Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

Teaching Recommender Systems at Large Scale: Evaluation and Lessons Learned from a Hybrid MOOC

Published: 15 April 2015 Publication History

Abstract

In the fall of 2013, we offered an open online Introduction to Recommender Systems through Coursera, while simultaneously offering a for-credit version of the course on-campus using the Coursera platform and a flipped classroom instruction model. As the goal of offering this course was to experiment with this type of instruction, we performed extensive evaluation including surveys of demographics, self-assessed skills, and learning intent; we also designed a knowledge-assessment tool specifically for the subject matter in this course, administering it before and after the course to measure learning, and again 5 months later to measure retention. We also tracked students through the course, including separating out students enrolled for credit from those enrolled only for the free, open course.
Students had significant knowledge gains across all levels of prior knowledge and across all demographic categories. The main predictor of knowledge gain was effort expended in the course. Students also had significant knowledge retention after the course. Both of these results are limited to the sample of students who chose to complete our knowledge tests. Student completion of the course was hard to predict, with few factors contributing predictive power; the main predictor of completion was intent to complete. Students who chose a concepts-only track with hand exercises achieved the same level of knowledge of recommender systems concepts as those who chose a programming track and its added assignments, though the programming students gained additional programming knowledge. Based on the limited data we were able to gather, face-to-face students performed as well as the online-only students or better; they preferred this format to traditional lecture for reasons ranging from pure convenience to the desire to watch videos at a different pace (slower for English language learners; faster for some native English speakers). This article also includes our qualitative observations, lessons learned, and future directions.

References

[1]
John P. Buerck, Srikanth P. Mudigonda, Stephanie E. Mooshegian, Kyle Collins, Nicholas Grimm, Kristen Bonney, and Hadley Kombrink. 2013. Predicting non-traditional student learning outcomes using data analytics--a pilot research study. Journal of the Computer Science College 28, 5 (May 2013), 260--265.
[2]
J. Champaign, K. F. Colvin, A. Liu, C. Fredericks, D. Seaton, and D. E. Pritchard. 2014. Correlating skill and improvement in 2 MOOCs with a student's time on tasks. Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale. ACM, New York, 11--20.
[3]
Doug Clow. 2013. MOOCs and the funnel of participation. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK’13). ACM, New York, NY, 185--189.
[4]
K. Colvin, J. Champaign, A. Liu, Q. Zhou, C. Fredericks, and D. Pritchard. 2014. Learning in an introductory physics MOOC: All cohorts learn equally, including an on-campus class. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 15, 4.
[5]
J. DeBoer, A. D. Ho, G. S. Stump, and L. Breslow. 2014. Changing “course”: Reconceptualizing educational variables for massive open online courses. Educational Researcher 43, 2, 74--84.
[6]
M. D. Ekstrand, M. Ludwig, J. A. Konstan, and J. T. Riedl. 2011. Rethinking the recommender research ecosystem: reproducibility, openness, and LensKit. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys’11). ACM, New York, NY, 133--140.
[7]
E. J. Emanuel. 2013. Online education: MOOCs taken by educated few. Nature 503, 7476, 342--342.
[8]
René F. Kizilcec, Chris Piech, and Emily Schneider. 2013. Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge.
[9]
J. A. Konstan, J. D. Walker, D. C. Brooks, K. Brown, and M. D. Ekstrand. 2014. Teaching recommender systems at large scale: Evaluation and lessons learned from a hybrid MOOC. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Learning@Scale. 61--70.
[10]
D. A. McConnell, D. N. Steer, K. D. Owens, C. Knight. 2005. How students think: Implications for learning in introductory geoscience courses. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53, 4, 462--470.
[11]
B. Means, Y. Toyama, R. Murphy, M. Bakia, and K. Jones. 2010. Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. Center for Technology in Learning, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC.
[12]
E. T. Pascarella and P. T. Terenzini. 2005. How College Affects Students: Volume 2, A Third Decade of Research. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
[13]
G. B. Semb, J. A. Ellis, and J. Araujo. 1993. Long-term memory for knowledge learned in school. Journal of Educational Psychology 85, 2, 305--316.
[14]
Julia Wilkowski, Amit Deutsch, and Daniel M. Russell. 2014. Student skill and goal achievement in the mapping with google MOOC. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM conference on Learning @ Scale Conference (L@S’14). ACM, New York, NY, 3--10.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Multilayer knowledge graph construction and learning behavior routing guidance based on implicit relationships of MOOCsTechnological Forecasting and Social Change10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123442204(123442)Online publication date: Jul-2024
  • (2023)Global Trends and Policy Strategies and Their Implications for the Sustainable Development of MOOCs in IndonesiaProceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Administrative Science (ICAS 2022)10.2991/978-2-38476-104-3_47(491-508)Online publication date: 29-Sep-2023
  • (2023)Research on the innovation of ideological and political education theory and practice in colleges and universities under the background of big dataApplied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences10.2478/amns.2023.2.001179:1Online publication date: 1-Aug-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction  Volume 22, Issue 2
Special Issue on Online Learning at Scale
April 2015
133 pages
ISSN:1073-0516
EISSN:1557-7325
DOI:10.1145/2744768
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 15 April 2015
Accepted: 01 January 2015
Revised: 01 January 2015
Received: 01 June 2014
Published in TOCHI Volume 22, Issue 2

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Massively Online Open Course (MOOC)
  2. learning assessment

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)48
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Multilayer knowledge graph construction and learning behavior routing guidance based on implicit relationships of MOOCsTechnological Forecasting and Social Change10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123442204(123442)Online publication date: Jul-2024
  • (2023)Global Trends and Policy Strategies and Their Implications for the Sustainable Development of MOOCs in IndonesiaProceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Administrative Science (ICAS 2022)10.2991/978-2-38476-104-3_47(491-508)Online publication date: 29-Sep-2023
  • (2023)Research on the innovation of ideological and political education theory and practice in colleges and universities under the background of big dataApplied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences10.2478/amns.2023.2.001179:1Online publication date: 1-Aug-2023
  • (2023)The Impact of Recommendation System Provided Based on Online Learning Readiness in the MOOC Environment2023 24th International Arab Conference on Information Technology (ACIT)10.1109/ACIT58888.2023.10453910(1-6)Online publication date: 6-Dec-2023
  • (2022)The Construction of Accurate Recommendation Model of Learning Resources of Knowledge Graph under Deep LearningScientific Programming10.1155/2022/10101222022Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
  • (2022)The Challenges of Evolving Technical Courses at Scale: Four Case Studies of Updating Large Data Science CoursesProceedings of the Ninth ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale10.1145/3491140.3528278(201-211)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2022
  • (2021)A Study on the Influencing Factors of Continued Intention to Use MOOCs: UTAUT Model and CCC Moderating EffectFrontiers in Psychology10.3389/fpsyg.2021.52825912Online publication date: 4-Aug-2021
  • (2021)Educational Big Data: Predictions, Applications and ChallengesBig Data Research10.1016/j.bdr.2021.100270(100270)Online publication date: Sep-2021
  • (2020)LensKit for Python: Next-Generation Software for Recommender Systems ExperimentsProceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management10.1145/3340531.3412778(2999-3006)Online publication date: 19-Oct-2020
  • (2020)Influence of learner motivational dispositions on MOOC completionJournal of Computing in Higher Education10.1007/s12528-020-09258-8Online publication date: 12-Jun-2020
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media