Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2809563.2809599acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesi-knowConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Perceptual factors in knowledge map visual design

Published: 21 October 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Knowledge visualization is an effective instrument for knowledge creation, acquisition and transfer. Knowledge maps are the most common knowledge visualization techniques, specifically, mind maps. Managers frequently use these instruments in their work for business analytics purposes, but the preparation of such maps must follow several laws in order to make them effective.
The goal of the current paper is to develop the methodology and some practical recommendations how to design knowledge maps that can be used for knowledge codification, transfer, sharing and dissemination in companies. The paper also evaluates proposed visualization laws for creating knowledge maps based on the principles of cognitive psychology. The knowledge maps visual design methodology is based on perceptual factors and include the law of pragnanz (the law of good shape) and the law of parsimony (the Ockham's razor principle). The results were obtained through the qualitative analysis of group mind maps of 48 top-managers of Russian companies. We may assert that for the knowledge map to be effective in knowledge codification, transfer, sharing and dissemination in companies it should follow laws of good shape, parsimony and tips related to knowledge maps design.
The proposed framework of visualization laws is important for many reasons. It is targeted at the development of methodologies and related technologies that can scaffold the process of knowledge structuring and transfer for managers' business analytics tasks and decision-making. The paper contributes to managerial practice by describing the practical recommendations for effective visual knowledge structuring.

References

[1]
Bauer M. I., Johnson-Laird P. N. 1993. How diagrams can improve reasoning. Psychological Review. 4, 6, pp. 72--378.
[2]
Buzan T. 2003. The Mind Map Book. London: BBC Active.
[3]
Card K. S., Mackinlay J. D., Shneiderman B. 1999. Readings in Information Visualization, Using Vision to Think. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
[4]
Eppler M. J. 2006. A comparison between concept maps, mind maps, conceptual diagrams, and visual metaphors as complementary tools for knowledge construction and sharing. Information Visualization. 5, 3, pp. 202--210.
[5]
Eppler M. J., Burkhard R. A. 2004. Knowledge Visualization-Towards a New Discipline and its Fields of Application. ICA Working Paper 2/2004. University of Lugano.
[6]
Eppler M. J., Burkhard R. A. 2007. Visual representations in knowledge management: Framework and cases. Journal of Knowledge Management. 11, 4, pp. 112--122.
[7]
Eppler M. J., Hoffmann F., Bresciani S. 2011. New Business Models Through Collaborative Idea Generation. International Journal of Innovation Management. 6, 15, pp. 1323--1341.
[8]
Eppler M. J., Platts K. 2009. Visual Strategizing: The Systematic Use of Visualization in the Strategic Planning Process. Long Range Planning. 2, pp. 42--74.
[9]
Gavrilova T. 2010. Orchestrating Ontologies for Courseware Design. In Affective, Interactive and Cognitive Methods for E-Learning Design: Creating an Optimal Education Experience, Eds. A. Tzanavari, N. Tsapatsoulis. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, pp. 155--172.
[10]
Glenberg A. M., Langston W. E. 1992. Comprehension of illustrated text: Pictures help to build mental models. Journal of Memory and Language. 31,1, pp. 129--151.
[11]
Larkin J. H., Simon H. A. 1987. Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science. 11, 1, pp. 65--100.
[12]
Lurie N. H., Mason C. H. 2007. Visual representation: Implications for decision making. Journal of Marketing. 71, pp. 160--177.
[13]
Mason K., Spring M. 2011. The Sites and Practices of Business Models. Industrial Marketing Management. 40, 6, pp. 1032--1041.
[14]
Mento A. J., Martinelli P., Jones R. M. 1999. Mind mapping in executive education: Applications and outcomes. Journal of Management Development. 18, 4, pp. 390--416.
[15]
Schneiderman B. 1996. The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages. IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 336--343.
[16]
Tufte E. R. 1991. Envisioning information. Optometry & Vision Science. 68, 4, pp. 322--324.
[17]
Tversky B. 2005. Visuospatial reasoning. In The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, Eds. K. Holyoak, R. G. Morrison. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 209--240.
[18]
Vessey I. 1991. Cognitive fit: A theory-based analysis of the graphs versus tables literature. Decision Sciences. 22, pp. 219--241.
[19]
Ware C. 2010. Visual Thinking for Design. Kaufmann Morgan

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Towards a Distributed Record of Measurement Adapters Powered by Blockchain TechnologyTransformations Through Blockchain Technology10.1007/978-3-030-93344-9_5(113-135)Online publication date: 8-Mar-2022
  • (2020)Towards a Model to Improve Boolean Knowledge Mapping by Using Text Mining and Its ApplicationsInternational Journal of Information Retrieval Research10.4018/IJIRR.202007010310:3(35-56)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2020
  • (2020)An Overview of Knowledge Mapping in Digital Business Industry: A Systematic Literature Review2020 7th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computer Sciences and Informatics (EECSI)10.23919/EECSI50503.2020.9251878(216-221)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
i-KNOW '15: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Knowledge Technologies and Data-driven Business
October 2015
314 pages
ISBN:9781450337212
DOI:10.1145/2809563
  • General Chairs:
  • Stefanie Lindstaedt,
  • Tobias Ley,
  • Harald Sack
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 October 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. concept maps
  2. knowledge maps
  3. knowledge visualization
  4. mind maps
  5. perceptual factors
  6. visual design

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

  • Russian Science Foundation

Conference

i-KNOW '15

Acceptance Rates

i-KNOW '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 25 of 78 submissions, 32%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 77 of 238 submissions, 32%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 21 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Towards a Distributed Record of Measurement Adapters Powered by Blockchain TechnologyTransformations Through Blockchain Technology10.1007/978-3-030-93344-9_5(113-135)Online publication date: 8-Mar-2022
  • (2020)Towards a Model to Improve Boolean Knowledge Mapping by Using Text Mining and Its ApplicationsInternational Journal of Information Retrieval Research10.4018/IJIRR.202007010310:3(35-56)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2020
  • (2020)An Overview of Knowledge Mapping in Digital Business Industry: A Systematic Literature Review2020 7th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computer Sciences and Informatics (EECSI)10.23919/EECSI50503.2020.9251878(216-221)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2020
  • (2019)A Framework to Maximise the Communicative Power of Knowledge VisualisationsProceedings of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists 201910.1145/3351108.3351111(1-10)Online publication date: 17-Sep-2019
  • (2019)The relationship between knowledge mapping and the open innovation process: the case of education systemArtificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing10.1017/S089006041900032534:1(17-29)Online publication date: 28-Nov-2019
  • (2017)Charting the path towards effective knowledge visualisationsProceedings of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists10.1145/3129416.3129421(1-10)Online publication date: 26-Sep-2017

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media