Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2723576.2723604acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageslakConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

How do you connect?: analysis of social capital accumulation in connectivist MOOCs

Published: 16 March 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Connections established between learners via interactions are seen as fundamental for connectivist pedagogy. Connections can also be viewed as learning outcomes, i.e. learners' social capital accumulated through distributed learning environments. We applied linear mixed effects modeling to investigate whether the social capital accumulation interpreted through learners' centrality to course interaction networks, is influenced by the language learners use to express and communicate in two connectivist MOOCs. Interactions were distributed across the three social media, namely Twitter, blog and Facebook. Results showed that learners in a cMOOC connect easier with the individuals who use a more informal, narrative style, but still maintain a deeper cohesive structure to their communication.

References

[1]
A. A. Mcauley, B. Stewart, G. Siemens, and D. Cormier, "The MOOC Model for Digital Practice," p. 33, 2010.
[2]
A. Fini, "The Technological Dimension of a Massive Open Online Course: The Case of the CCK08 Course Tools," Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn., vol. 10, no. 5, 2009.
[3]
R. Kop, "The challenges to connectivist learning on open online networks: Learning experiences during a Massive Open Online Course," Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 19--38, 2011.
[4]
R. Kop, J. Sui, and F. Mak, "A Pedagogy of Abundance or a Pedagogy to Support Human Beings? Participant Support on Massive Open Online Courses," Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn., vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 1--10, 2011.
[5]
C. Milligan, A. Littlejohn, and A. Margaryan, "Patterns of Engagement in a Connectivist MOOC," J. Online Learn. Teach., vol. 9, no. 2, 2013.
[6]
J. Anh, B. Butler, and A. Alam, "Learner Participation and Engagement in Open Online Courses: Insights from the Peer 2 Peer University," MERLOT JOLT, vol. 9, no. 2, 2013.
[7]
J. Knox, "Digital culture clash: 'massive' education in the Elearning and Digital Cultures MOOC," Distance Educ., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 164--177, 2014.
[8]
N. Lin, "Social capital: a theory of social structure and action," Soc. Forces, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 1209--11, 2004.
[9]
A. Lockwood, "Community collaboration and social capital: an interview with Gary G. Wehlage," Lead. Tomorrows Sch., vol. 2, pp. 19--25, 1996.
[10]
J. Scott and P. Carrington, The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis. SAGE, 2011.
[11]
R. S. Burt, "The Network Structure of Social Capital," Res. Organ. Behav., vol. 22, pp. 345--423, 2000.
[12]
O. Skrypnyk, S. Joksimovic, V. Kovanovic, D. Gasevic, and S. Dawson, "Roles of course facilitators, learners, and technology in the flow of information of a cMOOC," Br. J. Educ. Technol. Spec. Issue MOOCs, p. submmited for review, 2014.
[13]
A. Graesser, D. Mcnamara, and J. Kulikowich, "Coh-Metrix: Providing Multilevel Analyses of Text Characteristics," Educ. Res., vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 223--234, Jun. 2011.
[14]
C. Carceller, S. Dawson, and L. Lockyer, "Improving academic outcomes: does participating in online discussion forums payoff?," Int. J. Technol. Enhanc. Learn., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 117--132, 2013.
[15]
L. M. Vaquero and M. Cebrian, "The rich club phenomenon in the classroom," Sci Rep, vol. 3, Jan. 2013.
[16]
D. Gašević, A. Zouaq, and R. Janzen, "'Choose Your Classmates, Your GPA Is at Stake!': The Association of Cross-Class Social Ties and Academic Performance," Am. Behav. Sci., 2013.
[17]
V. Kovanović, S. Joksimović, D. Gašević, and M. Hatala, "What is the Source of Social Capital? The Association between Social Network Position and Social Presence in Communities of Inquiry," in Proceedings of the Workshops held at Educational Data Mining 2014, co-located with 7th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM 2014), London, UK, 2014, pp. 1--8.
[18]
A. J. Scholand, Y. R. Tausczik, and J. W. Pennebaker, "Assessing Group Interaction with Social Language Network Analysis," in Advances in Social Computing, S.-K. Chai, J. J. Salerno, and P. L. Mabry, Eds. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010, pp. 248--255.
[19]
A. C. Graesser and D. S. McNamara, "Computational Analyses of Multilevel Discourse Comprehension," Top. Cogn. Sci., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 371--398, 2011.
[20]
W. Kintsch, Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
[21]
C. E. Snow, Reading for Understanding: Toward a Research and Development Program in Reading Comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation, 2002.
[22]
N. Dowell, W. Cade, Y. Tausczik, J. Pennebaker, and A. Graesser, "What Works: Creating Adaptive and Intelligent Systems for Collaborative Learning Support," Intell. Tutoring Syst. Proc. ITS 2014, pp. 124--133, 2014.
[23]
L. C. Freeman, "Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification," Soc. Netw., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 215--239, 1979.
[24]
S. Wasserman and K. Faust, Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1994, p. 825.
[25]
G. Csardi and T. Nepusz, "The igraph software package for complex network research," InterJournalournal, vol. Complex Sy, p. 1695, 2006.
[26]
D. S. McNamara, A. C. Graesser, P. M. McCarthy, and Z. Cai, Automated evaluation of text and discourse with Coh-Metrix. Cambridge, M.A.: Cambridge University Press., 2014.
[27]
J. C. Pinheiro and D. M. Bates, Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. Springer, 2000.
[28]
S. W. Raudenbush and A. S. Bryk, Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. SAGE Publications, 2002.
[29]
T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman, The Elements of Statistical Learning, 2nd editio. New York: Springer, 2009.
[30]
R. Xu, "Measuring explained variation in linear mixed effects models," Stat. Med., vol. 22, no. 22, pp. 3527--3541, 2003.
[31]
D. Bates, M. Maechler, B. Bolker, and S. Walker, lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. 2013.
[32]
R. H. Baayen, Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge University Press, 2008.
[33]
M. De Laat, "Networked learning," Police Acad. Neth. Apeldoorn, 2006.
[34]
S. Dawson and G. Siemens, "Analytics to literacies: The development of a learning analytics framework for multiliteracies assessment," Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn., vol. 15, no. 4, 2014.
[35]
R. M. Bernard, P. C. Abrami, E. Borokhovski, C. A. Wade, R. M. Tamim, M. A. Surkes, and E. C. Bethel, "A Meta-Analysis of Three Types of Interaction Treatments in Distance Education," Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 1243--1289, Sep. 2009.
[36]
E. Borokhovski, R. Tamim, R. M. Bernard, P. C. Abrami, and A. Sokolovskaya, "Are contextual and designed student--student interaction treatments equally effective in distance education?," Distance Educ., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 311--329, 2012.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Does Review Replying Matter? Influence of online course eWOM on learning satisfactionEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-023-11680-128:12(15469-15496)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2023
  • (2023)Pedagogical Paradigms in Open and Distance EducationHandbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education10.1007/978-981-19-2080-6_9(147-163)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2023
  • (2023)What Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) Stakeholders Can Learn from Learning Analytics?Learning, Design, and Technology10.1007/978-3-319-17461-7_3(3731-3760)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. How do you connect?: analysis of social capital accumulation in connectivist MOOCs

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      LAK '15: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge
      March 2015
      448 pages
      ISBN:9781450334174
      DOI:10.1145/2723576
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 16 March 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Coh-Metrix
      2. MOOCs
      3. automated text analysis
      4. language
      5. learning
      6. social capital
      7. social network analysis
      8. social processes

      Qualifiers

      • Short-paper

      Conference

      LAK '15

      Acceptance Rates

      LAK '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 20 of 74 submissions, 27%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 236 of 782 submissions, 30%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)31
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
      Reflects downloads up to 13 Nov 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2023)Does Review Replying Matter? Influence of online course eWOM on learning satisfactionEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-023-11680-128:12(15469-15496)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2023
      • (2023)Pedagogical Paradigms in Open and Distance EducationHandbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education10.1007/978-981-19-2080-6_9(147-163)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2023
      • (2023)What Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) Stakeholders Can Learn from Learning Analytics?Learning, Design, and Technology10.1007/978-3-319-17461-7_3(3731-3760)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2023
      • (2022)Pedagogical Paradigms in Open and Distance EducationHandbook of Open, Distance and Digital Education10.1007/978-981-19-0351-9_9-1(1-17)Online publication date: 10-Apr-2022
      • (2021)Words describing feelings about death: A comparison of sentiment for self and others and changes over timePLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.024284816:1(e0242848)Online publication date: 6-Jan-2021
      • (2021)Scaffolding Social Presence in MOOCsProceedings of the Asian CHI Symposium 202110.1145/3429360.3468198(140-145)Online publication date: 8-May-2021
      • (2020)Public perceptions towards MOOCs on social media: an alternative perspective to understand personal learning experiences of MOOCsInteractive Learning Environments10.1080/10494820.2020.179941331:2(670-682)Online publication date: 3-Aug-2020
      • (2020)Development of a participation style scale for online instructional discussionsEducational Technology Research and Development10.1007/s11423-020-09817-x68:6(3213-3233)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2020
      • (2019)Counting Clicks is Not EnoughProceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge10.1145/3303772.3303775(501-510)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2019
      • (2019)Cognitive appraisals mediate relationships between two basic psychological needs and emotions in a massive open online courseComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2019.02.00996:C(85-94)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2019
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media