Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2793107.2810299acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pageschi-playConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

How Can I Interact?: Comparing Full Body Gesture Visualizations

Published: 05 October 2015 Publication History

Abstract

This paper is dedicated to the question "How can I interact?", which may arise during a full body interaction game. To answer this question, a game needs to tell the players what actions are available and how those actions can be triggered. We focus on the video channel and use onscreen symbols to visualize how available input gestures have to be performed. We describe three symbol variants using recordings of a real person: color images, tracking shapes and skeletons, and solely tracking skeletons. An initial evaluation study shows clear advantages for the color images. We further outline how we extend the current implementation, for both improving the usability of the symbols, as well as easing their development.

References

[1]
Anderson, F., Grossman, T., Matejka, J., and Fitzmaurice, G. YouMove: Enhancing movement training with an augmented reality mirror. In Proc. UIST 2013, ACM (New York, 2013), 311--320.
[2]
Guigar, B. The Everything Cartooning Book: Create Unique And Inspired Cartoons For Fun And Profit. Everything Books, 2004.
[3]
Kistler, F., and André, E. User-defined body gestures for an interactive storytelling scenario. In Human-Computer Interaction -- INTERACT 2013, Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2013), 264--281.
[4]
Portillo-Rodriguez, O., Sandoval-Gonzalez, O., Ruffaldi, E., Leonardi, R., Avizzano, C., and Bergamasco, M. Real-time gesture recognition, evaluation and feed-forward correction of a multimodal Tai-Chi platform. In Haptic and Audio Interaction Design, Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2008), 30--39.
[5]
Tang, R., Alizadeh, H., Tang, A., Bateman, S., and Jorge, J. A. Physio@Home: Design explorations to support movement guidance. In Proc. CHI EA 2014, ACM (New York, 2014), 1651--1656.
[6]
Velloso, E., Bulling, A., and Gellersen, H. MotionMA: Motion modelling and analysis by demonstration. In Proc. CHI 2013, ACM (New York, 2013), 1309--1318.
[7]
Walter, R., Bailly, G., and Müller, J. StrikeAPose: Revealing mid-air gestures on public displays. In Proc. CHI 2013, ACM (New York, 2013), 841--850.
[8]
Zafrulla, Z., Brashear, H., Starner, T., Hamilton, H., and Presti, P. American sign language recognition with the Kinect. In Proc. ICMI 2011, ACM (New York, 2011), 279--286.
[9]
Zhao, W., Feng, H., Lun, R., Espy, D., and Reinthal, M. A Kinect-based rehabilitation exercise monitoring and guidance system. In Proc. ICSESS 2014 (2014), 762--765.

Cited By

View all
  • (2017)Academic methods for usability evaluation of serious gamesMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-016-3845-976:4(5755-5784)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2017

Index Terms

  1. How Can I Interact?: Comparing Full Body Gesture Visualizations

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI PLAY '15: Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play
    October 2015
    852 pages
    ISBN:9781450334662
    DOI:10.1145/2793107
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 05 October 2015

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. full body interaction
    2. gesture
    3. visualization

    Qualifiers

    • Work in progress

    Conference

    CHI PLAY '15
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    CHI PLAY '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 40 of 144 submissions, 28%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 421 of 1,386 submissions, 30%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 14 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2017)Academic methods for usability evaluation of serious gamesMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-016-3845-976:4(5755-5784)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2017

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media