Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2818869.2818872acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesase-bigdataConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A patent quality classification model based on artificial immune system

Published: 07 October 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Patents for companies are potentially a business and financial asset which can place competitors' development, thus patent analysis is important of defining business strategies and supporting decision making in organizations. However, patent information is consisted of vast data sets of information. Therefore, the main propose of this study is to apply an artificial immune system (AIS) hybrid collaborative filtering to build a patent quality classification model to predict patent quality of RFID industry. We defined each patent data as an antibody, then compute the affinities of the target patent to all immune networks. If the affinity is larger than the given threshold, the antibody was cloned to the related immune network. After immune networks constructed, the quality of target patent was predicted by the immune networks which with high affinity to the target patent. Finally, a series of experiments are conducted, and the results the proposed model can accurately predict the quality of new patent. By this study, we can provide an automatic patent quality classification model to assist manufacturers to provide excellent sight into a company's product direction and long-term vision.

References

[1]
Trappey, A. J. C., Trappey, C. V., Wu, C. Y. and Lin, C. L. 2012. A patent quality analysis for innovative technology and product development. Adv Eng Inform. 26, 26--34.
[2]
Trappey, A. J. C., Trappey, C. V., Wu, C. Y. W., Fan, C. Y. and Lin, Y. L. 2013. Intelligent patent recommendation system for Innovative design collaboration. Journal of Network and Computer Applications. 36, 1441--1450.
[3]
Abbas, A., Zhang, L. and Khan, S. U. 2014. A literature review on the state-of-the-art in patent analysis. World Patent Information. 37, 3--13.
[4]
Segev, A. and Kantola, J. 2012. Identification of trends from patents using self-organizing maps. Expert Syst Appl. 39, 18, 13235--13242.
[5]
Hajek, P., Henriques, R. and Hajkova, V. 2014. Visualising components of regional innovation systems using self-organizing maps---Evidence from European regions. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 84, 197--214.
[6]
Ercan, S. and Kayakutlu, G. 2014. Patent value analysis using support vector machines. Soft Computing. 18, 313--328.
[7]
Archontopoulos, E. 2004. Prior art search tools on the Internet and legal status of the results: a European Patent Office perspective. World Patent Information. 26, 2, 113--121.
[8]
Simmons, E. S. and Spahl, B. D. 2000. Of submarines and interference: legal status changes following citation of an earlier US patent or patent application under 35 USC §102 (e). World Patent Information. 22, 3, 191--203.
[9]
Dang, J. and Motohashi, K. 2015. Patent statistics: A good indicator for innovation in China? Patent subsidy program impacts on patent quality. China Economic Review. Article in press.
[10]
Acilar, A. M., Arslan, A. 2009. A cllaborative fltering method bsed on artificial immune network. Expert Systems with Applications. 36, 8324--8332.
[11]
Cayzer, S., Aickelin, U. 2005. A recommender system based on idiotypic artificial immune networks. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Algorithms. 4, 2, 181--198.
[12]
Jerne, N. K. 1974. Towards a network theory of the immune system. Ann Immunol (Paris). 125C(1-2), 373--389.
[13]
Dasgupta, D., Ji, Z. and Gonzalez, F. 2003. Artificial immune systems research in the last five years.in: Proceedings of the Congress on Evolutionary Computation Conference, Canberra, 8--12.
[14]
Alatas, B., Akin, E. 2005. Mining fuzzy classification rules using an artificial immune system with boosting. Advances in Databases and Information Systems. 3631, 283--293.
[15]
Resnick, P., Iacovou, N., Suchak, M., Bergstrom, P. and Riedl, J. 1994. Grouplens: an open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'94). ACM, New York, NY, 175--186.
[16]
Shardanand, U., Maes, P. 1995. Social information filtering: algorithms for automating "word of mouth".in: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'95), 210--217.
[17]
Herlocker, J. L., Konstan, J. A., Borchers, A. and Riedl, J. 1999. An algorithmic framework for performing collaborative filtering.in: Proceedings of the Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 230--237.
[18]
Breese, J. S., Heckerman, D. and Kadie, C. 1998. Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering.in: Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 43--52.
[19]
Ahn, H. J. 2008. A new similarity measure for collaborative filtering to alleviate the new user cold-starting problem. Information Science. 178(1), 37--51.
[20]
Liu, H., Hu, Z., Mian, A., Tian, H. and Zhu, Z. 2014. A new user similarity model to improve the accuracy of collaborative filtering. Knowledge-Based Systems. 56, 156--166.
[21]
Shardanand, U. 1994. Social information filtering for music recommendation, M. S. thesis. Massachussets Institute of Technology.
[22]
Sarwar, B., Karypis, G., Konstan, J. and Riedl, J. 2001. Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms.in: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web, 285--295.
[23]
Sarwar, B., Karypis, G., Konstan, J. and Ridel, J. 2000. Application of dimensionality reduction in recommender systems--a case study.in: Proceedings of the ACM WebKDD Workshop.
[24]
Canny, J. 2002. Collaborative filtering with privacy via factor analysis.in: Proceedings of the 25th Annual International ACMSIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR'02), 238--245.
[25]
Billsus, D., Pazzani, M. J. 1998. Learning collaborative information filters.in: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Machine Learning. (1998), pp. 46--54.
[26]
Goldberg, K., Roeder, T., Gupta, D. and Perkins, C. 2001. Eigentaste: A constant time collaborative filtering algorithm. Information Retrieval. 4(2) (2001) 133--151.
[27]
Hofmann, T. 2004. Latent semantic models for collaborative filtering. ACM Transactions on Information Systems. 22, 1, 89--115.
[28]
Langseth, H. and Nielsen, T. D. 2012. A latent model for collaborative filtering. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 53, 4, 447--466.
[29]
Chen, M. H., Teng, C. H. and Chang, P. C. 2014. Applying artificial immune systems to collaborative filtering for movie recommendation.
[30]
Pearson, K. 1895. Notes on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents.in: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. 58,240--242.
[31]
Reitzig, M. 2004. Improving patent valuations for management purposes-Validating new indicators by analyzing application rationales. Research Policy. 33, 6-7, 939--957.
[32]
Trajtenberg, M. 1990. A penny for your quotes-Patent citations and the value of innovations. The RAND Journal of Economics. 21, 1, 172--187.
[33]
Lee, Y. G. 2009. What affects a patent's value? An analysis of variables that affect technological, direct economic, and indirect economic value: An exploratory conceptual approach. Scientometrics. 79, 3, 623--633.
[34]
Suzuki, J. 2011. Structural modeling of the value of patent. Research Policy. 40, 7, 986--1000.
[35]
Schubert, T. 2011. Assessing the value of patent portfolios: an international country comparison. Scientometrics. 88, 3, 787--804.
[36]
Wang, X., Zhao, Y., Zhang, J. and Zhao, P. 2014. Patent portfolio analysis model based on legal status information.A Peer-reviewed iInternational Scholarty Journal. 7, 1, 69--82.
[37]
Li, C. Y. and Shi, R. 2008. Evaluation of patent quality indexes. Modern Information (in Chinese), 28,2.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ASE BD&SI '15: Proceedings of the ASE BigData & SocialInformatics 2015
October 2015
381 pages
ISBN:9781450337359
DOI:10.1145/2818869
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 October 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Artificial Immune System
  2. Big Data
  3. Collaborative Filtering
  4. Patent Quality Classification
  5. Pearson Correlation Coefficient

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

ASE BD&SI '15
ASE BD&SI '15: ASE BigData & SocialInformatics 2015
October 7 - 9, 2015
Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 129
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 19 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media