Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2619239.2626295acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free access

Measuring IPv6 adoption

Published: 17 August 2014 Publication History

Abstract

After several IPv4 address exhaustion milestones in the last three years, it is becoming apparent that the world is running out of IPv4 addresses, and the adoption of the next generation Internet protocol, IPv6, though nascent, is accelerating. In order to better understand this unique and disruptive transition, we explore twelve metrics using ten global-scale datasets to create the longest and broadest measurement of IPv6 adoption to date. Using this perspective, we find that adoption, relative to IPv4, varies by two orders of magnitude depending on the measure examined and that care must be taken when evaluating adoption metrics in isolation. Further, we find that regional adoption is not uniform. Finally, and perhaps most surprisingly, we find that over the last three years, the nature of IPv6 utilization-in terms of traffic, content, reliance on transition technology, and performance-has shifted dramatically from prior findings, indicating a maturing of the protocol into production mode. We believe IPv6's recent growth and this changing utilization signal a true quantum leap.

References

[1]
ALEXA. Alexa Top 1M Sites on 2012-10-02. http://www.alexa.com/topsites.
[2]
ALLMAN, M. IPv6 DNS & Reachability Dataset. http://www.icir.org/mallman/data/ipv6-dns-data.tar.gz.
[3]
APNIC PTY. LTD. APNIC's IPv4 Pool Usage, 2012. http://www.apnic.net.
[4]
CAIDA. Archipelago Measurement Infrastructure. http://www.caida.org/projects/ark/.
[5]
CHO, K., LUCKIE, M., AND HUFFAKER, B. Identifying IPv6 Network Problems in the Dual-stack World. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Network Troubleshooting: Research, Theory and Operations Practice Meet Malfunctioning Reality (2004).
[6]
CLAFFY, K. Tracking IPv6 Evolution: Data We Have and Data We Need. SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review (2011).
[7]
COLITTI, L., GUNDERSON, S. H., KLINE, E., AND REFICE, T. Evaluating IPv6 Adoption in the Internet. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Passive and Active Network Measurement. 2010.
[8]
CZYZ, J., ALLMAN, M., ZHANG, J., IEKEL-JOHNSON, S., OSTERWEIL, E., AND BAILEY, M. Measuring IPv6 Adoption. ICSI Technical Report TR-13-004, August 2013.
[9]
DAVIES, J. Domain Name System Client Behavior in Windows Vista. http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb727035.aspx, 2006.
[10]
DHAMDHERE, A., LUCKIE, M., HUFFAKER, B., CLAFFY, K., ELMOKASHFI, A., AND ABEN, E. Measuring the Deployment of IPv6: Topology, Routing and Performance. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement (IMC) (2012).
[11]
FEATHER, C. Network News Transfer Protocol (NNTP), 2006.
[12]
FULLER, V., AND LI, T. RFC4632 - Classless Inter-domain Routing (CIDR): The Internet Address Assignment and Aggregation Plan, 2006.
[13]
GIOTSAS, V., AND ZHOU, S. Detecting and Assessing the Hybrid IPv4/IPv6 AS Relationships. SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review (2011).
[14]
GOOGLE. IPv6 Statistics. http://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics/.
[15]
GREGORI, E., IMPROTA, A., L ENZINI, L., ROSSI, L., AND SANI, L. On the Incompleteness of the AS-level Graph: a Novel Methodology for BGP Route Collector Placement. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Internet Measurement (IMC) (2012).
[16]
GUÉRIN, R., AND HOSANAGAR, K. Fostering IPv6 Migration Through Network Quality Differentials. SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review (2010).
[17]
GÜRSUN, G., RUCHANSKY, N., TERZI, E., AND CROVELLA, M. Inferring Visibility: Who's (Not) Talking to Whom? SIGCOMM Computer Communications Review (2012).
[18]
HEI, Y., AND YAMAZAKI, K. Traffic Analysis and Worldwide Operation of Open 6to4 Relays for IPv6 Deployment. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Applications and the Internet (2004).
[19]
HUITEMA, S. RFC 4380: Teredo: Tunneling IPv6 over UDP through Network Address Translations (NATs), 2006.
[20]
HUSTON, G. The Case for IPv6: Extinction, Evolution or Revolution? http://www.potaroo.net, 2006.
[21]
IANA. IPv6 Addresses for the Root Servers. http://www.iana.org/reports/2008/root-aaaa-announcement.html, 2008.
[22]
INTERNET SOCIETY. Internet Society - World IPv6 Day. http://www.worldipv6day.org/, 2011.
[23]
KARPILOVSKY, E., GERBER, A., PEI, D., REXFORD, J., AND SHAIKH, A. Quantifying the Extent of IPv6 Deployment. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Passive and Active Network Measurement (2009).
[24]
LABOVITZ, C., IEKEL-JOHNSON, S., MCPHERSON, D., OBERHEIDE, J., AND JAHANIAN, F. Internet Inter-Domain Traffic. In Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communications (SIGCOMM) (2010).
[25]
LEBER, M. Global IPv6 Deployment Progress Report. http://bgp.he.net/ipv6-progress-report.cgi, 2014.
[26]
MAHADEVAN, P., KRIOUKOV, D., FOMENKOV, M., DIMITROPOULOS, X., CLAFFY, K.C., AND VAHDAT, A. The Internet AS-level Topology: Three Data Sources and One Definitive Metric. SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review (2006).
[27]
MARSAN, C. Biggest Mistake for IPv6: It's Not Backwards Compatible. http://www.networkworld.com/news/2009/032509-ipv6-mistake.html, 2009.
[28]
MOCKAPETRIS, P., AND DUNLAP, K. J. Development of the Domain Name System. In Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communications (SIGCOMM) (1988).
[29]
NIKKHAH, M., GUÉRIN, R., LEE, Y., AND WOUNDY, R. Assessing IPv6 Through Web Access: A Measurement Study and Its Findings. In Proceedings of the Seventh Conference on emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies (CoNEXT) (2011).
[30]
OSTERWEIL, E., MCPHERSON, D., DIBENEDETTO, S., PAPADOPOULOS, C., AND MASSEY, D. Behavior of DNS? Top Talkers, a .com/.net View. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Passive and Active Network Measurement (2012).
[31]
PLONKA, D., AND BARFORD, P. Assessing Performance of Internet Services on IPv6. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC) (2013).
[32]
RIPE. RIPE Routing Information Service (RIS) Raw data Project. http://www.ripe.net/data-tools/stats/ris/ris-raw-data.
[33]
RIPE NCC. Routing Information Service (RIS). http://www.ripe.net/ris/.
[34]
SARRAR, N., MAIER, G., AGER, B., SOMMER, R., AND UHLIG, S. Investigating IPv6 Traffic - What Happened at the World IPv6 Day? In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Passive and Active Network Measurement (2012).
[35]
SAVOLA, P. Observations of IPv6 Traffic on a 6to4 Relay. SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 35, 1.
[36]
SHEN, W., CHEN, Y., ZHANG, Q., CHEN, Y., DENG, B., LI, X., AND LV, G. Observations of IPv6 traffic. In Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Computing, Communication, Control, and Management (2009).
[37]
SRISURESH, P., AND HOLDREGE, M. RFC2663 - IP Network Address Translator (NAT) Terminology and Considerations, 1999.
[38]
UNIVERSITY OF OREGON. Route Views project. http://www.routeviews.org/.
[39]
WANG, Y., YE, S., AND LI, X. Understanding Current IPv6 Performance: a Measurement Study. In 10th IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (2005).
[40]
WESSELS, D., LARSON, M., AND MANKIN, A. Analysis of Query Traffic to .com/.net Name Servers. http://www.apricot2013.net/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/58884/130226-com-net-query-analysis-for-apricot-2013_1361840547.pdf, 2013. Slides of a talk given at APRICOT, Feb. 19--Mar. 1, Singapore.
[41]
ZANDER, S., ANDREW, L. L., ARMITAGE, G., HUSTON, G., AND MICHAELSON, G. Mitigating Sampling Error When Measuring Internet Client IPv6 Capabilities. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Internet Measurement (IMC) (2012).
[42]
ZHANG, B., LIU, R., MASSEY, D., AND ZHANG, L. Collecting the Internet AS-level Topology. SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review (2005).
[43]
ZHANG, G., QUOITIN, B., AND ZHOU, S. Phase Changes in the Evolution of the IPv4 and IPv6 AS-Level Internet Topologies. Computer Communications 34, 5 (Apr. 2011).
[44]
ZHOU, X., AND VAN MIEGHEM, P. Hopcount and e2e Delay: IPv6 Versus IPv4. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Passive and Active Network Measurement (2005).

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)IoT Bricks Over v6: Understanding IPv6 Usage in Smart HomesProceedings of the 2024 ACM on Internet Measurement Conference10.1145/3646547.3688457(595-611)Online publication date: 4-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Designing, Constructing, and Operating an IPv6 Network at SC23: A case study in implementing the IPv6 protocol on a heterogenous network that supports the SC23 conferencePractice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing 2024: Human Powered Computing10.1145/3626203.3670531(1-8)Online publication date: 17-Jul-2024
  • (2023)Who Squats IPv4 Addresses?ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review10.1145/3594255.359426053:1(48-72)Online publication date: 20-Apr-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGCOMM '14: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM conference on SIGCOMM
August 2014
662 pages
ISBN:9781450328364
DOI:10.1145/2619239
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 17 August 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. IP
  2. IPv4
  3. IPv6
  4. dns
  5. internet
  6. measurement

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

SIGCOMM'14
Sponsor:
SIGCOMM'14: ACM SIGCOMM 2014 Conference
August 17 - 22, 2014
Illinois, Chicago, USA

Acceptance Rates

SIGCOMM '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 45 of 242 submissions, 19%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 462 of 3,389 submissions, 14%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)301
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)74
Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)IoT Bricks Over v6: Understanding IPv6 Usage in Smart HomesProceedings of the 2024 ACM on Internet Measurement Conference10.1145/3646547.3688457(595-611)Online publication date: 4-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Designing, Constructing, and Operating an IPv6 Network at SC23: A case study in implementing the IPv6 protocol on a heterogenous network that supports the SC23 conferencePractice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing 2024: Human Powered Computing10.1145/3626203.3670531(1-8)Online publication date: 17-Jul-2024
  • (2023)Who Squats IPv4 Addresses?ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review10.1145/3594255.359426053:1(48-72)Online publication date: 20-Apr-2023
  • (2023)Measuring DNS-over-Encryption Performance Over IPv62023 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom)10.1109/TrustCom60117.2023.00075(444-451)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2023
  • (2023)The Closed Resolver Project: Measuring the Deployment of Inbound Source Address ValidationIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking10.1109/TNET.2023.325741331:6(2589-2603)Online publication date: Dec-2023
  • (2023)How Ready is DNS for an IPv6-Only World?Passive and Active Measurement10.1007/978-3-031-28486-1_22(525-549)Online publication date: 21-Mar-2023
  • (2022)IPswen: A Long Term Evolution Approach for the IPv4 Internet Architecture2022 IFIP Networking Conference (IFIP Networking)10.23919/IFIPNetworking55013.2022.9829762(1-9)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2022
  • (2021)SailfishProceedings of the 2021 ACM SIGCOMM 2021 Conference10.1145/3452296.3472889(194-206)Online publication date: 9-Aug-2021
  • (2021)6GAN: IPv6 Multi-Pattern Target Generation via Generative Adversarial Nets with Reinforcement LearningIEEE INFOCOM 2021 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications10.1109/INFOCOM42981.2021.9488912(1-10)Online publication date: 10-May-2021
  • (2021)Plight at the End of the TunnelPassive and Active Measurement10.1007/978-3-030-72582-2_23(390-405)Online publication date: 30-Mar-2021
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media