Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2607023.2610272acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseicsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Design space for focus+context navigation in web forms

Published: 17 June 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Navigation in long forms commonly employs user interface design patterns such as scrolling, tabs, and wizard steps. Since these patterns hide contextual form fields outside the viewport or behind other tabs or pages, we propose to apply the focus+context principle from information visualization to form design. This work presents a design space analysis to support usability engineering of focus+context form navigation. We evaluated the design space's usefulness and applicability in a case study and found the design space has fostered creativity and helped to clearly document design decisions, indicating it can be a valuable support for engineering intelligent, form-based user interfaces.

References

[1]
Alexander, J., and Cockburn, A. An empirical characterisation of electronic document navigation. In Proc. Graphics Interface '08, Canadian Information Processing Society (2008), 123--130.
[2]
Anderson, C. R., Domingos, P., and Weld, D. S. Relational markov models and their application to adaptive web navigation. In Proc. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining '02, ACM (2002), 143--152.
[3]
Bargas-Avila, J., Brenzikofer, O., Roth, S., Tuch, A., Orsini, S., and Opwis, K. Simple but crucial user interfaces in the world wide web: Introducing 20 guidelines for usable web form design. In User Interfaces, InTech, 2010, ch. 1.
[4]
Björk, S., and Redström, J. Redefining the focus and context of focus+context visualizations. In Proc. Information Vizualization '00, IEEE (2000), 85--89.
[5]
Blumendorf, M., Lehmann, G., and Albayrak, S. Bridging models and systems at runtime to build adaptive user interfaces. In Proc. EICS '10, ACM (2010), 9--18.
[6]
Brooke, J. SUS -- a quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry 189 (1996), 194.
[7]
Card, S., Mackinlay, J., and Shneiderman, B. Using Vision to Think. Morgan Kaufmann, 1999.
[8]
Card, S. K., and Nation, D. Degree-of-interest trees: a component of an attention-reactive user interface. In Proc. Advanced Visual Interfaces '02, ACM (2002), 231--245.
[9]
Chang, B.-W., Mackinlay, J. D., Zellweger, P. T., and Igarashi, T. A negotiation architecture for fluid documents. In Proc. UIST '98, ACM (1998), 123--132.
[10]
Chen, C., and Rada, R. Interacting with hypertext: a meta-analysis of experimental studies. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 11, 2 (June 1996), 125--156.
[11]
Cockburn, A., Karlson, A., and Bederson, B. B. A review of overview+detail, zooming, and focus+context interfaces. ACM Comput. Surv. 41, 1 (Jan. 2009), 2:1--2:31.
[12]
Cockburn, A., Quinn, P., Gutwin, C., and Fitchett, S. Improving scrolling devices with document length dependent gain. In Proc. CHI '12, ACM (2012), 267--276.
[13]
Couper, M. P., Baker, R., and Mechling, J. Placement and design of navigation buttons in web surveys. Survey Practice 4, 1 (2013).
[14]
Dillon, A., McKnight, C., and Richardson, J. Navigation in hypertext: A critical review of the concept. In Proc. INTERACT '90, North-Holland (1990), 587--592.
[15]
Dork, M., Lam, H., and Benjelloun, O. Accentuating visualization parameters to guide exploration. In CHI'13 Extended Abstracts, ACM (2013), 1755--1760.
[16]
Dørum, K., and Garland, K. Efficient electronic navigation: A metaphorical question? Interacting with Computers 23, 2 (2011), 129--136.
[17]
Findlater, L., Moffatt, K., McGrenere, J., and Dawson, J. Ephemeral adaptation: The use of gradual onset to improve menu selection performance. In Proc. CHI '09, ACM (2009), 1655--1664.
[18]
Furnas, G. A fisheye follow-up: further reflections on focus + context. In Proc. CHI '06, ACM (2006), 999--1008.
[19]
Furnas, G. W. Effective view navigation. In Proc. CHI '97, ACM (1997), 367--374.
[20]
Guiard, Y., Du, Y., and Chapuis, O. Quantifying degree of goal directedness in document navigation: application to the evaluation of the perspective-drag technique. In Proc. CHI '07, ACM (2007), 327--336.
[21]
Harms, J. Research goals for evolving the "form" user interface metaphor towards more interactivity. In Human Factors in Computing and Informatics, vol. 7946 of LNCS. Springer, 2013, 819--822.
[22]
Hook, K., and Svensson, M. Evaluating adaptive navigation support. In Social Navigation of Information Space, Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Springer, 1999, 237--249.
[23]
Jarrett, C., and Gaffney, G. Forms that work: designing web forms for usability. Morgan Kaufmann, 2008.
[24]
MacLean, A., Young, R. M., and Moran, T. P. Design rationale: the argument behind the artifact. SIGCHI Bull. 20, SI (Mar. 1989), 247--252.
[25]
Malinowski, U. Adjusting the presentation of forms to users' behavior. In Proc. IUI '93, ACM (1993), 247--249.
[26]
Malinowski, U., Kühme, T., Dieterich, H., and Schneider-Hufschmidt, M. A taxonomy of adaptive user interfaces. In Proc. HCI '92, Cambridge University Press (1993), 391--414.
[27]
Mayhew, D. J. The Usability engineering lifecycle: A practitioner's handbook for user interface design. Morgan Kaufmann, 1999.
[28]
Mizoguchi, K., Sakamoto, D., and Igarashi, T. Overview scrollbar: A scrollbar showing an entire document as an overview. In Human-Computer Interaction -- INTERACT 2013, vol. 8120 of LNCS. Springer, 2013, 603--610.
[29]
Nielsen, J. The matters that really matter for hypertext usability. In Proc. HYPERTEXT '89, ACM (1989), 239--248.
[30]
Pilgrim, C. J. Website navigation tools -- a decade of design trends 2002 to 2011. In Australasian User Interface Conference (AUIC 2012), vol. 126 of CRPIT, ACS (2012), 3--10.
[31]
Rummel, B. System usability scale (translated into german). www.sapdesignguild.org/resources/sus.asp, last retrieved March 12th, 2014.
[32]
Spence, R. A framework for navigation. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 51, 5 (1999), 919--945.
[33]
Tomasic, A., Cohen, W., Fussell, S., Zimmerman, J., Kobayashi, M., Minkov, E., Halstead, N., Mosur, R., and Hum, J. Learning to Navigate Web Forms. In Workshop on Information Integration on the Web (2004).
[34]
Vainio, T. A review of the navigation HCI research during the 2000's. Int. J. Interactive Mobile Technologies 4, 3 (2010), 36--42.
[35]
Woods, D. D. The price of flexibility. In Proc. IUI '93, ACM (1993), 19--25.
[36]
Wroblewski, L. Web Form Design. Filling the Blanks. Louis Rosenfeld, 2008.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)BAGEL: An Approach to Automatically Detect Navigation-Based Web Accessibility Barriers for Keyboard UsersProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580749(1-17)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2023)A Comparison of Form Navigation with Tabbing and PointingUniversal Access in Human-Computer Interaction10.1007/978-3-031-35681-0_20(311-318)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2023

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
EICS '14: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGCHI symposium on Engineering interactive computing systems
June 2014
312 pages
ISBN:9781450327251
DOI:10.1145/2607023
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 17 June 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. HCI
  2. focus + context
  3. navigation
  4. web form design

Qualifiers

  • Short-paper

Conference

EICS'14
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

EICS '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 16 of 88 submissions, 18%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 73 of 299 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 20 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)BAGEL: An Approach to Automatically Detect Navigation-Based Web Accessibility Barriers for Keyboard UsersProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580749(1-17)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2023)A Comparison of Form Navigation with Tabbing and PointingUniversal Access in Human-Computer Interaction10.1007/978-3-031-35681-0_20(311-318)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2023

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media