Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2775441.2775476acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Leading participant-centered research: an argument for taking a more strategic role as user experience architects

Published: 16 July 2015 Publication History

Abstract

In this experience report, we discuss our experiences in negotiating participant-based research in industry projects. For the past twenty years, academics and practitioners of participant-based research have worked to integrate practices and methods to improve the user experience of products and services. While it is clear that industry is seeing value in participant-centered research, there are difficulties in putting it into practice. Building upon prior research on methods with a firm foundation in technical communication and our experiences working on product teams, we argue that recognizing similarities of method across disparate schools of thought is one way to lead as experience architects. The goal of this work is to propose that we think and act in more strategic ways about participant-centered research as we work with product marketing and service development across our organizations. By reconsidering this work and our roles, we can work across organizations to guide and lead research that can benefit the organization as user experience architects, much in the same way that content strategists have met with success.

References

[1]
"A Book Apart Brief Books for People Who Make Websites." A Book Apart Press Room RSS. N.p., n.d. Web. 01 May 2015. <http://abookapart.com/>.
[2]
Alvarez, Cindy. Lean Customer Development: Building Products Your Customers Will Buy. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media, 2014. Print.
[3]
Beyer, Hugh, and Karen Holtzblatt. Contextual Design: Defining Customer-centered Systems. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 1998. Print.
[4]
Christensen, Clayton M., and Michael E. Raynor. The Innovator's Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School, 2003. Print.
[5]
Coe, Marlana. Human Factors for Technical Communicators. New York: Wiley, 1996. Print.
[6]
Cooper, Alan. About Face. 1st ed. New York: Hungry Minds, 1995. Print.
[7]
Cooper, Alan. The Inmates Are Running the Asylum. Indianapolis, IN: Sams, 1999. Print.
[8]
Courage, Catherine, and Kathy Baxter. Understanding Your Users: A Practical Guide to User Requirements Methods, Tools, and Techniques. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 2005. Print.
[9]
Croll, Alistair, and Benjamin Yoskovitz. Lean Analytics: Use Data to Build a Better Startup Faster. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly, 2013. Print.
[10]
Foxworthy, Jim. "One Bowl at a Time." Pragmatic Marketing, n.d. Web. 04 May 2015. <http://pragmaticmarketing.com/resources/one-bowl-at-a-time>.
[11]
Gothelf, Jeff, and Josh Seiden. Lean UX: Applying Lean Principles to Improve User Experience. N.p.: n.p., n.d. Print.
[12]
Hall, Erika. Just Enough Research. New York.: A Book Apart, 2013. Print.
[13]
Halvorson, Kristina. Content Strategy for the Web. Berkeley, CA: New Riders, 2010. Print.
[14]
Hackos, JoAnn T., and Janice Redish. User and Task Analysis for Interface Design. New York: Wiley, 1998. Print.
[15]
Humble, Jez, Joanne Molesky, and Barry O'Reilly. Lean Enterprise. N.p.: n.p., n.d. Print.
[16]
Klein, Laura. UX for Lean Startups: Faster, Smarter User Experience Research and Design. Farnham: O'Reilly, 2013. Print.
[17]
Laurel, Brenda, and S. Joy. Mountford. The Art of Human-computer Interface Design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Pub., 1990. Print.
[18]
Maurya, Ash. Running Lean: Iterate from Plan A to a Plan That Works. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly, 2012. Print.
[19]
Nielsen, Jakob. Usability Engineering. Boston: Academic, 1993. Print.
[20]
"Nielsen Norman Group." UX Without Users Is Not UX. N.p., n.d. Web. 03 May 2015. <http://www.nngroup.com/articles/ux-without-user-research/>.
[21]
Norman, Donald A. The Psychology of Everyday Things. New York: Basic, 1988. Print.
[22]
Norman, Don. The Design of Everyday Things Revised and Expanded Edition. New York: Basic, 2013. Print.
[23]
Portigal, Steve. Interviewing Users: How to Uncover Compelling Insights. New York: Rosenfeld Media, 2013. Print.
[24]
Potts, Liza, and Gerianne Bartocci. "<Methods>Experience Design</Methods>." SIGDOC '09 (2009): 17--22. Web.
[25]
Potts, Liza. Social Media in Disaster Response: How Experience Architects Can Build for Participation. New York: Routledge, 2013. Print.
[26]
Quesenbery, Whitney, and Kevin Brooks. Storytelling for User Experience Crafting Stories for Better Design. Brooklyn, NY: Rosenfeld Media, 2010. Print.
[27]
Ries, Eric. "The Lean Startup Conference." The Lean Startup Conference. Lean Startup Co, n.d. Web. 02 May 2015. <http://2015.leanstartup.co/>.
[28]
Ries, Eric. The Lean Startup: How Today's Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses. New York: Crown Business, 2011. Print.
[29]
Rosenfeld, Lou. "Seeing the Elephant: Defragmenting User Research." A List Apart. A List Apart, 27 Aug. 2013. Web. 02 May 2015. <http://alistapart.com/article/seeing-the-elephant-defragmenting-user-research>.
[30]
"Rosenfeld Media | User Experience Books, Training, Workshops, Seminars, and Experts." Rosenfeld Media. N.p., n.d. Web. 04 May 2015. <http://rosenfeldmedia.com/>.
[31]
Rubin, Jeffrey. Handbook of Usability Testing: How to Plan, Design, and Conduct Effective Tests. New York: Wiley, 1994. Print.
[32]
Sharon, Tomer. It's Our Research: Getting Stakeholder Buy-in for User Experience Research Projects. Waltham, MA: Morgan Kaufmann, 2012. Print.
[33]
Spool, Jared. "It's a Great Time to Be A UX Designer by Jared M. Spool -- An Event Apart Austin." Vimeo. An Event Apart, 23 Apr. 2014. Web. 04 May 2015. <https://vimeo.com/92744606>.
[34]
Sullivan, P. "Beyond a Narrow Conception of Usability Testing." IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 32.4 (1989): 256--64. Web.
[35]
Ulwick, Anthony W. What Customers Want: Using Outcome-driven Innovation to Create Breakthrough Products and Services. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2005. Print.
[36]
"Why Pragmatic Marketing?" Why Pragmatic Marketing. Pragmatic Marketing, n.d. Web. 04 May 2015. <http://pragmaticmarketing.com/about-us/about-us>.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Leading participant-centered research: an argument for taking a more strategic role as user experience architects

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGDOC '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual International Conference on the Design of Communication
    July 2015
    239 pages
    ISBN:9781450336482
    DOI:10.1145/2775441
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    • Arizona State University: Arizona State University
    • North Dakota State University: North Dakota State University
    • University of Limerick: University of Limerick
    • Chongqing Acad. Sci. Technol.: Chongqing Academy of Science and Technology
    • Microsoft Research: Microsoft Research
    • XA: Experience Architecture Program, Michigan State University
    • Iowa State University: Iowa State University
    • SIGDOC: ACM Special Interest Group for Design of Communications
    • University of Central Florida: University of Central Florida

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 16 July 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. experience architecture
    2. usability testing
    3. user experience
    4. user research
    5. user testing

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    SIGDOC '15
    Sponsor:
    • Arizona State University
    • North Dakota State University
    • University of Limerick
    • Chongqing Acad. Sci. Technol.
    • Microsoft Research
    • XA
    • Iowa State University
    • SIGDOC
    • University of Central Florida

    Acceptance Rates

    SIGDOC '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 49 of 82 submissions, 60%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 355 of 582 submissions, 61%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 19 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media