Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2612733.2612740acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesdg-oConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Social media adoption: toward a representative, responsive or interactive government?

Published: 18 June 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Social media adoption is oftentimes seen as technologically determined by third parties outside of government, with government's role limited to reactively jump on the bandwagon and respond to citizen preferences. However, social media interactions are emergent and challenging existing bureaucratic norms and regulations. This paper provides empirical evidence for the institutionalization stages government agencies' move through when they are adopting new technologies. Adoption occurs at varying degrees of formalization and not all departments in the U.S. executive branch regulate and restrict the use of new technologies in the same way. The internal procedural and organizational changes that occur during the adoption process are extracted using qualitative interviews with social media directors in the 15 departments which received the executive order to "harness new technologies" in order to make the U.S. government more transparent, participatory and collaborative. In addition to the perceptions of federal social media directors, a process tracing approach was used to map the accompanying governance and institutional changes and follow-up orders to direct the adoption of social media. Tracing both the behavior of individual organizations as well as the institutional top-down responses, this paper is both relevant for academics as well as practitioners. It provides the basis for future large-scale research studies across all levels of government, as well as insights into the black box of organizational responses to a top-down political mandate.

References

[1]
D. Cogburn and F. K. Espinoza-Vasquez, "From Networked Nominee to Networked Nation: Examining the Impact of Web 2.0 and Social Media on Political Participation and Civic Engagement in the 2008 Obama Campaign," Journal of Political Marketing, vol. 10, pp. 189--213, 2009.
[2]
C. Shirky, "The Political Power of Social Media: Technology, the Public Sphere, and Political Change," Foreign Affairs, vol. January/February 2011, 2011.
[3]
A. Smith, "The Internet's Role in the Campaign 2008," Washington, D.C.2009.
[4]
Alexa. (2014). Twitter.com Alexa Traffic Ranks. Available: http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/twitter.com
[5]
B. Obama. (2009, Transparency and Open Government: Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies. Whitehouse Blog. Available: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/TransparencyandOpenGovernment/
[6]
The White House. (2012, Digital Government: Building a 21st Century Platform to Better Serve the American People. Available: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/egov/digital-government/digital-government-strategy.pdf
[7]
Government Accountability Office, "Social Media: Federal Agencies Need Policies and Procedures for Managing and Protecting Information They Access and Disseminate," vol. GAO-11-605, GAO, Ed., ed. Washington, DC: http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-11-605, 2011.
[8]
I. Mergel, Social Media in the Public Sector: Participation, Collabroation, and Transparency in the Networked World. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Wiley, 2012.
[9]
I. Mergel, "A manager's guide to designing social media strategies in the public sector," Washington, D.C.2012.
[10]
I. Mergel, "A framework for interpreting social media interactions in the public sector," Government Information Quarterly, vol. 30, pp. 327--334, 2013.
[11]
A. Kavenaugh, E. A. Fox, S. Sheetz, S. Yang, L. T. Li, T. Whalen, et al., "Social Media Use in Government: From the Routine to the Critical," in The Proceedings of the 12th Annual Inernational Conference on Digital Government Research, dg.O'11, College Park, MD, USA, 2011.
[12]
E. M. Rogers and F. F. Shoemaker, Communication of Innovations: A Cross-Cultural Approach. New York: Free Press, 1971.
[13]
R. L. Nolan, "Managing the computer resource: A stage hypothesis," Communications fo the ACM, vol. 16, pp. 399--405, 1973.
[14]
D. Coursey and D. F. Norris, "Models of E-Government: Are They Correct? An Empirical Assessment," Public Administration Review, vol. 68, pp. 523--536, 05 2008.
[15]
J. E. Fountain, Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change. Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2001.
[16]
K. Kraemer and J. L. King, "Information Technology and Administrative Reform: Will the Time After E-Government Be Different?," presented at the Heinrich Reinemann Schrift Fest, Post Graduate School of Administration, Speyer, Germany, 2003.
[17]
O. Tansey, "Process Tracing and Elite Interviewing: A Case for Non-probability Sampling," PS: Political Science and Politics, vol. 40, pp. 765--772, 2007.
[18]
A. Bennett and C. Elman, "Qualitative Research: Recent Developments in Case Study Methods," Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 9, pp. 455--476, 2006.
[19]
Oversightandreform, "UNCOVERED: Federal Government Worker "American Idle"? - Long Version and GSA Awards Ceremony," ed. YouTube.com, 2012.
[20]
H. Simon, Administrative Behavior. New York: The Free Press, 1976.
[21]
I. Mergel, "Social media adoption and resulting tactics in the U.S. federal government," Government Information Quarterly, vol. 30, pp. 123--130, 2013.
[22]
F. D. Davis, "Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology," MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, pp. 319--340, 1989.
[23]
Y. Takhteyeva, A. Gruzdb, and Barry Wellman, "Geography of Twitter networks," Social Networks, vol. 34, pp. 73--81, 2012.
[24]
V. Venkatesh and F. D. Davis, "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Adoption Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, vol. 46, pp. 186--204, 2000.
[25]
M. Z. Sobaci and N. Karkin, "The use of twitter by mayors in Turkey: Tweets for better public services?," Government Information Quarterly, vol. 30, pp. 417--425, 2013.
[26]
D. Linders, "From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media," Government Information Quarterly, vol. 29, pp. 446--454, 2012.
[27]
I. Mergel and S. Bretschneider, "Theoretical Model of Adoption Process with Application to Social Media Practices in the Public Sector: Where the formal and informal organizations meet!," Public Administration Review, vol. 73, pp. 390--400, 2013.
[28]
D. M. West, Digital Government: Technology and Public Sector Performance. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005.
[29]
D. Norris and M. J. Moon, "Advancing E-Government at the Grassroots: Tortoise or Hare?," The Public Administration Review, vol. 65, pp. 64--75, 2005.
[30]
C. M. Judd, E. R. Smith, and L. H. Kidder, Research methods in social relations. Fort Worth (TX): Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1991
[31]
B. G. Glaser and A. L. Strauss, The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine Publishing, 1967.
[32]
A. L. Strauss and J. M. Corbin, Grounded Theory in Practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc., 1997.
[33]
J. Jasperson, T. A. Carte, C. S. Saunders, B. S. Butler, H. J. P. Croes, and W. J. Zheng, "Review: Power and information technology research: A metatriangulation review," Mis Quarterly, vol. 26, pp. 397--459, Dec 2002.
[34]
D. Collier, "Understanding Process Tracing," PS: Political Science and Politics, vol. 44, pp. 823--830, 2011.
[35]
J. C. Bertot, P. T. Jaeger, and D. Hansen, "The impact of policies on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations," Government Information Quarterly, vol. 2011.
[36]
United States Congress, "E-Government Act of 2002," in H.R. 2458 vol. Public Law No: 107-347, t. Congress, Ed., ed. Washington, DC, 2002.
[37]
GAO, "Challenges In Federal Agencies' Use of Web 2.0 Technologies," U. S. G. A. Office, Ed., ed. Washington, DC, 2011.
[38]
GAO, "Federal Law Should Be Updated to Address Changing Technology Landscape," United States Congress, Washington, D.C.2012.
[39]
I. Mergel, "Government 2.0 Revisited: Social Media Strategies in the Public Sector," PA Times, vol. 33, p. 7 & 10, 2010.
[40]
J. A. Schumpeter, The Theory of Economic Development: An enquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. New York: New York University Press, 1961.
[41]
Landmark Agreements Clear Path for Government New Media, U. S. G. S. Administration, 2010.
[42]
E. M. Rogers, "New Product Adoption and Diffusion," The Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 2, pp. 290--301, 1976.
[43]
E. M. Rogers, Diffusion of innovations, 4 ed. New York: Free Press, 1995.
[44]
E. M. Rogers, Adoption of Innovation. New York: The Free Press, 2005.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Evolutionary Trends in the Adoption, Adaptation, and Abandonment of Mobile Health Technologies: Viewpoint Based on 25 Years of ResearchJournal of Medical Internet Research10.2196/6279026(e62790)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2024
  • (2024)The effects of e-participation on voice and accountability: are there differences between countries?Information Technology for Development10.1080/02681102.2024.2373745(1-26)Online publication date: 22-Jul-2024
  • (2023)Comments Analysis on Social Media: A ReviewICST Transactions on Scalable Information Systems10.4108/eetsis.3843Online publication date: 6-Sep-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
dg.o '14: Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research
June 2014
365 pages
ISBN:9781450329019
DOI:10.1145/2612733
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

  • Digital Government Society of North America

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 18 June 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. U.S. federal government
  2. governance mechanisms
  3. institutionalization
  4. new technology adoption
  5. social media

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

dg.o '14
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

dg.o '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 36 of 62 submissions, 58%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 150 of 271 submissions, 55%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)28
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 30 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Evolutionary Trends in the Adoption, Adaptation, and Abandonment of Mobile Health Technologies: Viewpoint Based on 25 Years of ResearchJournal of Medical Internet Research10.2196/6279026(e62790)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2024
  • (2024)The effects of e-participation on voice and accountability: are there differences between countries?Information Technology for Development10.1080/02681102.2024.2373745(1-26)Online publication date: 22-Jul-2024
  • (2023)Comments Analysis on Social Media: A ReviewICST Transactions on Scalable Information Systems10.4108/eetsis.3843Online publication date: 6-Sep-2023
  • (2023)What explains the degree of e-participation? A comparison of the adoption of digital participation platforms in Oslo, Melbourne and MadridInformation Polity10.3233/IP-22003528:3(359-375)Online publication date: 5-Sep-2023
  • (2022)PEMANFAATAN MEDIA SOSIAL DALAM KEHUMASAN DIGITAL KEMENTERIAN LUAR NEGERIInteraksi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi10.14710/interaksi.11.1.35-4811:1(35-48)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2022
  • (2022)Does population size matter? Political participation of citizens through mobile instant messaging services depending on the place of residenceCatalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies10.1386/cjcs_00071_114:2(249-265)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2022
  • (2022)Cybersecurity Threats in Local Government: A Sociotechnical PerspectiveThe American Review of Public Administration10.1177/0275074022112543252:8(558-572)Online publication date: 11-Oct-2022
  • (2021)Social media for government information dissemination: content, characteristics and civic engagementAslib Journal of Information Management10.1108/AJIM-07-2020-0201ahead-of-print:ahead-of-printOnline publication date: 28-May-2021
  • (2020)Municipalities e-Participation initiatives through FacebookProceedings of the 13th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance10.1145/3428502.3428585(551-559)Online publication date: 23-Sep-2020
  • (2020)Social media in government offices: usage and strategiesAslib Journal of Information Management10.1108/AJIM-11-2019-0313ahead-of-print:ahead-of-printOnline publication date: 28-Apr-2020
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media