Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2688073.2688088acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesitcsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Fractal Structures in Adversarial Prediction

Published: 11 January 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Fractals are self-similar recursive structures that have been used in modeling several real world processes. In this work we study how "fractal-like" processes arise in a prediction game where an adversary is generating a sequence of bits and an algorithm is trying to predict them. We will see that under a certain formalization of the predictive payoff for the algorithm it is most optimal for the adversary to produce a fractal-like sequence to minimize the algorithm's ability to predict. Indeed it has been suggested before that financial markets exhibit a fractal-like behavior [FP98, Man05]. We prove that a fractal-like distribution arises naturally out of an optimization from the adversary's perspective.
In addition, we give optimal trade-offs between predictability and expected deviation (i.e. sum of bits) for our formalization of predictive payoff. This result is motivated by the observation that several time series data exhibit higher deviations than expected for a completely random walk.

References

[1]
J. Abernethy, R.M. Frongillo, and A. Wibisono. Minimax option pricing meets black-scholes in the limit. In Proceedings of the 44th symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 1029--1040. ACM, 2012.
[2]
E. Bayraktar, H.V. Poor, and K.R. Sircar. Estimating the fractal dimension of the s&p 500 index using wavelet analysis. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 7(05):615--643, 2004.
[3]
F. Black and M. Scholes. The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. The journal of political economy, pages 637--654, 1973.
[4]
B.O. Bradley and M.S. Taqqu. Financial risk and heavy tails. Handbook of Heavy-Tailed Distributions in Finance, pages 35--103, 2003.
[5]
T. Cover. Behaviour of sequential predictors of binary sequences. Transactions of the Fourth Prague Conference on Information Theory, Statistical Decision Functions, Random Processes, 1965.
[6]
P. DeMarzo, I. Kremer, and Y. Mansour. Online trading algorithms and robust option pricing. 2006.
[7]
P. Davy, A. Sornette, and D. Sornette. Some consequences of a proposed fractal nature of continental faulting. Nature, 348(6296):56--58, 1990.
[8]
Kenneth Falconer. Front matter. Fractal Geometry: Mathematical Foundations and Applications, Second Edition, pages i--xxvii.
[9]
A.J. Frost and R.R. Prechter. Elliott wave principle: key to market behavior. Bookworld Services, 1998.
[10]
G. Gripenberg and I. Norros. On the prediction of fractional brownian motion. Journal of Applied Probability, pages 400--410, 1996.
[11]
N. Littlestone and M.K. Warmuth. The weighted majority algorithm. FOCS, 1989.
[12]
B. Mandelbrot. Fractals and Chaos: the Mandelbrot set and beyond, volume 3. Springer, 2004.
[13]
B.B. Mandelbrot. The inescapable need for fractal tools in finance. Annals of Finance, 1(2):193--195, 2005.
[14]
B.B. Mandelbrot, D.E. Passoja, and A.J. Paullay. Fractal character of fracture surfaces of metals. 1984.
[15]
B.B. Mandelbrot and J.W. Van Ness. Fractional brownian motions, fractional noises and applications. SIAM review, 10(4):422--437, 1968.
[16]
J. Nolan. Stable distributions: models for heavy-tailed data. Birkhauser, 2003.
[17]
I. Norros. On the use of fractional brownian motion in the theory of connectionless networks. Selected Areas in Communications, IEEE Journal on, 13(6):953--962, 1995.
[18]
D. Nualart Rodón. Fractional brownian motion: stochastic calculus and applications. In Proceedings oh the International Congress of Mathematicians: Madrid, August 22--30, 2006: invited lectures, pages 1541--1562, 2006.
[19]
Rina Panigrahy and Preyas Popat. Fractal structures in adversarial prediction. CoRR, abs/1304.7576, 2013.
[20]
S.T. Rachev, C. Menn, F.J. Fabozzi, et al. Fat-tailed and skewed asset return distributions: Implications for risk management, portfolio selection, and option pricing, volume 139. Wiley, 2005.
[21]
L.C.G. Rogers. Arbitrage with fractional brownian motion. Mathematical Finance, 7(1):95--105, 2002.
[22]
G. Shafer and V. Vovk. Probability and finance: it's only a game!, volume 373. Wiley-Interscience.
[23]
T. Sottinen and E. Valkeila. On arbitrage and replication in the fractional black-scholes pricing model. Statistics & Decisions/International mathematical Journal for stochastic methods and models, 21(2/2003):93--108, 2003.
[24]
J. Voit. The statistical mechanics of financial markets. Springer, 2005.

Index Terms

  1. Fractal Structures in Adversarial Prediction

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ITCS '15: Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science
    January 2015
    404 pages
    ISBN:9781450333337
    DOI:10.1145/2688073
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 11 January 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. adversarial prediction
    2. fractal brownian motion

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    ITCS'15
    Sponsor:
    ITCS'15: Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science
    January 11 - 13, 2015
    Rehovot, Israel

    Acceptance Rates

    ITCS '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 45 of 159 submissions, 28%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 172 of 513 submissions, 34%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 88
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 27 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media