Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2786451.2786467acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebsciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Ranking Buildings and Mining the Web for Popular Architectural Patterns

Published: 28 June 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Knowledge about the reception of architectural structures is crucial for architects and urban planners. Yet obtaining such information has been a challenging and costly activity. However, with the advent of the Web, a vast amount of structured and unstructured data describing architectural structures has become available publicly. This includes information about the perception and use of buildings (for instance, through social media), and structured information about the building's features and characteristics (for instance, through public Linked Data). Hence, first mining (i) the popularity of buildings from the social Web and (ii) then correlating such rankings with certain features of buildings, can provide an efficient method to identify successful architectural patterns. In this paper we propose an approach to rank buildings through the automated mining of Flickr metadata. By further correlating such rankings with building properties described in Linked Data we are able to identify popular patterns for particular building types (airports, bridges, churches, halls, and skyscrapers). Our approach combines crowdsourcing with Web mining techniques to establish influential factors, as well as ground truth to evaluate our rankings. Our extensive experimental results depict that methods tailored to specific structure types allow an accurate measurement of their public perception.

References

[1]
S. Bird. Nltk: the natural language toolkit. In Proceedings of the COLING/ACL on Interactive presentation sessions, pages 69--72. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2006.
[2]
P. M. Bluyssen, C. Cox, N. Boschi, M. Maroni, G. Raw, C. Roulet, and F. Foradini. European project hope (health optimisation protocol for energy-efficient buildings). In Healthy Buildings, volume 1, pages 76--81, 2003.
[3]
W. Chow. Proposed fire safety ranking system eb-fsrs for existing high-rise nonresidential buildings in hong kong. Journal of architectural engineering, 8(4):116--124, 2002.
[4]
W.-T. Chu, Y.-K. Chen, and K.-T. Chen. Size does matter: how image size affects aesthetic perception? In Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Multimedia, pages 53--62. ACM, 2013.
[5]
U. Gadiraju, R. Kawase, and S. Dietze. Extracting architectural patterns from web data. In Proceedings of the ISWC 2014 Posters & Demonstrations Track a track within the 13th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2014, Riva del Garda, Italy, October 21, 2014., pages 461--464, 2014.
[6]
U. Gadiraju, R. Kawase, S. Dietze, and G. Demartini. Understanding malicious behavior in crowdsourcing platforms: The case of online surveys. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2015, Seoul, Republic of Korea, April 18--23, 2015, pages 1631--1640, 2015.
[7]
B. Hillier. Space is the machine: a configurational theory of architecture. 2007.
[8]
T. Joachims. Optimizing search engines using clickthrough data. In Proceedings of the Eighth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD '02, pages 133--142, New York, NY, USA, 2002. ACM.
[9]
L. Kennedy, M. Naaman, S. Ahern, R. Nair, and T. Rattenbury. How flickr helps us make sense of the world: context and content in community-contributed media collections. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Multimedia, pages 631--640. ACM, 2007.
[10]
M. Kobes, I. Helsloot, B. de Vries, and J. G. Post. Building safety and human behaviour in fire: A literature review. Fire Safety Journal, 45(1):1--11, 2010.
[11]
M. Kordjamshidi. House Rating Schemes. Springer, 2011.
[12]
N. Lathia, D. Quercia, and J. Crowcroft. The hidden image of the city: sensing community well-being from urban mobility. In Pervasive Computing, pages 91--98. Springer, 2012.
[13]
K. M. Leyden, A. Goldberg, and P. Michelbach. Understanding the pursuit of happiness in ten major cities. Urban Affairs Review, 47(6):861--888, 2011.
[14]
T.-Y. Liu. Learning to Rank for Information Retrieval. Springer, 2011.
[15]
S. M. Mohammad and P. D. Turney. Emotions evoked by common words and phrases: Using mechanical turk to create an emotion lexicon. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Computational Approaches to Analysis and Generation of Emotion in Text, pages 26--34. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2010.
[16]
S. M. Mohammad and P. D. Turney. Crowdsourcing a word--emotion association lexicon. Computational Intelligence, 2012.
[17]
E. Ng. Designing high-density cities for social and environmental sustainability. Earthscan, 2010.
[18]
J. Oomen and L. Aroyo. Crowdsourcing in the cultural heritage domain: opportunities and challenges. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Communities and Technologies, pages 138--149. ACM, 2011.
[19]
I. Oppenheim, H. Mühlmann, G. Blechinger, I. W. Mothersill, P. Hilfiker, H. Jokeit, M. Kurthen, G. Krämer, and T. Grunwald. Brain electrical responses to high-and low-ranking buildings. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience, 40(3):157--161, 2009.
[20]
I. Oppenheim, M. Vannucci, H. Mühlmann, R. Gabriel, H. Jokeit, M. Kurthen, G. Krämer, and T. Grunwald. Hippocampal contributions to the processing of architectural ranking. NeuroImage, 50(2):742--752, 2010.
[21]
C. Orellana-Rodriguez, E. Diaz-Aviles, and W. Nejdl. Mining emotions in short films: user comments or crowdsourcing? In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web companion, pages 69--70. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 2013.
[22]
R. Plutchik. A General Psychoevolutionary Theory of Emotion. Academic press, New York, 1980.
[23]
D. Quercia. Urban: crowdsourcing for the good of london. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web companion, pages 591--592. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 2013.
[24]
D. Quercia, J. P. Pesce, V. Almeida, and J. Crowcroft. Psychological maps 2.0: A web engagement enterprise starting in london. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web, pages 1065--1076. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 2013.
[25]
C.-A. Roulet, F. Flourentzou, H. Labben, M. Santamouris, I. Koronaki, E. Dascalaki, and V. Richalet. Orme: A multicriteria rating methodology for buildings. Building and Environment, 37(6):579--586, 2002.
[26]
C.-A. Roulet, N. Johner, F. Flourentzous, and G. Greuter. European project hope (health optimisation protocol for energy-efficient buildings). In Healthy Buildings, volume 1, 2003.
[27]
S. Siersdorfer, E. Minack, F. Deng, and J. Hare. Analyzing and predicting sentiment of images on the social web. In Proceedings of the international conference on Multimedia, pages 715--718. ACM, 2010.
[28]
C. Sitte. City planning according to artistic principles. Rizzoli, 1986.
[29]
L. H. Sullivan. The autobiography of an idea, volume 281. Courier Dover Publications, 1956.
[30]
K. T. Tsang. Stochastic quantitative fire risk assessment on old buildings in hong kong. 2012.

Cited By

View all
  • (2016)Enrichment and Preservation of Architectural Knowledge3D Research Challenges in Cultural Heritage II10.1007/978-3-319-47647-6_11(231-255)Online publication date: 2-Oct-2016

Index Terms

  1. Ranking Buildings and Mining the Web for Popular Architectural Patterns

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      WebSci '15: Proceedings of the ACM Web Science Conference
      June 2015
      366 pages
      ISBN:9781450336727
      DOI:10.1145/2786451
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 28 June 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Architectural Structures
      2. Crowdsourcing
      3. Influential Factors
      4. Perception
      5. Web Mining

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Conference

      WebSci '15
      Sponsor:
      WebSci '15: ACM Web Science Conference
      June 28 - July 1, 2015
      Oxford, United Kingdom

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 245 of 933 submissions, 26%

      Upcoming Conference

      Websci '25
      17th ACM Web Science Conference
      May 20 - 24, 2025
      New Brunswick , NJ , USA

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2016)Enrichment and Preservation of Architectural Knowledge3D Research Challenges in Cultural Heritage II10.1007/978-3-319-47647-6_11(231-255)Online publication date: 2-Oct-2016

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media