Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2701973.2702735acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

The Effect of Robot Appearance Types and Task Types on Service Evaluation of a Robot

Published: 02 March 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Robot's appearance types could be classified into two types: human-oriented and product-oriented. Human-oriented robot resembles human's appearance whereas product-oriented robot is an intelligent product that robotic technologies are integrated into existing product. In this study, we investigated the impact of two robot appearance types and two task types on service evaluation of a robot. We executed a 2 (robot appearance types: human-oriented vs. product-oriented) x 2 (robot task types: social context vs. task-oriented context) mixed-methods experiment design (N=48). In the case of social context, people evaluated the service provided by a human-oriented robot better than by a product-oriented robot while in the case of task-oriented context, they evaluated the service provided by a product-oriented robot more positively than by a human-oriented robot. Implications for the design of human-robot interaction are discussed.

References

[1]
DiSalvo, C.F., Gemperle, F., Forlizzi, J., and Kiesler, S. 2002. All robots are not created equal: The design and perception of human-oriented robot heads. In Proc. of the DIS. 321--326.
[2]
Breazeal, C. 1999. Robot in society: Friend or appliance? In Proc. of the Agents99 Workshop on Emotion Based Architectures. 18--26.
[3]
Personal Robots Group. 2008. MDS overview. Retrieved Nov. 11, 2014, from Personal Robots Group: http://robotic.media.mit.edu/portfolio/nexi/
[4]
Hoffman, G. 2007. Ensemble: Fluency and embodiment for robots acting with humans. Ph.D. dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. MA: Cambridge.
[5]
Forlizzi, J., DiSalvo, C., Zimmerman, J., Mutlu, B., and Hurst, A. 2005. The sensechair: The lounge chair as an intelligent assistive device for elders. In Proc. of the Conference on Designing for User Experiences. 31.
[6]
Kwak, S. S., Kim, J. S., and Choi, J. J. 2014. Can robots be sold?: The effects of robot designs on the consumers' acceptance of robots. In Proc. of the HRI. 220--221.
[7]
Walters, M., Koay, K., Syrdal, D., Dautenhahn, K., and Boekhorst, R. 2009. Preferences and perceptions of robot appearance and embodiment in human-robot interaction trials. In Proc. of the AISB. 136--143.
[8]
Bartneck, C., Bleeker, T., Bun, J., Fens, P., and Riet, L. 2010. The influence of robot anthropomorphism on the feelings of embarrassment when interacting with robots. Paladyn Journal of Behavioral Robotics. 1, 2, 109--115.
[9]
Kwak, S.S. 2014. The Impact of the Robot Appearance Types on Social Interaction with a Robot and Service Evaluation of a Robot. Archives of Design Research. 27, 2, 81--93.
[10]
Choi, J.J. and Kwak, S.S. 2014. The Impact of Robot Appearance Types and Robot Behavior Types on People's Perception of a Robot. Journal of Digital Design. 14, 3, 1--11.
[11]
Mann, R. D. 1961. Dimensions of individual performance in small groups under task and social-emotional conditions. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 62, 3, 674--682.
[12]
Tuckman, B. W. 1965. Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological bulletin. 63, 6, 384--399.
[13]
Leidner, R. 1999. Emotional labor in service work. The ANNALS of the American Academy of political and Social Science. 561, 1, 81--95.
[14]
Lee, M.K., Kiesler, S., Forlizzi, J., Srinivasa, S., Rybski, P. 2010. Gracefully mitigating breakdowns in robotic services. In Proc. of the HRI. 203--210.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
HRI'15 Extended Abstracts: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Extended Abstracts
March 2015
336 pages
ISBN:9781450333184
DOI:10.1145/2701973
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 March 2015

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. human-oriented robot
  2. human-robot interaction
  3. product-oriented robot
  4. social context
  5. task-oriented context

Qualifiers

  • Abstract

Conference

HRI '15
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

HRI'15 Extended Abstracts Paper Acceptance Rate 92 of 102 submissions, 90%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 192 of 519 submissions, 37%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 283
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)22
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 29 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media