Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2811411.2811507acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesracsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Breast cancer classification of mammographic masses using improved shape features

Published: 09 October 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Breast cancer classification technique divides breast cancer into two categories, benign tumors and malignant tumors. The main purpose of breast cancer classification is to classify abnormalities into benign or malignant classes and thus help physicians with further analysis by minimizing the possible errors that can be done because of fatigued or inexperienced physician. In this paper, we propose three new shape features to classify mammographic images into benign and malignant class. SVM is used as a machine learning tool for training and classification purpose. In order to evaluate the improved performance of the proposed shape features, convexity, circularity and a modified global shape feature of compactness was used. The result shows that the proposed shape features can improve measure of performances such as MCC, specificity, sensitivity and accuracy and can be a promising tool to provide preliminary decision support information to physicians for further diagnosis.

References

[1]
U.S. Breast Cancer Statistics. (2011). {Online}. Available: http://www.breastcancer.org/symptoms/understand_bc/statistics.jsp
[2]
Althuis, M. D., Dozier, J. M., Anderson, W. F., Devesa, S. S., and Brinton, L. A., 2005. Global trends in breast cancer incidence and mortality 1973--1997. Int J Epidemiol 34, 2 (Apr), 405--412. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyh414.
[3]
American Cancer Society, "Breast Cancer", American Cancer Society, Inc., Surveillance and Health Policy Research, Feb 2011
[4]
Champaign, J. L. and Cederbom, G. J., 2000. Advances in Breast Cancer Detection with Screening Mammography. Ochsner J 2, 1 (Jan), 33--35.
[5]
Mercimek, M., Gulez, K., and Mumcu, T., 2005. Real object recognition using moment invariants. Sadhana 30, 6 (2005/12/01), 765--775. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02716709
[6]
Boujelben, A., Tmar, H., Abid, M. and Mnif J. 2012. Automatic Diagnosis of Breast Tissue, Advances in Cancer Management, Prof. Ravinder Mohan (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-307-870-0, InTech. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/advances-in-cancer-management/automatic-diagnosis-of-breast-tissue
[7]
Chang, R.-F., Wu, W.-J., Moon, W., and Chen, D.-R., 2005. Automatic ultrasound segmentation and morphology based diagnosis of solid breast tumors. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 89, 2 (2005/01/01), 179--185. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-004-2043-z.
[8]
Rangayyan, R. M., Mudigonda, N. R., and Desautels, J. E. L., 2000. Boundary modelling and shape analysis methods for classification of mammographic masses. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 38, 5 (2000/09/01), 487--496. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02345742.
[9]
Boujelben, A., Chaabani, A. C., Tmar, H., and Abid, M., 2009. Feature Extraction from Contours Shape for Tumor Analyzing in Mammographic Images. In Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications, 2009. DICTA '09., 395--399. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/DICTA.2009.71.
[10]
Yang, S.-C., Wang, C.-M., Chung, Y.-N., Hsu, G.-C., Lee, S.-K., Chung, P.-C., and Chang, C.-I., 2005. A Computer-Aided System for Mass detection and Classification in Digitized Mammograms. Biomedical Engineering: Applications, Basis and Communications 17, 05, 215--228. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/
[11]
Guliato, D., De Carvalho, J. D., Rangayyan, R. M., and Santiago, S. A., 2008. Feature Extraction from a Signature Based on the Turning Angle Function for the Classification of Breast Tumors. Journal of Digital Imaging 21, 2 (10/31 05/16/received 07/22/revised 08/05/accepted), 129--144. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-007-9069-9.
[12]
Pohlman, S., Powell, K., Obuchowski, N., Chilcote, W., and Grundfest-Broniatowski, S., 1995. Classification of breast lesions based on quantitative measures of tumor morphology. In Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1995. IEEE 17th Annual Conference, 537--538 vol.531. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.1995.575238.
[13]
Zhang, D. and Lu, G., 2004. Review of shape representation and description techniques. Pattern Recognition 37, 1 (1//), 1-19. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2003.07.008.
[14]
Chun-fu, L. and Sheng-de, W., 2002. Fuzzy support vector machines. Neural Networks, IEEE Transactions on 13, 2, 464--471. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/72.991432.
[15]
Osuna, E., Freund, R., and Girosi, F., 1997. Training support vector machines: an application to face detection. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1997. Proceedings, 1997 IEEE Computer Society Conference on, 130--136. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.1997.609310.
[16]
Pontil, M. and Verri, A., 1998. Support vector machines for 3D object recognition. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on 20, 6, 637--646. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/34.683777.
[17]
Neves, R. P., Zanchettin, C., and Filho, A. G. L., 2012. An Efficient Way of Combining SVMs for Handwritten Digit Recognition. In Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning -- ICANN 2012, A. P. Villa, W. Duch, P. Érdi, F. Masulli and G. Palm Eds. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 229--237. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33266-1_29.
[18]
Chapelle, O., Haffner, P., and Vapnik, V. N., 1999. Support vector machines for histogram-based image classification. Neural Networks, IEEE Transactions on 10, 5, 1055--1064. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/72.788646.
[19]
Yang Mingqiang, Kpalma Kidiyo and Ronsin Joseph (2008). A Survey of Shape Feature Extraction Techniques, Pattern Recognition Techniques, Technology and Applications, Peng-Yeng Yin (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-7619-24-4, InTech. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/pattern_recognition_techniques_technology_and_applications/a_survey_of_shape_feature_extraction_techniques
[20]
Huang, Y. L., Chen, D. R., Jiang, Y. R., Kuo, S. J., Wu, H. K., and Moon, W. K., 2008. Computer-aided diagnosis using morphological features for classifying breast lesions on ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 32, 4 (Sep), 565--572. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.5205.
[21]
Lim, M., Hou, A., Congdon, N., and Chua, J., 2013. Feature Identification for Colon Tumor Classification. SIAM Undergraduate Research Online (SIURO) Volume 6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/13S012212
[22]
Shen, L., Rangayyan, R. M., and Desautels, J. E. L., 1993. Detection and Classification of Mammographic Calcifications. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence 07, 06, 1403--1416. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/
[23]
Rangayyan, R. M., El-Faramawy, N. M., Desautels, J. E. L., and Alim, O. A., 1997. Measures of acutance and shape for classification of breast tumors. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on 16, 6, 799--810. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/42.650876.
[24]
Moon, J., Kim, H. I., Choi, H. D., and Jeon, S. I., 2012. A support vector machine based classifier to extract abnormal features from breast magnetic resonance images. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Research in Applied Computation Symposium (San Antonio, Texas2012), ACM, 2401637, 148-152. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2401603.2401637.
[25]
Damaševičius, R., 2010. Optimization of SVM parameters for recognition of regulatory DNA sequences. TOP 18, 2 (2010/12/01), 339--353. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11750-010-0152-x.
[26]
Gaspar, P., Carbonell, J., and Oliveira, J. L., 2012. On the parameter optimization of Support Vector Machines for binary classification. J Integr Bioinform 9, 3, 201. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.2390/biecoll-jib-2012-201.
[27]
Chuin-mu, W., Xiao-xing, M., Geng-cheng, L., and Chio-tan, K., 2008. Classification for Breast MRI Using Support Vector Machine. In Computer and Information Technology Workshops, 2008. CIT Workshops 2008. IEEE 8th International Conference on, 362--367. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CIT.2008.Workshops.90.
[28]
http://marathon.csee.usf.edu/Mammography/Database.html

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Computational Tools for Drug Discovery of Anticancer TherapyTargeted Cancer Therapy in Biomedical Engineering10.1007/978-981-19-9786-0_25(887-904)Online publication date: 12-Apr-2023
  • (2022)Achieving highly efficient breast ultrasound tumor classification with deep convolutional neural networksInternational Journal of Information Technology10.1007/s41870-022-00901-414:7(3311-3320)Online publication date: 19-Feb-2022
  • (2022)A review on machine learning techniques for the assessment of image grading in breast mammogramInternational Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics10.1007/s13042-022-01546-213:9(2609-2635)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2022

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
RACS '15: Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on research in adaptive and convergent systems
October 2015
540 pages
ISBN:9781450337380
DOI:10.1145/2811411
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 09 October 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. circularity range ratio
  2. classification
  3. convexity index
  4. irregularity ratio
  5. shape features
  6. support vector machine

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

RACS '15
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

RACS '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 75 of 309 submissions, 24%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 393 of 1,581 submissions, 25%

Upcoming Conference

RACS '24

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 29 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Computational Tools for Drug Discovery of Anticancer TherapyTargeted Cancer Therapy in Biomedical Engineering10.1007/978-981-19-9786-0_25(887-904)Online publication date: 12-Apr-2023
  • (2022)Achieving highly efficient breast ultrasound tumor classification with deep convolutional neural networksInternational Journal of Information Technology10.1007/s41870-022-00901-414:7(3311-3320)Online publication date: 19-Feb-2022
  • (2022)A review on machine learning techniques for the assessment of image grading in breast mammogramInternational Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics10.1007/s13042-022-01546-213:9(2609-2635)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2022

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media