Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2684822.2685316acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswsdmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Sarcasm Detection on Twitter: A Behavioral Modeling Approach

Published: 02 February 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Sarcasm is a nuanced form of language in which individuals state the opposite of what is implied. With this intentional ambiguity, sarcasm detection has always been a challenging task, even for humans. Current approaches to automatic sarcasm detection rely primarily on lexical and linguistic cues. This paper aims to address the difficult task of sarcasm detection on Twitter by leveraging behavioral traits intrinsic to users expressing sarcasm. We identify such traits using the user's past tweets. We employ theories from behavioral and psychological studies to construct a behavioral modeling framework tuned for detecting sarcasm. We evaluate our framework and demonstrate its efficiency in identifying sarcastic tweets.

References

[1]
M. Basavanna. Dictionary of psychology. Allied Publishers, 2000.
[2]
F. Bi and J. A. Konstan. Customer service 2.0: Where social computing meets customer relations. IEEE Computer, 45(11):93--95, 2012.
[3]
H. S. Cheang and M. D. Pell. Recognizing sarcasm without language: A cross-linguistic study of english and cantonese. Pragmatics & Cognition, 19(2), 2011.
[4]
D. Davidov, O. Tsur, and A. Rappoport. Semi-supervised recognition of sarcastic sentences in twitter and amazon. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, pages 107--116. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2010.
[5]
M. L. Dress, R. J. Kreuz, K. E. Link, and G. M. Caucci. Regional variation in the use of sarcasm. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27(1):71--85, 2008.
[6]
R.-E. Fan, K.-W. Chang, C.-J. Hsieh, X.-R. Wang, and C.-J. Lin. Liblinear: A library for large linear classification. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9:1871--1874, 2008.
[7]
T. Fawcett. An introduction toROC\ analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8):861 -- 874, 2006.ROC\ Analysis in Pattern Recognition.
[8]
R. Flesch. A new readability yardstick. Journal of applied psychology, 32(3):221, 1948.
[9]
R. W. Gibbs. Irony in talk among friends. Metaphor and symbol, 15(1--2):5--27, 2000.
[10]
R. González-Ibánez, S. Muresan, and N. Wacholder. Identifying sarcasm in twitter: A closer look. In ACL (Short Papers), pages 581--586. Citeseer, 2011.
[11]
H. P. Grice. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J. L. Morgan, editors, Syntax and semantics, volume 3. New York: Academic Press, 1975.
[12]
H. P. Grice. Some further notes on logic and conversation. In P. Cole, editor, Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics, pages 113--127. 1978.
[13]
M. Hall, E. Frank, G. Holmes, B. Pfahringer, P. Reutemann, and I. H. Witten. The Weka data mining software: an update. ACM SIGKDD explorations newsletter, 11(1):10--18, 2009.
[14]
Y. Hu, K. Talamadupula, S. Kambhampati, et al. Dude, srsly?: The surprisingly formal nature of twitter's language. In ICWSM, 2013.
[15]
J. P. Kincaid, R. P. Fishburne Jr, R. L. Rogers, and B. S. Chissom. Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, fog count and flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel. Technical report, DTIC Document, 1975.
[16]
E. Kouloumpis, T. Wilson, and J. Moore. Twitter sentiment analysis: The good the bad and the omg! ICWSM, 11:538--541, 2011.
[17]
R. J. Kreuz and G. M. Caucci. Lexical influences on the perception of sarcasm. In Proceedings of the Workshop on computational approaches to Figurative Language, pages 1--4. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2007.
[18]
R. J. Kreuz and S. Glucksberg. How to be sarcastic: The echoic reminder theory of verbal irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(4):374, 1989.
[19]
S. Kumon-Nakamura, S. Glucksberg, and M. Brown. How about another piece of pie: The allusional pretense theory of discourse irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124(1):3, 1995.
[20]
C. Liebrecht, F. Kunneman, and A. van den Bosch. The perfect solution for detecting sarcasm in tweets\# not. WASSA 2013, page 29, 2013.
[21]
W. Liu and D. Ruths. What's in a name? using first names as features for gender inference in twitter. In Analyzing Microtext: 2013 AAAI Spring Symposium, 2013.
[22]
G. H. McLaughlin. Smog grading: A new readability formula. Journal of reading, 12(8):639--646, 1969.
[23]
J. Oller, John W. Scoring methods and difficulty levels for cloze tests of proficiency in english as a second language. The Modern Language Journal, 56(3):pp. 151--158, 1972.
[24]
O. Owoputi, B. O'Connor, C. Dyer, K. Gimpel, N. Schneider, and N. A. Smith. Improved part-of-speech tagging for online conversational text with word clusters. In Proceedings of NAACL-HLT, pages 380--390, 2013.
[25]
B. Pang and L. Lee. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and trends in information retrieval, 2(1--2):1--135, 2008.
[26]
F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, et al. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12:2825--2830, 2011.
[27]
J. W. Pennebaker, M. E. Francis, and R. J. Booth. Linguistic inquiry and word count: Liwc 2001. Mahway: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, page 71, 2001.
[28]
A. Reyes, P. Rosso, and D. Buscaldi. From humor recognition to irony detection: The figurative language of social media. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 74:1--12, 2012.
[29]
E. Riloff, A. Qadir, P. Surve, and Silva. Sarcasm as contrast between a positive sentiment and negative situation. In EMNLP, pages 704--714. ACL, 2013.
[30]
P. Rockwell. Lower, slower, louder: Vocal cues of sarcasm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(5):483--495, 2000.
[31]
P. Rockwell. Empathy and the expression and recognition of sarcasm by close relations or strangers. Perceptual and motor skills, 97(1):251--256, 2003.
[32]
P. Rockwell. The effects of cognitive complexity and communication apprehension on the expression and recognition of sarcasm. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, 2007.
[33]
P. Rockwell and E. M. Theriot. Culture, gender, and gender mix in encoders of sarcasm: A self-assessment analysis. Communication Research Reports, 18(1):44 -- 52, 2001.
[34]
C. Strapparava and A. Valitutti. Wordnet affect: an affective extension of wordnet. In LREC, volume 4, pages 1083--1086, 2004.
[35]
J. Tepperman, D. R. Traum, and S. Narayanan. " yeah right": sarcasm recognition for spoken dialogue systems. In INTERSPEECH, 2006.
[36]
M. Thelwall, K. Buckley, G. Paltoglou, D. Cai, and A. Kappas. Sentiment strength detection in short informal text. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12):2544--2558, 2010.
[37]
M. Toplak and A. N. Katz. On the uses of sarcastic irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10):1467--1488, 2000.
[38]
O. Tsur, D. Davidov, and A. Rappoport. Icwsm-a great catchy name: Semi-supervised recognition of sarcastic sentences in online product reviews. In ICWSM, 2010.
[39]
A. Utsumi. Verbal irony as implicit display of ironic environment: Distinguishing ironic utterances from nonirony. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(12):1777--1806.
[40]
W. Wang, L. Chen, K. Thirunarayan, and A. P. Sheth. Cursing in english on twitter. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing, pages 415--425. ACM, 2014.
[41]
A. B. Warriner, V. Kuperman, and M. Brysbaert. Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 english lemmas. Behavior research methods, pages 1--17, 2013.
[42]
R. Zafarani and H. Liu. Connecting users across social media sites: a behavioral-modeling approach. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 41--49. ACM, 2013.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Modeling inter-modal incongruous sentiment expressions for multi-modal sarcasm detectionNeurocomputing10.1016/j.neucom.2024.128874616(128874)Online publication date: Feb-2025
  • (2024)A novel transformer attention‐based approach for sarcasm detectionExpert Systems10.1111/exsy.13686Online publication date: 23-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Sarcasm‐based tweet‐level stress detectionExpert Systems10.1111/exsy.1353441:4Online publication date: 10-Jan-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Sarcasm Detection on Twitter: A Behavioral Modeling Approach

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    WSDM '15: Proceedings of the Eighth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining
    February 2015
    482 pages
    ISBN:9781450333177
    DOI:10.1145/2684822
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 02 February 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. behavioral modeling
    2. sarcasm detection
    3. social media

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    WSDM 2015

    Acceptance Rates

    WSDM '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 39 of 238 submissions, 16%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 498 of 2,863 submissions, 17%

    Upcoming Conference

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)162
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)20
    Reflects downloads up to 20 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2025)Modeling inter-modal incongruous sentiment expressions for multi-modal sarcasm detectionNeurocomputing10.1016/j.neucom.2024.128874616(128874)Online publication date: Feb-2025
    • (2024)A novel transformer attention‐based approach for sarcasm detectionExpert Systems10.1111/exsy.13686Online publication date: 23-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Sarcasm‐based tweet‐level stress detectionExpert Systems10.1111/exsy.1353441:4Online publication date: 10-Jan-2024
    • (2024)An Emoticon-Based Novel Sarcasm Pattern Detection Strategy to Identify Sarcasm in Microblogging Social NetworksIEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems10.1109/TCSS.2023.330690811:4(5319-5326)Online publication date: Aug-2024
    • (2024)A Quantum Probability Driven Framework for Joint Multi-Modal Sarcasm, Sentiment and Emotion AnalysisIEEE Transactions on Affective Computing10.1109/TAFFC.2023.327914515:1(326-341)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
    • (2024)Integration of NLP and Deep Learning for Automated Fake News Detection2024 Second International Conference on Inventive Computing and Informatics (ICICI)10.1109/ICICI62254.2024.00072(398-404)Online publication date: 11-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Effectiveness and Influence of Parts of Speech like adjectives and interjections for examining the feelings in sentences containing sarcasm: A study2024 Second International Conference on Advances in Information Technology (ICAIT)10.1109/ICAIT61638.2024.10690577(1-10)Online publication date: 24-Jul-2024
    • (2024)A Novel Machine Learning Model for Sarcasm Detection on Facebook Comments2024 3rd International Conference on Applied Artificial Intelligence and Computing (ICAAIC)10.1109/ICAAIC60222.2024.10575012(546-552)Online publication date: 5-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Detect Sarcasm and Humor Jointly by Neural Multi-Task LearningIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.337085812(38071-38080)Online publication date: 2024
    • (2024)Towards Understanding the Role of Content-based and Contextualized Features in Detecting Abuse on TwitterHeliyon10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29593(e29593)Online publication date: Apr-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media