Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2746194.2746212acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshotsosConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Towards quantification of firewall policy complexity

Published: 21 April 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Developing metrics for quantifying the security and usability aspects of a system has been of constant interest to the cybersecurity research community. Such metrics have the potential to provide valuable insight on security and usability of a system and to aid in the design, development, testing, and maintenance of the system. Working towards the overarching goal of such metric development, in this work we lay down the groundwork for developing metrics for quantifying the complexity of firewall policies. We are particularly interested in capturing the human perceived complexity of firewall policies. To this end, we propose a potential workflow that researchers can follow to develop empirically-validated, objective metrics for measuring the complexity of firewall policies. We also propose three hypotheses that capture salient properties of a firewall policy which constitute the complexity of a policy for a human user. We identify two categories of human-perceived policy complexity (i.e., syntactic complexity and semantic complexity), and for each of them propose potential complexity metrics for firewall policies that exploit two of the hypotheses we suggest. The current work can be viewed as a stepping stone for future research on development of such policy complexity metrics.

References

[1]
H. B. Acharya, A. Joshi, and M. G. Gouda. Firewall modules and modular firewalls. In Proceedings of the The 18th IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols, ICNP '10, 2010.
[2]
S. Al-Haj and E. Al-Shaer. Measuring firewall security. In 4th Symposium on Configuration Analytics and Automation, SafeConfig'11, 2011.
[3]
W. Jansen. Directions in security metrics research. DIANE Publishing, 2010.
[4]
A. N. Kolmogorov. On tables of random numbers. Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A, 25(4), Dec. 1963.
[5]
A. N. Kolmogorov. On tables of random numbers. Theor. Comput. Sci., 207(2), Nov. 1998.
[6]
A. Tongaonkar, N. Inamdar, and R. Sekar. Inferring higher level policies from firewall rules. In Proceedings of the 21st Conference on Large Installation System Administration Conference, LISA'07, pages 2:1--2:10, 2007.
[7]
T. Wong. On the usability of firewall configuration, 2008. http://cups.cs.cmu.edu/soups/2008/USM/wong.pdf.
[8]
A. Wool. A quantitative study of firewall configuration errors. Computer, 37(6): 62--67, June 2004.
[9]
A. Wool. Trends in firewall configuration errors: Measuring the holes in swiss cheese. IEEE Internet Computing, 14(4): 58--65, July 2010.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
HotSoS '15: Proceedings of the 2015 Symposium and Bootcamp on the Science of Security
April 2015
170 pages
ISBN:9781450333764
DOI:10.1145/2746194
  • General Chair:
  • David Nicol
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

  • US Army Research Office: US Army Research Office
  • NSF: National Science Foundation
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  • National Security Agency: National Security Agency

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 April 2015

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. firewall policies
  2. policy complexity metrics

Qualifiers

  • Poster

Conference

HotSoS '15
Sponsor:
  • US Army Research Office
  • NSF
  • National Security Agency

Acceptance Rates

HotSoS '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 13 of 22 submissions, 59%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 34 of 60 submissions, 57%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 18 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media