Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2675133.2675297acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Social Sharing of Emotions on Facebook: Channel Differences, Satisfaction, and Replies

Published: 28 February 2015 Publication History

Abstract

People often share emotions with others in order to manage their emotional experiences. We investigate how social media properties such as visibility and directedness affect how people share emotions in Facebook, and their satisfaction after doing so. 141 participants rated 1,628 of their own recent status updates, posts they made on others' timelines, and private messages they sent for intensity, valence, personal relevance, and overall satisfaction felt after sharing each message. For network-visible channels-status updates and posts on others' timelines-they also rated their satisfaction with replies they received. People shared differently between channels, with more intense and negative emotions in private messages. People felt more satisfied after sharing more positive emotions in all channels and after sharing more personally relevant emotions in network-visible channels. Finally, people's overall satisfaction after sharing emotions in network-visible channels is strongly tied to their reply satisfaction. Quality of replies, not just quantity, matters, suggesting the need for designs that help people receive valuable responses to their shared emotions.

References

[1]
Ackerman, M. S. The intellectual challenge of CSCW: the gap between social requirements and technical feasibility. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 2-3 (2000), 179--203.
[2]
Aoki, P. M., and Woodruff, A. Making space for stories: Ambiguity in the design of personal communication systems. In Proc. CHI 2005, ACM Press (2005), 181--190.
[3]
Baron, R. M., and Kenny, D. A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (1986), 1173--1182.
[4]
Barrett, L. F. Solving the emotion paradox: Categorization and the experience of emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 1 (2006), 20--46.
[5]
Bazarova, N. N. Public intimacy: Disclosure interpretation and social judgments on Facebook. Journal of Communication, 62 (2012), 815--832.
[6]
Bazarova, N. N., Chang, P. F., Choi, Y. H., and Loeckenhoff, C. Online social networking across the life span: Extending socioemotional selectivity theory to social network sites. Presented at 7th ICWSM.
[7]
Bazarova, N. N. and Choi, Y. H. Self-disclosure in social media: Extending the functional approach to disclosure motivations and characteristics on social network sites. Journal of Communication, 64 (2014), 635--657.
[8]
Bazarova, N. N., Taft, J. G., Choi, Y. H., and Cosley, D. Managing impressions and relationships on Facebook: Self-presentational and relational concerns revealed through an analysis of language style. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32 (2013), 121--141.
[9]
Bollen, J., Mao, H., and Pepe, A. Modeling public mood and emotion: Twitter sentiment and socio-economic phenomena. In Proc. 5th ICWSM (2011), 450--452.
[10]
Brandimarte, L., Acquisti, A., and Loewenstein, G. Misplaced confidences privacy and the control paradox. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4 (2013), 340--347.
[11]
Brubaker, J. R., Kivran-Swaine, F., Taber, L., and Hayes, G. R. Grief-stricken in a crowd: The language of bereavement and distress in social media. In Proc. 6th ICWSM (2012). 42--49.
[12]
Burke, M., Marlow, C., and Lento, T. Social network activity and social well-being. In Proc. CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 1909--1912.
[13]
Carstensen, L. L. The influence of a sense of time on human development. Science, 312 (2006), 1913--1915.
[14]
Choi, M., and Toma, C. Social sharing through interpersonal media: Patterns and effects on emotional well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 36 (2014), 530--541.
[15]
Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Terveen, L., and Riedl, J. SuggestBot: Using intelligent task routing to help people find work in Wikipedia. In Proc. 12th IUI, ACM Press (2007), 32--41.
[16]
Coviello, L., Sohn, Y., Kramer, A. D. I., Marlow, C., Franceschetti, M., Christakis, N. A., and Fowler, J. H. Detecting emotional contagion in massive social networks. PLoS ONE 9, 3 (2014).
[17]
De Choudhury, M., Counts, S., and Gamon, M. Not all moods are created equal! Exploring human emotional states in social media. In Proc. 6th ICWSM, (2012), 66--73.
[18]
De Choudhury, M., Gamon, M., Counts, S., and Horvitz, E. Predicting depression via social media. In Proc. 7th ICWSM, (2013), 128--137.
[19]
Deters, G. F., and Mehl, M. R. Does posting Facebook status updates increase or decrease loneliness? An online social networking experiment. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4 (2013), 579--586.
[20]
Durcharme, J., Doyle, A. B., and Markiewicz, D. Attachment security with mother and father: Associations with adolescents' reports of interpersonal behavior with parents and peers. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19 (2002), 203--231.
[21]
Golder, S. A., and Macy, M. W. Diurnal and seasonal mood vary with work, sleep, and daylength across diverse cultures. Science, 333 (2011), 1878--1881.
[22]
Hampton, K., Goulet, L. S., Rainie, L., and Purcell, K. Social networking sites and our lives. Report, Pew Internet & American Life Project (2011).
[23]
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., and Norenzayan, A. The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 2-3 (2010), 61--83.
[24]
Goffman, E. (1967). On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
[25]
Kaye, J. J., Levitt, M. K., Nevins, J., Golden, J., and Schmidt, V. Communicating intimacy one bit at a time. In CHI Extended Abstracts 2005, ACM Press (2005), 1529--1532.
[26]
Kivran-Swaine, F., and Naaman, M. Network properties and social sharing of emotions in social awareness streams. In Proc. CSCW 2011, ACM Press (2011), 379--382.
[27]
Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.).
[28]
Kouloumpis, E., Wilson, T., and Moore, J. Twitter sentiment analysis: The good the bad and the OMG! In Proc. 5th ICWSM, (2011), 538--541.
[29]
Kramer, A. D. I. An unobtrusive behavioral model of "gross national happiness." In Proc. CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 287--290.
[30]
Kramer, A. D. I. The spread of emotion via facebook. In Proc. CHI 2012, ACM Press (2014).
[31]
Kramer, A. D. I., and Chung, K. Dimensions of self-expression in Facebook status updates. In Proc. 5th ICWSM, (2011), 169--176.
[32]
Langston, C. A. Capitalizing on and coping with daily-life events: Expressive responses to positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67 (1994), 1112--1125.
[33]
Lin, H., and Qiu, L. Sharing emotions on Facebook: Network size, density, and individual motivation. Ext. Work-in-Progress CHI 2012, ACM Press (2012). 2573--2578.
[34]
Litt, E., Spottswood, E., Birnholitz, J., Hancock, J., Smith, M. E., and Reynolds, L. Awkward encounters of an "other" kind: Collective self-presentation and face threat on Facebook. In Proc. CSCW 2014, ACM Press (2014), 449--460.
[35]
McLaughlin, C., and Vitak, J. Norm evolution and violation on Facebook. New Media & Society 14, 2 (2012), 299--315.
[36]
Naaman, M., Boase, J., and Lai C. Is it really about me? Message content in social awareness streams. In Proc. CSCW 2010, ACM Press (2010), 189--192.
[37]
Park, K., Lee, S., Kim, E., Park, M., Park, J., and Cha, M. Mood and weather: Feeling the heat? In Proc. 7th ICWSM, (2013), 709--712.
[38]
Pennebaker, J. W., Booth, R. J., and Francis, M. E. (2007). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC 2007). Austin, TX: http://www.liwc.net.
[39]
Petronio, S. (2002). Boundaries of privacy: Dialectics of disclosure. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
[40]
Radovanovic, D., and Ragnedda, M. Small talk in the digital age: Making sense of phatic posts. In Proc. 2nd #MSM Workshop, (2012), 10--13.
[41]
Rimé, B. Interpersonal emotion regulation. Handbook of Emotion Regulation, (2007), 466--485.
[42]
Rimé, B. Emotion elicits the social sharing of emotion: Theory and empirical review. Emotion Review, 1 (2009), 60--85.
[43]
Rimé, B., Mesquita, B., Philippot, P., and Boca, S. Beyond the emotional event: Six studies on the social sharing of emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 5 (1991), 435--466.
[44]
Sas, C., Dix, A., Hart, J., and Su, R. Dramaturgical capitalization of positive emotions: The answer for Facebook success? In Proc. 23rd BCS-HCI (2009), 120--129.
[45]
Sosik, V. S., and Bazarova, N. N. Relational maintenance on social network sites: How Facebook communication predicts relational escalation. Computers in Human Behavior, 35 (2014), 124--131.
[46]
Tamir, D. I., and Mitchell, J. P. Disclosing information about the self is intrinsically rewarding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 21 (2012), 8038--8043.
[47]
Toma, C. L., and Hancock, J. T. (2013). Self-affirmation underlies Facebook use. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 321--331.
[48]
Tong, S. T., and Walther, J. B. Relational maintenance and computer-mediated communication. In K. B. Wright & L. M. Webb (Eds), Computer-mediated communication in personal relationships (pp. 98--118). New York: Peter Lang Publishing (2011).
[49]
Zaki, J., and Williams, W. C. Interpersonal emotion regulation, Emotion, 13 (2013), 803--810.
[50]
Zech, E., Rimé, B., and Nils, F. Social sharing of emotion, emotional recovery, and interpersonal aspects. The Regulation of Emotion (2004), 157--185.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Gender-Based Analysis of User Reactions to Facebook PostsBig Data Mining and Analytics10.26599/BDMA.2023.90200057:1(75-86)Online publication date: Mar-2024
  • (2024)Exploring ‘Audience Awareness’ Among Instagram Users : Focusing on the Concept of the Imagined AudienceKorean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies10.20879/kjjcs.2024.68.1.00668:1(193-230)Online publication date: 29-Feb-2024
  • (2024)Traversing Emotional Spaces: Social Media Affordances and Emotion Regulation in Times of Physical IsolationSocial Media + Society10.1177/2056305124123727310:1Online publication date: 20-Mar-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Social Sharing of Emotions on Facebook: Channel Differences, Satisfaction, and Replies

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CSCW '15: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing
    February 2015
    1956 pages
    ISBN:9781450329224
    DOI:10.1145/2675133
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 28 February 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. emotion
    2. facebook
    3. interpersonal emotional regulation
    4. social media
    5. social sharing of emotions

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    CSCW '15
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    CSCW '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 161 of 575 submissions, 28%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

    Upcoming Conference

    CSCW '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)206
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)23
    Reflects downloads up to 18 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Gender-Based Analysis of User Reactions to Facebook PostsBig Data Mining and Analytics10.26599/BDMA.2023.90200057:1(75-86)Online publication date: Mar-2024
    • (2024)Exploring ‘Audience Awareness’ Among Instagram Users : Focusing on the Concept of the Imagined AudienceKorean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies10.20879/kjjcs.2024.68.1.00668:1(193-230)Online publication date: 29-Feb-2024
    • (2024)Traversing Emotional Spaces: Social Media Affordances and Emotion Regulation in Times of Physical IsolationSocial Media + Society10.1177/2056305124123727310:1Online publication date: 20-Mar-2024
    • (2024)Chirp: The Impact of Private Online Self-Disclosure on Perceived Social SupportProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869668:CSCW2(1-25)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
    • (2024)Theorizing Self Visibility on Social Media: A Visibility Objects LensACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/366033731:3(1-28)Online publication date: 22-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Detecting Users' Emotional States during Passive Social Media UseProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36596068:2(1-30)Online publication date: 15-May-2024
    • (2024)People follow emotion display rules when choosing emoticons on social mediaCommunication Research Reports10.1080/08824096.2024.231804041:1(36-48)Online publication date: 26-Feb-2024
    • (2024)Are You as Attractive on Social Media as You Think?Journal of Media Psychology10.1027/1864-1105/a000409Online publication date: 23-Jan-2024
    • (2024)Having fun in micro-celebrity restaurants: The role of social interaction, foodstagramming, and sharing satisfactionInternational Journal of Hospitality Management10.1016/j.ijhm.2024.103768120(103768)Online publication date: Jul-2024
    • (2024)How self-disclosure builds cancer communities through authentic stories on YouTubeComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2024.108226156:COnline publication date: 9-Jul-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media