Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2851581.2892434acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Evaluation of Callout Design for Ultra-small Touch Screen Devices

Published: 07 May 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Ultra-small touch screen devices tend to suffer from occlusion or the fat finger problem owing to their limited input area. Callout design, a design principle that involves the placement of a callout in a non-occluded area in order to display the occluded area, could eliminate occlusion. However, callout designs for ultra-small touch screen devices have not yet been explored. In this study, we conducted an experiment to examine eight callout designs for ultra-small touch screen devices. The results show that the selection speed was higher when the content of the callout was changed continuously, the error rate decreased when a pointer was displayed to indicate the touched position within the callout, and the workload decreased when the content was changed continuously. Further, the score that subjectively evaluates the performance decreased when the position of the callout was fixed.

References

[1]
Patrick Baudisch and Gerry Chu. 2009. Back-of-device Interaction Allows Creating Very Small Touch Devices. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1923-1932.
[2]
Xiang 'Anthony' Chen, Tovi Grossman, and George Fitzmaurice. 2014. Swipeboard: A Text Entry Technique for Ultra-small Interfaces That Supports Novice to Expert Transitions. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 615-620.
[3]
Sandra G. Hart and Lowell E. Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. Human mental workload 1, 3 (1988), 139-183.
[4]
Jonggi Hong, Seongkook Heo, Poika Isokoski, and Geehyuk Lee. 2015. SplitBoard: A Simple Split Soft Keyboard for Wristwatch-sized Touch Screens. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1233-1236.
[5]
Makiko Kouchi. 2012. AIST The measurement data of the hands of the Japanese. https://www.dh.aist.go.jp/database/hand/index.html (In Japanese) Last accessed on February 10, 2016. (2012).
[6]
Luis A. Leiva, Alireza Sahami, Alejandro Catala, Niels Henze, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2015. Text Entry on Tiny QWERTY Soft Keyboards. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 669-678.
[7]
Shinji Miyake and Masaharu Kumashiro. 1993. Subjective mental workload assessment technique - An introduction to NASA-TLX and SWAT and a proposal of simple scoring methods -. Human factors and ergonomics 29, 6 (1993), 399-408. (In Japanese).
[8]
Stephen Oney, Chris Harrison, Amy Ogan, and Jason Wiese. 2013. ZoomBoard: A Diminutive QWERTY Soft Keyboard using Iterative Zooming for Ultra-small Devices. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2799-2802.
[9]
Richard L. Potter, Linda J. Weldon, and Ben Shneiderman. 1988. Improving the Accuracy of Touch Screens: An Experimental Evaluation of Three Strategies. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '88). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 27-32.
[10]
Andrew Sears and Ben Shneiderman. 1991. High Precision Touchscreens: Design Strategies and Comparisons with a Mouse. International Journal of ManMachine Studies 34, 4 (April 1991), 593-613.
[11]
Katie A. Siek, Yvonne Rogers, and Kay H. Connelly. 2005. Fat Finger Worries: How Older and Younger Users Physically Interact with PDAs. In Proceedings of the 2005 IFIP TC13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT'05). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 267-280.
[12]
Daniel Vogel and Patrick Baudisch. 2007. Shift: A Technique for Operating Pen-based Interfaces using Touch. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 657-666.
[13]
Haijun Xia, Tovi Grossman, and George Fitzmaurice. 2015. NanoStylus: Enhancing Input on UltraSmall Displays with a Finger-Mounted Stylus. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 447-456.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)A One-Page Text Entry Method Optimized for Rectangle SmartwatchesIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing10.1109/TMC.2021.305722621:10(3443-3454)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2022
  • (2018)D-SWIMEProceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3173574.3174208(1-13)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2018
  • (2016)Exploring callout design in selection task for ultra-small touch screen devicesProceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/3010915.3010922(426-434)Online publication date: 29-Nov-2016

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CHI EA '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
May 2016
3954 pages
ISBN:9781450340823
DOI:10.1145/2851581
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 May 2016

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. fat finger
  2. interaction technique
  3. occlusion
  4. small target acquisition
  5. smartwatch
  6. wearable devices

Qualifiers

  • Abstract

Conference

CHI'16
Sponsor:
CHI'16: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
May 7 - 12, 2016
California, San Jose, USA

Acceptance Rates

CHI EA '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 1,000 of 5,000 submissions, 20%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CHI '25
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
April 26 - May 1, 2025
Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 24 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)A One-Page Text Entry Method Optimized for Rectangle SmartwatchesIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing10.1109/TMC.2021.305722621:10(3443-3454)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2022
  • (2018)D-SWIMEProceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3173574.3174208(1-13)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2018
  • (2016)Exploring callout design in selection task for ultra-small touch screen devicesProceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/3010915.3010922(426-434)Online publication date: 29-Nov-2016

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media