Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2739480.2754727acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Evolving Solutions to TSP Variants for Active Space Debris Removal

Published: 11 July 2015 Publication History

Abstract

The space close to our planet is getting more and more polluted. Orbiting debris are posing an increasing threat to operational orbits and the cascading effect, known as Kessler syndrome, may result in a future where the risk of orbiting our planet at some altitudes will be unacceptable. Many argue that the debris density at the Low Earth Orbit (LEO) has already reached a level sufficient to trigger such a cascading effect. An obvious consequence is that we may soon have to actively clean space from debris. Such a space mission will involve a complex combinatorial decision as to choose which debris to remove and in what order. In this paper, we find that this part of the design of an active debris removal mission (ADR) can be mapped into increasingly complex variants to the classic Travelling Salesman Problem (TSP) and that they can be solved by the Inver-over algorithm improving the current state-of-the-art in ADR mission design. We define static and dynamic cases, according to whether we consider the debris orbits as fixed in time or subject to orbital perturbations. We are able, for the first time, to select optimally objects from debris clouds of considerable size: hundreds debris pieces considered while previous works stopped at tens.

References

[1]
Donald J Kessler and Burton G Cour-Palais. Collision frequency of artificial satellites: The creation of a debris belt. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics (1978{2012), 83(A6):2637--2646, 1978.
[2]
J-C Liou and Nicholas L Johnson. Instability of the present leo satellite populations. Advances in Space Research, 41(7):1046--1053, 2008.
[3]
Vitali Braun, A Lüpken, S Flegel, J Gelhaus, M Möckel, C Kebschull, C Wiedemann, and P Vörsmann. Active debris removal of multiple priority targets. Advances in Space Research, 51(9):1638--1648, 2013.
[4]
Brent W Barbee, Salvatore Alfano, Elfego Pinon, Kenn Gold, and David Gaylor. Design of spacecraft missions to remove multiple orbital debris objects. In Aerospace Conference, 2011 IEEE, pages 1--14. IEEE, 2011.
[5]
Max Cerf. Multiple Space Debris Collecting Mission-Debris Selection and Trajectory Optimization. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 156(3):761--796, 2013.
[6]
S. Hokamoto and J. Murakami. Genetic-algorithm-based randezvous trajectory design for multiple active debris removal. In 28th International Symposium on Space Technology and Science, 2011.
[7]
Guo Tao and Zbigniew Michalewicz. Inver-over operator for the tsp. In Parallel Problem Solving from Nature-PPSN V, pages 803--812. Springer, 1998.
[8]
David A Vallado and Paul Crawford. SGP4 orbit determination. In Proceedings of AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit, pages 18--21, 2008.
[9]
Nicholas L Johnson, JR Gabbard, GT Devere, and EE Johnson. History of on-orbit satellite fragmentations. Technical report, NASA NTRS, ID:19840026390, 1984.
[10]
Theodore N Edelbaum. Propulsion requirements for controllable satellites. ARS Journal, 31(8):1079--1089, 1961.
[11]
Ahmed Gad and Ossama Abdelkhalik. Hidden genes genetic algorithm for multi-gravity-assist trajectories optimization. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 48(4):629--641, 2011.
[12]
Dario Izzo, Luís F Simoes, Chit Hong Yam, Francesco Biscani, David Di Lorenzo, Bernardetta Addis, and Andrea Cassioli. GTOC5: Results from the European Space Agency and University of Florence. Acta Futura, 8:45--55, 2014.
[13]
Aimin Zhou, Lishan Kang, and Zhenyu Yan. Solving dynamic tsp with evolutionary approach in real time. In Evolutionary Computation, 2003. CEC'03. The 2003 Congress on, volume 2, pages 951--957. IEEE, 2003.
[14]
Changhe Li, Ming Yang, and Lishan Kang. A new approach to solving dynamic traveling salesman problems. In Simulated Evolution and Learning, pages 236--243. Springer, 2006.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)An Iterative Optimization Algorithm for Planning Spacecraft Pathways Through AsteroidsApplied Sciences10.3390/app14231098714:23(10987)Online publication date: 26-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Rapid Sequence Generation for Active Debris Removal Mission Based on Attention Mechanism and Pointer NetworkIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.342516112(95020-95034)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)Trajectory optimization of flybys of multiple irregular satellites of Jupiter with Galilean moons gravity assistAstrophysics and Space Science10.1007/s10509-024-04305-7369:4Online publication date: 19-Apr-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
GECCO '15: Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
July 2015
1496 pages
ISBN:9781450334723
DOI:10.1145/2739480
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 11 July 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. clean space
  2. dynamic travelling salesman
  3. inver-over
  4. space debris
  5. tsp
  6. vehicle routing

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

GECCO '15
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

GECCO '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 182 of 505 submissions, 36%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,669 of 4,410 submissions, 38%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)131
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
Reflects downloads up to 14 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)An Iterative Optimization Algorithm for Planning Spacecraft Pathways Through AsteroidsApplied Sciences10.3390/app14231098714:23(10987)Online publication date: 26-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Rapid Sequence Generation for Active Debris Removal Mission Based on Attention Mechanism and Pointer NetworkIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.342516112(95020-95034)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)Trajectory optimization of flybys of multiple irregular satellites of Jupiter with Galilean moons gravity assistAstrophysics and Space Science10.1007/s10509-024-04305-7369:4Online publication date: 19-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Task planning of space debris removal based on a hierarchical exploration artificial bee colony algorithmNeural Computing and Applications10.1007/s00521-023-09399-836:12(6597-6612)Online publication date: 19-Feb-2024
  • (2023)Optimization Challenges at the European Space AgencyProceedings of the Companion Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation10.1145/3583133.3595039(1399-1415)Online publication date: 15-Jul-2023
  • (2023)Evolutionary Optimization for Active Debris Removal Mission PlanningIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.326930511(41019-41033)Online publication date: 2023
  • (2023)Trajectory optimization for multi-target Active Debris Removal missionsAdvances in Space Research10.1016/j.asr.2022.12.01372:7(2801-2823)Online publication date: Oct-2023
  • (2022)Optimization of low-thrust multi-debris removal mission via an efficient approximation model of orbit rendezvousProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering10.1177/09544100221074746236:14(3045-3056)Online publication date: 24-Mar-2022
  • (2022)An Interpolated Approach for Active Debris Removal2022 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC)10.1109/CEC55065.2022.9870437(1-6)Online publication date: 18-Jul-2022
  • (2022)A two-level scheme for multiobjective multidebris active removal mission planning in low Earth orbitsScience China Information Sciences10.1007/s11432-020-3049-565:5Online publication date: 31-Mar-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media