, M., and Hanjalic, A. GAPfm: Optimal Top-N Recommendations for Graded Relevance Domains. In Proceedings of The 22nd ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, pages 2261--2266, San Francisco, California, USA, 2013.
[20]
Balakrishnan, S. and Chopra, S. Collaborative Ranking. In Proceedings of The 5th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pages 143--152, Seattle, Washington, USA, 2012.
[21]
Wu, M., Chang, Y., Zheng, Z., and Zha, H. Smoothing DCG for Learning to Rank: A Novel Approach using Smoothed Hinge Functions. In Proceedings of The 18th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pages 1923--1926, Hong Kong, China, 2009.
[22]
Cantador, I., Brusilovsky, P., and Kuflik, T. Second Workshop on Information Heterogeneity and Fusion in Recommender Systems (HetRec2011). In Proceedings of The 5th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pages 387--388, Chicago, Illinois, USA, 2011.
[23]
Doerfel, S. and Jäschke, R. An Analysis of Tag-recommender Evaluation Procedures. In Proceedings of The 7th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pages 343--346, 2013.
[24]
Batagelj, V. and Zaveršnik, M. Generalized Cores. arXiv preprint cs/0202039, 2002.
[25]
Shi, Y., Karatzoglou, A., Baltrunas, L., Larson, M., and Hanjalic, A. xCLiMF: Optimizing Expected Reciprocal Rank for Data with Multiple Levels of Relevance. In Proceedings of The 7th ACM conference on Recommender Systems, pages 431--434, Hong Kong, China, 2013.

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)Efficient Nonnegative Tensor Factorization via Saturating Coordinate DescentACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data10.1145/338565414:4(1-28)Online publication date: 30-May-2020
  • (2020)Collaborative Filtering Item Recommendation Methods based on Matrix Factorization and Clustering Approaches2020 10th Electrical Power, Electronics, Communications, Controls and Informatics Seminar (EECCIS)10.1109/EECCIS49483.2020.9263450(226-230)Online publication date: 26-Aug-2020
  • (2019)An Efficient Scheme to Combine the User Demographics and Item Attribute for Solving Data Sparsity and Cold-start Problems2019 3rd International Conference on Informatics and Computational Sciences (ICICoS)10.1109/ICICoS48119.2019.8982394(1-6)Online publication date: Oct-2019
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. How Relevant is the Irrelevant Data: Leveraging the Tagging Data for a Learning-to-Rank Model

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      WSDM '16: Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining
      February 2016
      746 pages
      ISBN:9781450337168
      DOI:10.1145/2835776
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 08 February 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. graded average precision
      2. graded-relevance scheme
      3. item recommendation
      4. tagging data

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      WSDM 2016
      WSDM 2016: Ninth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining
      February 22 - 25, 2016
      California, San Francisco, USA

      Acceptance Rates

      WSDM '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 67 of 368 submissions, 18%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 498 of 2,863 submissions, 17%

      Upcoming Conference

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
      Reflects downloads up to 24 Sep 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2020)Efficient Nonnegative Tensor Factorization via Saturating Coordinate DescentACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data10.1145/338565414:4(1-28)Online publication date: 30-May-2020
      • (2020)Collaborative Filtering Item Recommendation Methods based on Matrix Factorization and Clustering Approaches2020 10th Electrical Power, Electronics, Communications, Controls and Informatics Seminar (EECCIS)10.1109/EECCIS49483.2020.9263450(226-230)Online publication date: 26-Aug-2020
      • (2019)An Efficient Scheme to Combine the User Demographics and Item Attribute for Solving Data Sparsity and Cold-start Problems2019 3rd International Conference on Informatics and Computational Sciences (ICICoS)10.1109/ICICoS48119.2019.8982394(1-6)Online publication date: Oct-2019
      • (2019)Enhancing the Performance of Library Book Recommendation System by Employing the Probabilistic-Keyword Model on a Collaborative Filtering ApproachProcedia Computer Science10.1016/j.procs.2019.08.176157(345-352)Online publication date: 2019
      • (2017)Learning to rank using multiple loss functionsInternational Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics10.1007/s13042-017-0730-4Online publication date: 12-Oct-2017
      • (2017)Mining tag-clouds to improve social media recommendationMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-016-4039-176:20(21157-21170)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2017

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media