Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2611040.2611081acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswimsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

EmoTube: A Sentiment Analysis Integrated Environment for Social Web Content

Published: 02 June 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Mashup technologies offer numerous capabilities for innovative applications and services development and integration. Content accessing via mashups' interoperable and dynamic interfaces facilitates new enterprise models, while technological tools and smart techniques contribute to the development of integrated platforms. This work presents the principles and characteristics of the so-called "EmoTube" mashup, which is an integrated Web environment suitable for capturing and summarizing users' opinions expressed in their comments on YouTube videos. The main goal of this implementation is the visualization of users' opinions on a geo-located map for a better positioning of peoples' attitudes about various issues. Such summarization can be beneficial for several services such as recommendations and policy and decision making.

References

[1]
S. Baden, D. Lefebvre, J. Dar, M. Langner, M. T. Yu, "Web application hybrid".
[2]
F. Benamara, C. Cesarano and D. Reforgiato, "Sentiment Analysis: Adjectives and Adverbs are better than Adjectives Alone", ICWSM-07 Boulder, CO USA, 2007.
[3]
C. Cappiello M. Matera, M. Picozzi, G. Sprega, D. Barbagallo, C. Francalanci, "DashMash: A Mashup Environment for End User Development", 11th International Conference, ICWE 2011, Paphos, Cyprus, June 20-24, 2011.
[4]
C. Cappiello, F. Daniel, M. Matera, C. Pautasso, "Information Quality in Mashups", Internet Computing, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp. 14--22, July-Aug 2010.
[5]
D. Chatzakou, V. Koutsonikola, A. Vakali and K. Kafetsios, "Micro-Blogging Content Analysis via Emotionally-Driven Clustering", ACII, Geneva, 2013.
[6]
L. Clarkin and J. Holmes, "Enterprise Mashups", MSDN Architecture Center, Journal 13.
[7]
Y. Dang, Y. Zhang and H. Chen, "A Lexicon-Enhanced Method for Sentiment Classification: An Experiment on Online Product Reviews", IEEE Computer Science, IEEE Intelligent Systems, Vol. 25. 4, pp 46--53, July.-Aug. 2010).
[8]
A. Esuli and F. Sebastiani, "SentiWordNet: A Publicly Available Lexical Recource for Opinion Mining", In Proceedings of 5th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC-06. Genova, Italy, pp 417--422, 2006.
[9]
J. J. Hanson, "Mashups: Strategies for the Modern Enterprise", Mashups Styles, Techniques and Technologies, Chapter 1, pp 28--25, May 2009.
[10]
V. Hatzivassiloglou and J. Wiebe, "Effects of Adjective Orientation and Gradability on Sentence Subjectivity", In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-00), 2000.
[11]
B. Liu, "Sentiment Analysis and Subjectivity", Handbook of Natural Language Processing, Second Edition, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca, Chicago, USA, 2010.
[12]
B. Liu, "Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining", Chicago, USA, May 2012.
[13]
Y. Mejova, "Sentiment Analysis: An Overview", Nov. 2009.
[14]
B. Pang and L. Lee, "A Sentimental Education: Sentiment Analysis using Subjectivity Summarization based on Minimum Cuts", In Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pp. 271--278, 2004.
[15]
B. Pang and L. Lee, "Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis", Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, Vol. 2, pp. 1--135, 2008.
[16]
K. Scherer, "Trends and Developments: Research on Emotions", Social Science Information, Sage Publications, Vol. 44. 4, pp. 695--729, 2005.
[17]
C. Strapparava and R. Mihalcea, "Learning to Identify Emotions in Text", SAC '08 Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on Applied computing, pp. 1556--1560, 2008.
[18]
M. Taboada, J. Brooke, M. Tofiloski, K. Voll and M. Stede, "Lexicon-based methods for Sentiment Analysis", Computational Linguistics, Volume 37 Canada, pp. 268--307, Sept. 2010.
[19]
K. Tsagkalidou, V. Koutsonikola, A. Vakali and K. Kafetsios, "Emotional Aware Clustering on Micro-blogging Sources", ACII'11 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Affective computing and intelligent interaction, pp. 387--396.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Over a decade of social opinion mining: a systematic reviewArtificial Intelligence Review10.1007/s10462-021-10030-2Online publication date: 25-Jun-2021
  • (2017)Arabic sentiment analysis of YouTube comments2017 IEEE Jordan Conference on Applied Electrical Engineering and Computing Technologies (AEECT)10.1109/AEECT.2017.8257766(1-6)Online publication date: Oct-2017
  • (2017)Ensuring business and service requirements in enterprise mashupsInformation Systems and e-Business Management10.1007/s10257-017-0363-x16:1(205-242)Online publication date: 6-Sep-2017
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
WIMS '14: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics (WIMS14)
June 2014
506 pages
ISBN:9781450325387
DOI:10.1145/2611040
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

  • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 June 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Web 2.0
  2. mashups
  3. sentiment analysis
  4. social networks
  5. user-generated content

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

WIMS '14

Acceptance Rates

WIMS '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 41 of 90 submissions, 46%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 140 of 278 submissions, 50%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 18 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Over a decade of social opinion mining: a systematic reviewArtificial Intelligence Review10.1007/s10462-021-10030-2Online publication date: 25-Jun-2021
  • (2017)Arabic sentiment analysis of YouTube comments2017 IEEE Jordan Conference on Applied Electrical Engineering and Computing Technologies (AEECT)10.1109/AEECT.2017.8257766(1-6)Online publication date: Oct-2017
  • (2017)Ensuring business and service requirements in enterprise mashupsInformation Systems and e-Business Management10.1007/s10257-017-0363-x16:1(205-242)Online publication date: 6-Sep-2017
  • (2017)Opinion Mining for Educational Video LecturesGeNeDis 201610.1007/978-3-319-57348-9_20(235-243)Online publication date: 3-Oct-2017
  • (2016)Sentiment Analysis using Word-GraphsProceedings of the 6th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics10.1145/2912845.2912863(1-9)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2016
  • (2015)Sentiment Analysis over Social Networks: An Overview2015 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics10.1109/SMC.2015.380(2174-2179)Online publication date: Oct-2015

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media