Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2814864.2814868acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessemanticsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A semantic method for multiple resources exploitation

Published: 16 September 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Being able to extract and exploit information that is included in multiple resources (repositories, corpora, etc.) is essential to benefiting from the increasing availability and complementary nature of such data scattered across the World Wide Web. However, such an endeavour raises a number of challenges including dealing with the diverse structures of such resources, different relationships among such data, and the overlapping and complementary nature of the information. Thus, developing a semantic method that can extract semantic information and hidden associations would help overcome such difficulties that occur when dealing with multiple resources. This paper presents a new semantic method that exploits the overlap between various resources with different structures (i.e. ontologies as forms of structured data and corpora as examples of unstructured data) and employs semantic relations, specifically sibling relations, to infer new information that may not exist in the original resources. Then, this method employs the new information in a content-based recommender system to enhance the quality of the provided recommendations (i.e. articles) in complex fields that are inherently characterised by varying relations and structures, such as bioinformatics. In addition, this method is accompanied by an automatic tool that is responsible for tailoring individual recommendations to each user based on his/her profile.

References

[1]
R. Baeza-Yates and B. Ribeiro-Neto. Modern Information Retrieval. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, USA, 2nd edition, 2008.
[2]
T. Bogers and A. van den Bosch. Recommending scientific articles using citeulike. In RecSys'08, pages 287--290, 2008.
[3]
P. Borlund. The iir evaluation model: a framework for evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. Information research, 8(3), 2003.
[4]
T. Di Noia, R. Mirizzi, V. C. Ostuni, D. Romito, and M. Zanker. Linked open data to support content-based recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Semantic Systems, I-SEMANTICS'12, pages 1--8. ACM, 2012.
[5]
E. W. Dijkstra. A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische mathematik, 1(1):269--271, 1959.
[6]
L. Ding, P. Kolari, Z. Ding, and S. Avancha. Using ontologies in the semantic web: A survey. In Ontologies, pages 79--113. Springer, 2007.
[7]
S. Dooms, T. De Pessemier, and L. Martens. A user-centric evaluation of recommender algorithms for an event recommendation system. In Workshop on Human Decision Making in RecSys'11, pages 67--73, 2011.
[8]
Z. Gantner, S. Rendle, C. Freudenthaler, and L. Schmidt-Thieme. Mymedialite: A free recommender system library. In Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems, pages 305--308. ACM, 2011.
[9]
B. P. Knijnenburg, M. C. Willemsen, and A. Kobsa. A pragmatic procedure to support the user-centric evaluation of recommender systems. In RecSys'11, pages 321--324. ACM, 2011.
[10]
C. Liu, R. W. White, and S. Dumais. Understanding web browsing behaviors through weibull analysis of dwell time. In Proceedings of SIGIR'10, pages 379--386. ACM, 2010.
[11]
D. L. McGuinness, F. Van Harmelen, et al. OWL web ontology language overview. W3C recommendation, 10(2004-03), 2004.
[12]
M. Mezghani, C. A. Zayani, I. Amous, and F. Gargouri. A user profile modelling using social annotations: a survey. In WWW'12, pages 969--976, 2012.
[13]
S. E. Middleton, D. De Roure, and N. R. Shadbolt. Ontology-based recommender systems. In Handbook on ontologies, pages 779--796. Springer, 2009.
[14]
E. Miller. An introduction to the resource description framework. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 1998.
[15]
R. Mirizzi, T. Di Noia, V. C. Ostuni, and A. Ragone. Linked open data for content-based recommender systems. Technical report, http://sisinflab.poliba.it/semantic-expert-finding/papers/tech-report-1-2012.pdf, 2012.
[16]
G. Salton, A. Wong, and C. S. Yang. A vector space model for automatic indexing. Commun. ACM, 18(11):613--620, 1975.
[17]
H. Stuckenschmidt and A. Schlicht. Structure-based partitioning of large ontologies. In Modular Ontologies, pages 187--210. Springer, 2009.
[18]
L. Tari, N. Vo, S. Liang, J. Patel, C. Baral, and J. Cai. Identifying novel drug indications through automated reasoning. PloS one, 7(7):e40946, 2012.
[19]
J. Trajkova and S. Gauch. Improving ontology-based user profiles. PhD thesis, University of Kansas, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2003.
[20]
T. Yoneya and H. Mamitsuka. Pure: a article recommendation system based on content-based filtering. In Genome informatics., volume 18, pages 267--276, 2007.

Cited By

View all
  • (2017)Semantic User Profiles: Learning Scholars’ Competences by Analyzing Their PublicationsSemantics, Analytics, Visualization. Enhancing Scholarly Data10.1007/978-3-319-53637-8_12(113-130)Online publication date: 10-May-2017

Index Terms

  1. A semantic method for multiple resources exploitation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    SEMANTICS '15: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Semantic Systems
    September 2015
    220 pages
    ISBN:9781450334624
    DOI:10.1145/2814864
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 16 September 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. personalisation and bioinformatics
    2. recommendations
    3. semantic web

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    SEMANTiCS '15

    Acceptance Rates

    SEMANTICS '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 22 of 97 submissions, 23%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 40 of 182 submissions, 22%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 24 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2017)Semantic User Profiles: Learning Scholars’ Competences by Analyzing Their PublicationsSemantics, Analytics, Visualization. Enhancing Scholarly Data10.1007/978-3-319-53637-8_12(113-130)Online publication date: 10-May-2017

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media