Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2872427.2883051acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Objective Variables for Probabilistic Revenue Maximization in Second-Price Auctions with Reserve

Published: 11 April 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Many online companies sell advertisement space in second-price auctions with reserve. In this paper, we develop a probabilistic method to learn a profitable strategy to set the reserve price. We use historical auction data with features to fit a predictor of the best reserve price. This problem is delicate - the structure of the auction is such that a reserve price set too high is much worse than a reserve price set too low. To address this we develop objective variables, an approach for combining probabilistic modeling with optimal decision-making. Objective variables are "hallucinated observations" that transform the revenue maximization task into a regularized maximum likelihood estimation problem, which we solve with the EM algorithm. This framework enables a variety of prediction mechanisms to set the reserve price. As examples, we study objective variable methods with regression, kernelized regression, and neural networks on simulated and real data. Our methods outperform previous approaches both in terms of scalability and profit.

References

[1]
A. Aizerman, E. Braverman, and L. Rozoner. Theoretical foundations of the potential function method in pattern recognition learning. Automation and remote control, 25, 1964.
[2]
J. Albert and S. Chib. Bayesian analysis of binary and polychotomous response data. Journal of the American statistical Association, 88(422):669--679, 1993.
[3]
Z. Bar-Yossef, K. Hildrum, and F. Wu. Incentive-compatible online auctions for digital goods. In ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms, pages 964--970, 2002.
[4]
F. Bastien et al. Theano: new features and speed improvements. Deep Learning and Unsupervised Feature Learning NIPS 2012 Workshop, 2012.
[5]
J. Bergstra et al. Theano: a CPU and GPU math expression compiler. In Proceedings of the Python for Scientific Computing Conference (SciPy), June 2010.
[6]
C. Bishop et al. Neural networks for pattern recognition. 1995.
[7]
C. Bishop et al. Pattern recognition and machine learning, volume 4. springer New York, 2006.
[8]
N. Cesa-Bianchi, C. Gentile, and Y. Mansour. Regret minimization for reserve prices in second-price auctions. In ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pages 1190--1204, 2013.
[9]
A. Dempster, N. Laird, and D. Rubin. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39:1--38, 1977.
[10]
D. Easley and J. Kleinberg. Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning About a Highly Connected World. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2010.
[11]
X. Glorot and Y. Bengio. Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. In International conference on artificial intelligence and statistics, pages 249--256, 2010.
[12]
C. Holmes, L. Held, et al. Bayesian auxiliary variable models for binary and multinomial regression. Bayesian Analysis, 1:145--168, 2006.
[13]
A. Medina and M. Mohri. Learning theory and algorithms for revenue optimization in second price auctions with reserve. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 2014.
[14]
M. Ostrovsky and M. Schwarz. Reserve prices in internet advertising auctions: A field experiment. In ACM conference on Electronic commerce, pages 59--60, 2011.
[15]
L. Prechelt. Early stopping - but when? In Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade, pages 53--67. Springer, 2012.
[16]
A. E. Roth and A. Ockenfels. Last minute bidding and the rules for ending second price auctions: evidence from ebay and amazon auctions on the internet. American economic review, 92(4):1093--1103, 2002.
[17]
P. Tao and L. An. A DC optimization algorithm for solving the trust-region subproblem. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 8(2):476--505, 1998.
[18]
M. Toussaint, L. Charlin, and P. Poupart. Hierarchical pomdp controller optimization by likelihood maximization. In UAI, volume 24, pages 562--570, 2008.
[19]
M. Toussaint, S. Harmeling, and A. Storkey. Probabilistic inference for solving (po) mdps. 2006.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Objective Variables for Probabilistic Revenue Maximization in Second-Price Auctions with Reserve

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WWW '16: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web
      April 2016
      1482 pages
      ISBN:9781450341431

      Sponsors

      • IW3C2: International World Wide Web Conference Committee

      In-Cooperation

      Publisher

      International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee

      Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland

      Publication History

      Published: 11 April 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. graphical models
      2. online auctions
      3. second-price auctions

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Funding Sources

      • NSF
      • ONR
      • DARPA

      Conference

      WWW '16
      Sponsor:
      • IW3C2
      WWW '16: 25th International World Wide Web Conference
      April 11 - 15, 2016
      Québec, Montréal, Canada

      Acceptance Rates

      WWW '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 115 of 727 submissions, 16%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)51
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8
      Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2023)Identification in english auctions with shill biddingQuantitative Marketing and Economics10.1007/s11129-023-09274-922:2(193-222)Online publication date: 23-Nov-2023
      • (2021)Scalable Optimal Online AuctionsMarketing Science10.1287/mksc.2021.128340:4(593-618)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2021
      • (2020)Bisection-based pricing for repeated contextual auctions against strategic buyerProceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning10.5555/3524938.3526001(11469-11480)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2020
      • (2020)Reserve pricing in repeated second-price auctions with strategic biddersProceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning10.5555/3524938.3525189(2678-2689)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2020
      • (2020)Optimal non-parametric learning in repeated contextual auctions with strategic buyerProceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning10.5555/3524938.3525188(2668-2677)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2020
      • (2020)Real-time optimisation for online learning in auctionsProceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning10.5555/3524938.3525145(2217-2226)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2020
      • (2020)Learning to Design Coupons in Online Advertising MarketsProceedings of the 19th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems10.5555/3398761.3398905(1242-1250)Online publication date: 5-May-2020
      • (2019)Optimal pricing in repeated posted-price auctions with different patience of the seller and the buyerProceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems10.5555/3454287.3454372(941-953)Online publication date: 8-Dec-2019
      • (2019)Optimizing reserve prices for publishers in online ad auctions2019 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering & Economics (CIFEr)10.1109/CIFEr.2019.8759123(1-8)Online publication date: May-2019
      • (2019)A PSO-based Algorithm for Reserve Price Optimization in Online Ad Auctions2019 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC)10.1109/CEC.2019.8789915(2611-2619)Online publication date: Jun-2019
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Get Access

      Login options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media