Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2750858.2806064acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Attitudes toward vehicle-based sensing and recording

Published: 07 September 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Vehicles increasingly include features that rely on hi-tech sensors and recording; however, little is known of public attitudes toward such recording. We use two studies, an online survey (n=349) and an interview-based study (n=15), to examine perceptions of vehicle-based sensing and recording. We focus on: 1) how vehicle-based recording and sensing may differ from perceptions of current recording; 2) factors that impact comfort with vehicle-based recording for hypothetical drivers versus bystanders; and 3) perceptions of potential privacy-preserving techniques. We find that vehicle-based recording challenges current mental models of recording awareness. Comfort tends to depend on perceived benefits, which can vary by stakeholder type. Perceived privacy in spaces near cars can also impact comfort and reflect mental models of private spaces as well as the range of potentially sensitive activities people perform in and near cars. Privacy-preserving techniques may increase perceived comfort but may require addressing trust and usability issues.

References

[1]
Privacy and security: For Street View. http://www.google.com/maps/about/behind-thes-cenes/streetview/privacy/#streetview.
[2]
Onstar services. https://www.onstar.com/us/en/services/services.html, 2014.
[3]
Abowd, G. D., Hayes, G. R., Iachello, G., Kientz, J. A., Patel, S. N., Stevens, M. M., and Truong, K. N. Prototypes and paratypes: Designing mobile and ubiquitous computing applications. Pervasive Computing, IEEE 4, 4 (2005), 67--73.
[4]
Barhm, M. S., Qwasmi, N., Qureshi, F. Z., and El-Khatib, K. Negotiating privacy preferences in video surveillance systems. In Modern Approaches in Applied Intelligence. Springer, 2011, 511--521.
[5]
Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., and Lenz, G. S. Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis 20, 3 (2012), 351--368.
[6]
Billson, J. M. Conducting focus group research across cultures: Consistency and comparability. UK: ESRC Research Group on Wellbeing in Developing Countries (2006).
[7]
Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., and Gosling, S. D. Amazon's Mechanical Turk a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science 6, 1 (2011), 3--5.
[8]
Choe, E. K., Consolvo, S., Jung, J., Harrison, B., and Kientz, J. A. Living in a glass house: A survey of private moments in the home. In Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, ACM (2011), 41--44.
[9]
Choe, E. K., Consolvo, S., Jung, J., Harrison, B., Patel, S. N., and Kientz, J. A. Investigating receptiveness to sensing and inference in the home using sensor proxies. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, ACM (2012), 61--70.
[10]
Consolvo, S., and Walker, M. Using the experience sampling method to evaluate ubicomp applications. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 2 (2003), 24--31.
[11]
Denning, T., Dehlawi, Z., and Kohno, T. In situ with bystanders of augmented reality glasses: Perspectives on recording and privacy-mediating technologies. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2014), 2377--2386.
[12]
Friedman, B., Kahn Jr, P. H., Hagman, J., Severson, R. L., and Gill, B. The watcher and the watched: Social judgments about privacy in a public place. Human-Computer Interaction 21, 2 (2006), 235--272.
[13]
Iachello, G., Truong, K. N., Abowd, G. D., Hayes, G. R., and Stevens, M. Prototyping and sampling experience to evaluate ubiquitous computing privacy in the real world. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, ACM (2006), 1009--1018.
[14]
Ion, I., Sachdeva, N., Kumaraguru, P., and Čapkun, S. Home is safer than the cloud!: Privacy concerns for consumer cloud storage. In Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security, ACM (2011), 13.
[15]
Ipeirotis, P. Turker demographics vs internet demographics, 2009.
[16]
Kessler, A. M., and Vlasic, B. Semiautonomous driving arrives, feature by feature. New York Times, April 2015.
[17]
Massimi, M., Truong, K. N., Dearman, D., and Hayes, G. R. Understanding recording technologies in everyday life. Pervasive Computing, IEEE 9, 3 (2010), 64--71.
[18]
Mennicken, S., and Huang, E. M. Hacking the natural habitat: An in-the-wild study of smart homes, their development, and the people who live in them. In Pervasive Computing. Springer, 2012, 143--160.
[19]
NASA. Prepping advanced driver assistance for mainstream vehicles. NASA Tech Briefs, September 2014.
[20]
Neubecker, R. Lower your car insurance bill, at the price of some privacy. New York Times, August 2014.
[21]
Nguyen, D. H., Bedford, A., Bretana, A. G., and Hayes, G. R. Situating the concern for information privacy through an empirical study of responses to video recording. In Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2011), 3207--3216.
[22]
Nguyen, D. H., Marcu, G., Hayes, G. R., Truong, K. N., Scott, J., Langheinrich, M., and Roduner, C. Encountering SenseCam: Personal recording technologies in everyday life. In Proceedings of the 2009 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, ACM (2009), 165--174.
[23]
Norberg, P. A., Horne, D. R., and Horne, D. A. The privacy paradox: Personal information disclosure intentions versus behaviors. Journal of Consumer Affairs 41, 1 (2007), 100--126.
[24]
Oulasvirta, A., Pihlajamaa, A., Perki, J., Ray, D., Vhkangas, T., Hasu, T., Vainio, N., and Myllymki, P. Long-term effects of ubiquitous surveillance in the home. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, ACM (2012), 41--50.
[25]
Pickler, N. 'Smart car' tech encouraged in U.S. ABC News, July 2014.
[26]
Procyk, J., Neustaedter, C., Pang, C., Tang, A., and Judge, T. K. Exploring video streaming in public settings: Shared geocaching over distance using mobile video chat. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2014), 2163--2172.
[27]
Schnorf, S., Sedley, A., Ortlieb, M., and Woodruff, A. A comparison of six sample providers regarding online privacy benchmarks. In SOUPS Workshop on Privacy Personas and Segmentation (2014).
[28]
Thomaz, E., Parnami, A., Bidwell, J., Essa, I., and Abowd, G. D. Technological approaches for addressing privacy concerns when recognizing eating behaviors with wearable cameras. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, ACM (2013), 739--748.
[29]
Thomaz, E., Parnami, A., Bidwell, J., Essa, I., and Abowd, G. D. Technological approaches for addressing privacy concerns when recognizing eating behaviors with wearable cameras. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, ACM (2013), 739--748.
[30]
Trop, J. A black box for car crashes. New York Times, July 2013.
[31]
Tuttle, B. Big data is my copilot: Auto insureres push devices that track driving habits. Time, August 2013.
[32]
Vanderhulst, G., Van den Broeck, M., and Kawsar, F. Exploring the design space for geo-fenced connected devices and services at home. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct Publication, ACM (2014), 1321--1327.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Understand users' privacy perception and decision of V2X communication in connected autonomous vehiclesProceedings of the 32nd USENIX Conference on Security Symposium10.5555/3620237.3620404(2975-2992)Online publication date: 9-Aug-2023
  • (2022)Exploring Bystanders’ Privacy Concerns with Smart Homes in JordanProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3502097(1-24)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
  • (2020)CarOSenseProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/34118204:3(1-28)Online publication date: 4-Sep-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Attitudes toward vehicle-based sensing and recording

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    UbiComp '15: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing
    September 2015
    1302 pages
    ISBN:9781450335744
    DOI:10.1145/2750858
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 07 September 2015

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. attitudes
    2. cameras
    3. cars
    4. perceived benefits
    5. privacy
    6. privacy-preserving mechanisms
    7. recording
    8. sensors
    9. vehicles

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    UbiComp '15
    Sponsor:
    • Yahoo! Japan
    • SIGMOBILE
    • FX Palo Alto Laboratory, Inc.
    • ACM
    • Rakuten Institute of Technology
    • Microsoft
    • Bell Labs
    • SIGCHI
    • Panasonic
    • Telefónica
    • ISTC-PC

    Acceptance Rates

    UbiComp '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 101 of 394 submissions, 26%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 764 of 2,912 submissions, 26%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)89
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)20
    Reflects downloads up to 27 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Understand users' privacy perception and decision of V2X communication in connected autonomous vehiclesProceedings of the 32nd USENIX Conference on Security Symposium10.5555/3620237.3620404(2975-2992)Online publication date: 9-Aug-2023
    • (2022)Exploring Bystanders’ Privacy Concerns with Smart Homes in JordanProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3502097(1-24)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
    • (2020)CarOSenseProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/34118204:3(1-28)Online publication date: 4-Sep-2020
    • (2020)Dashcam Witness: Video Sharing Motives and Privacy Concerns Across Different NationsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2020.30020798(110425-110437)Online publication date: 2020
    • (2018)CampusWatchProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/32744032:CSCW(1-25)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2018
    • (2017)Self-driving cars and data collectionProceedings of the Thirteenth USENIX Conference on Usable Privacy and Security10.5555/3235924.3235953(357-375)Online publication date: 12-Jul-2017
    • (2017)Facilitating Pervasive Community Policing on the Road with Mobile RoadwatchProceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3025453.3025867(3538-3550)Online publication date: 2-May-2017
    • (2017)Spiders in the SkyProceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3025453.3025632(6765-6776)Online publication date: 2-May-2017
    • (2016)Motives and Concerns of Dashcam Video SharingProceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/2858036.2858581(4758-4769)Online publication date: 7-May-2016

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Login options

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media