Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2684822.2685293acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswsdmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

The Power of Random Neighbors in Social Networks

Published: 02 February 2015 Publication History

Abstract

The friendship paradox is a sociological phenomenon first discovered by Feld which states that individuals are likely to have fewer friends than their friends do, on average. This phenomenon has become common knowledge, has several interesting applications, and has also been observed in various data sets. In his seminal paper Feld provides an intuitive explanation by showing that in any graph the average degree of edges in the graph is an upper bound on the average degree of nodes. Despite the appeal of this argument, it does not prove the existence of the friendship paradox. In fact, it is easy to construct networks -- even with power law degree distributions -- where the ratio between the average degree of neighbors and the average degree of nodes is high, but all nodes have the exact same degree as their neighbors. Which models, then, explain the friendship paradox? In this paper we give a strong characterization that provides a formal understanding of the friendship paradox. We show that for any power law graph with exponential parameter in (1,3), when every edge is rewired with constant probability, the friendship paradox holds, i.e. there is an asymptotic gap between the average degree of the sample of polylogarithmic size and the average degree of a random set of its neighbors of equal size. To examine this characterization on real data, we performed several experiments on social network data sets that complement our theoretical analysis. We also discuss the applications of our result to influence maximization.

References

[1]
W. Aiello, F. Chung, and L. Lu. A random graph model for power law graphs. In STOC, 2000.
[2]
L. Backstrom and J. M. Kleinberg. Network bucket testing. In WWW, 2011.
[3]
A.-L. Barabási and R. Albert. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 1999.
[4]
B. Bollobás. A probabilistic proof of an asymptotic formula for the number of labelled regular graphs. European J. Combin., 1980.
[5]
N. A. Christakis and J. H. Fowler. Social Network Sensors for Early Detection of Contagious Outbreaks. In PLoS ONE, 2010.
[6]
R. Cohen, S. Havlin, and D. Ben-Avraham. Efficient immunization strategies for computer networks and populations. Physical Review Letters, 2003.
[7]
A. Dasgupta, R. Kumar, and D. Sivakumar. Network bucket testing. In KDD, 2012.
[8]
P. Domingos and M. Richardson. Mining the network value of customers. In KDD, pages 57--66, 2001.
[9]
E. Even-Dar and A. Shapira. A note on maximizing the spread of influence in social networks. Inf. Process. Lett., 111(4):184--187, 2011.
[10]
S. Feld. Why your friends have more friends than you do. American Journal of Sociology, 1991.
[11]
S. L. Feld and B. Grofman. Variation in class size, the class size paradox, and some consequences for students. Research in Higher Education, 6, 1977.
[12]
M. Granovetter. The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 1983.
[13]
N. O. Hodas, F. Kooti, and K. Lerman. Friendship paradox redux: Your friends are more interesting than you. CoRR, abs/1304.3480, 2013.
[14]
L. Katzir, E. Liberty, and O. Somekh. Estimating sizes of social networks via biased sampling. . In WWW, 2011.
[15]
L. Katzir, E. Liberty, and O. Somekh. Framework and algorithms for network bucket testing. . In WWW, 2012.
[16]
D. Kempe, J. Kleinberg, and E. Tardos. Maximizing the spread of in uence through a social network. In KDD.
[17]
J. Kleinberg. Navigation in a small world. Nature, 406:257--275, 2000.
[18]
B. Klimt and Y. Yang. In First Conference on Email and Anti-Spam (CEAS), Mountain View, CA.
[19]
M. Lelarge. Efficient Control of Epidemics over Random Networks. In SIGMETRICS, 2009.
[20]
J. Leskovec and C. Faloutsos. Sampling from large graphs. In KDD, 2006.
[21]
J. Leskovec, D. Huttenlocher, and J. Kleinberg. Predicting Positive and Negative Links in Online Social Networks. In WWW, 2010.
[22]
J. Leskovec, K. Lang, A. Dasgupta, and M. Mahoney. Community structure in large networks: Natural cluster sizes and the absence of large well-defined clusters. Internet Mathematics, 6, 2009.
[23]
C. McDiarmid. On the method of bounded differences. Surveys in Combinatorics, 1989.
[24]
M. Mitzenmacher. A brief history of generative models for power law and lognormal distributions. Internet mathematics 1 (2), 2004.
[25]
M. Newman. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM review, 45(2):167--256, 2003.
[26]
M. Richardson and P. Domingos. Mining knowledge-sharing sites for viral marketing. In KDD, pages 61--70, 2002.
[27]
F. Santos and J. P. T. Lenaerts. Evolutionary dynamics of social dilemmas in structured heterogeneous populations. PNAS, 2006.
[28]
L. Seeman and Y. Singer. Adaptive seeding in social networks. In FOCS, 2013.
[29]
Y. Singer. How to win friends and influence people, truthfully: influence maximization mechanisms for social networks. In WSDM, pages 733--742, 2012.
[30]
J. Ugander, B. Karrer, L. Backstrom, and C. Marlow. The anatomy of the facebook social graph. CoRR, abs/1111.4503, 2011.
[31]
D. Watts and S. Strogatz. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature, 393, 409--410.
[32]
J. Yang and J. Leskovec. Defining and Evaluating Network Communities based on Ground-truth. In ICDM, 2012.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Exploring Reciprocal Exchanges and Trust-Based Authorizations: A Feasibility Demonstration with Location-Based ServicesTransactions on Large-Scale Data- and Knowledge-Centered Systems LVII10.1007/978-3-662-70140-9_2(27-67)Online publication date: 25-Oct-2024
  • (2022)Influence maximization under limited network information: seeding high-degree neighborsJournal of Physics: Complexity10.1088/2632-072X/ac94443:4(045004)Online publication date: 28-Oct-2022
  • (2021)Evaluating Stochastic Seeding Strategies in NetworksManagement Science10.1287/mnsc.2021.3963Online publication date: 17-May-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. The Power of Random Neighbors in Social Networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    WSDM '15: Proceedings of the Eighth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining
    February 2015
    482 pages
    ISBN:9781450333177
    DOI:10.1145/2684822
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 02 February 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. friendship paradox
    2. influence maximization
    3. social networks

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    WSDM 2015

    Acceptance Rates

    WSDM '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 39 of 238 submissions, 16%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 498 of 2,863 submissions, 17%

    Upcoming Conference

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)76
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)13
    Reflects downloads up to 16 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Exploring Reciprocal Exchanges and Trust-Based Authorizations: A Feasibility Demonstration with Location-Based ServicesTransactions on Large-Scale Data- and Knowledge-Centered Systems LVII10.1007/978-3-662-70140-9_2(27-67)Online publication date: 25-Oct-2024
    • (2022)Influence maximization under limited network information: seeding high-degree neighborsJournal of Physics: Complexity10.1088/2632-072X/ac94443:4(045004)Online publication date: 28-Oct-2022
    • (2021)Evaluating Stochastic Seeding Strategies in NetworksManagement Science10.1287/mnsc.2021.3963Online publication date: 17-May-2021
    • (2021)Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Power-law Degree Distributions via Friendship Paradox-based SamplingACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data10.1145/345116615:6(1-28)Online publication date: 19-May-2021
    • (2020)Preserving Secrecy in Mobile Social NetworksACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems10.1145/33960715:1(1-29)Online publication date: 30-Dec-2020
    • (2020)Diffusion in Social Networks: Effects of Monophilic Contagion, Friendship Paradox, and Reactive NetworksIEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering10.1109/TNSE.2019.29090157:3(1121-1132)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2020
    • (2020)Neighborhood Matters: Influence Maximization in Social Networks with Limited AccessIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2020.3015387(1-1)Online publication date: 2020
    • (2019)Influence Maximization Over Markovian Graphs: A Stochastic Optimization ApproachIEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks10.1109/TSIPN.2018.28320115:1(1-14)Online publication date: Mar-2019
    • (2019)"What Do Your Friends Think?": Efficient Polling Methods for Networks Using Friendship ParadoxIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2019.2940914(1-1)Online publication date: 2019
    • (2019)Viral Cascade Probability Estimation and Maximization in Diffusion NetworksIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2018.284099831:3(589-600)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2019
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media