Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2675133.2675161acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

From The Matrix to a Model of Coordinated Action (MoCA): A Conceptual Framework of and for CSCW

Published: 28 February 2015 Publication History

Abstract

The CSCW community is reliant upon technology-centric models of groupware and collaboration that frame how we examine and design for cooperative work. This paper both reviews the CSCW literature to examine existing models of collaborative work and proposes a new, expanded conceptual model: the Model of Coordinated Action (MoCA). MoCA is a broader framework for describing complex collaborative situations and environments including, but not limited to, collaborations that have diverse, high-turnover memberships or emerging practices. We introduce MoCA's seven dimensions of coordinative action and illustrate their connection to past and current CSCW research. Finally, we discuss some ramifications of MoCA for our understanding of CSCW as a sociotechnical design space.

References

[1]
Al-Ani, B., Mark, G., Chung, J., & Jones, J. (2012). The Egyptian blogosphere: a counter-narrative of the revolution, Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 17--26). Seattle, Washington, USA: ACM.
[2]
Andriessen, J. H. E. Working with Groupware: Understanding and Evaluating Collaboration Technology. Springer, London, UK, 2003.
[3]
Baecker, R. M., Grudin, J., Buxton, W. A. S., & Greenberg, S. Readings in Human-Computer Interaction: Toward the Year 2000 (2nd ed.). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1995.
[4]
Bietz, M. J., Baumer, E. P. S., & Lee, C. P. Synergizing in Cyberinfrastructure Development. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 19, 3--4 (2010), 245--281. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10606-010--9114-y.
[5]
Bietz, M. J., Ferro, T., & Lee, C. P. (2012). Sustaining the development of cyberinfrastructure: an organization adapting to change, Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 901--910). Seattle, Washington, USA: ACM.
[6]
Bietz, M. J., & Lee, C. P. Collaboration in metagenomics: Sequence databases and the organization of scientific work. ECSCW 2009 (2009), 243--262.
[7]
Bietz, M. J., Paine, D., & Lee, C. P. (2013). The work of developing cyberinfrastructure middleware projects, Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 1527--1538). San Antonio, Texas, USA: ACM.
[8]
Chudoba, K. M., Wynn, E., Lu, M., & Watson-Manheim, M. B. How virtual are we? Measuring virtuality and understanding its impact in a global organization. Information Systems Journal, 15, 4 (2005), 279--306. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365--2575.2005.00200.x.
[9]
Costa, J. M., Cataldo, M., & Souza, C. R. d. (2011). The scale and evolution of coordination needs in large-scale distributed projects: implications for the future generation of collaborative tools, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3151--3160). Vancouver, BC, Canada: ACM.
[10]
Cummings, J., Finholt, T., Foster, I., Kesselman, C., & Lawrence, K. A. (2008). Beyond being there: A blueprint for advancing the design, development, and evaluation of virtual organizations.
[11]
DeSanctis, G., & Gallupe, R. B. A Foundation For The Study Of Group Decision Support Systems. Management Science, 33, 5 (1987), 589--609.
[12]
Dix, A., Finlay, J., & Abowd, G. D. Human-computer interaction. Prentice hall, 2004.
[13]
Edwards, P. N., Jackson, S. J., Bowker, G. C., & Knobel, C. P. (2007). Understanding Infrastructure: Dynamics, Tensions, and Design (Workshop Report).
[14]
Ellis, C. A., Gibbs, S. J., & Rein, G. L. (1991, January 1991). Groupware: Some Issues and Experiences. Communications of the ACM, 34, 38--58.
[15]
Ferro, T., & Zachry, M. Networked Knowledge Workers on the Web: An Examination of US Trends, 2008--2010. Handbook of Research on Business Social Networking: Organizational, Managerial, and Technological Dimensions (2011).
[16]
Friedman, B., Kahn Jr, P. H., Hagman, J., Severson, R. L., & Gill, B. The Watcher and the Watched: Social Judgments About Privacy in a Public Place. Human-Computer Interaction, 21, 2 (2006), 235--272. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci2102_3.
[17]
Furnas, G. W. Future design mindful of the MoRAS. Hum.Comput. Interact., 15, 2 (2000), 205--261. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1523_6.
[18]
Gerson, E. M. Reach, Bracket, and the Limits of Rationalized Coordination: Some Challenges for CSCW Resources, CoEvolution and Artifacts. M. S. Ackerman & C. A. Halverson & T. Erickson & W. A. Kellogg, Eds. Springer London, 2008, 193--220. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978--1--84628--9019_8.
[19]
Grudin, J. Computer-supported cooperative work: history and focus. Computer, 27, 5 (1994), 19--26. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/2.291294.
[20]
Grudin, J., & Poltrock, S. E. Taxonomy and theory in computer supported cooperative work. The Oxford Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Oxford University Press, New York (2012).
[21]
Handel, M. J., & Poltrock, S. (2011). Working around official applications: experiences from a large engineering project, Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 309--312). Hangzhou, China: ACM.
[22]
Heath, C., & Luff, P. Collaboration and Control: Crisis Management and Multimedia Technology in London Underground Line Control Rooms. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 1, 1 (1992), 69--94. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00752451.
[23]
Jirotka, M., Lee, C. P., & Olson, G. M. Supporting Scientific Collaboration: Methods, Tools and Concepts. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 22, 4--6 (2013), 667715. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10606-012--9184-0.
[24]
Johansen, R. Groupware: Computer Support for Business Teams. The Free Press, New York, NY, 1988.
[25]
Kriplean, T., Beschastnikh, I., & McDonald, D. W. (2008). Articulations of WikiWork: Uncovering Valued Work in Wikipedia Through Barnstars, Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 4756). San Diego, CA, USA: ACM.
[26]
Latour, B. Science In Action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987.
[27]
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1991.
[28]
Lee, C. P. Boundary Negotiating Artifacts: Unbinding the Routine of Boundary Objects and Embracing Chaos in Collaborative Work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 16 (2007), 307--339.
[29]
Lee, C. P., Bietz, M. J., Derthick, K., & Paine, D. (2012). A sociotechnical exploration of infrastructural middleware development, Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 1347--1350). Seattle, Washington, USA: ACM.
[30]
Lee, C. P., Bietz, M. J., & Thayer, A. Research-Driven Stakeholders in Cyberinfrastructure Use and Development In Proc. International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems, IEEE Press (2010), 163--172.
[31]
Lee, C. P., Dourish, P., & Mark, G. The Human Infrastructure of Cyberinfrastructure. In Proc. CSCW, ACM (2006), 483492.
[32]
Löwgren, J., & Stolterman, E. Thoughtful Interaction Design: A Design Perspective on Information Technology. MIT Press, 2004.
[33]
Lutters, W., & Ackerman, M. Beyond Boundary Objects: Collaborative Reuse in Aircraft Technical Support. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 16, 3 (2007), 341--372. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10606-006--9036-x.
[34]
Malone, T. W. (1988). What is coordination theory? Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
[35]
Morgan, J. T., Bouterse, S., Walls, H., & Stierch, S. (2013). Tea and sympathy: crafting positive new user experiences on wikipedia, Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 839--848). San Antonio, Texas, USA: ACM.
[36]
Morgan, J. T., & Zachry, M. (2010). Negotiating with angry mastodons: the wikipedia policy environment as genre ecology, Proceedings of the 16th ACM international conference on Supporting group work (pp. 165--168). Sanibel Island, Florida, USA: ACM.
[37]
Nardi, B., Whittaker, S., & Schwarz, H. NetWORKers and their Activity in Intensional Networks. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 11, 1--2 (2002), 205--242. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1015241914483.
[38]
Nelson, H. G., & Stolterman, E. The Design Way: Intentional Change in an Unpredictable World (2nd ed.). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2012.
[39]
Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. Distance matters. Hum.-Comput. Interact., 15, 2 (2000), 139--178. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1523_4.
[40]
Olson, J. S., Hofer, E., Bos, N., Zimmerman, A., Olson, G. M., et al. A theory of remote scientific collaboration. Scientific Collaboration on the internet (2008), 73--97.
[41]
Patel, H., Pettitt, M., & Wilson, J. R. Factors of collaborative working: A framework for a collaboration model. Applied Ergonomics, 43, 1 (2012), 1--26. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2011.04.00 9.
[42]
Pollock, N., Williams, R., & D'Adderio, L. Global Software and Its Provenance: Generification Work in the Production of Organizational Software Packages. Social Studies of Science, 37, 2 (2007), 254--280.
[43]
Ribes, D., & Finholt, T. A. The Long Now of Technology Infrastructure: Articulating Tensions in Development. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10, 5 (2009), 375398.
[44]
Sawyer, R. K. Social emergence: Societies as complex systems. Cambridge Univ Press, 2005.
[45]
Schmidt, K. Divided by a common acronym: On the fragmentation of CSCW. ECSCW 2009 (2009), 223--242.
[46]
Schmidt, K., & Bannon, L. Taking CSCW seriously. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 1, 1 (1992), 7--40. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00752449.
[47]
Schmidt, K., & Bannon, L. Constructing CSCW: The First Quarter Century. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 22, 4--6 (2013), 345--372. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10606-013--9193--7.
[48]
Schmidt, K., & Simone, C. Coordination mechanisms: Towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW systems design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 5, 2 (1996), 155--200. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00133655.
[49]
Schmidt, K., & Wagner, I. Ordering Systems: Coordinative Practices and Artifacts in Architectural Design and Planning. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 13 (2004), 349--408.
[50]
Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C., Cohen, M., & Jacobs, S. Designing the user interface: strategies for effective humancomputer interaction (5 ed.). Addison-Wesley Computing, 1998.
[51]
Starbird, K., & Palen, L. (2012). (How) will the revolution be retweeted?: information diffusion and the 2011 Egyptian uprising, Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 7--16). Seattle, Washington, USA: ACM.
[52]
Starbird, K., & Palen, L. (2013). Working and sustaining the virtual "Disaster Desk", Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 491--502). San Antonio, Texas, USA: ACM.
[53]
Stebbins, R. A. Serious Leisure: A Conceptual Statement. The Pacific Sociological Review, 25, 2 (1982), 251--272. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1388726.
[54]
Strauss, A. The articulation of project work: An organizational process. The Sociological Quarterly, 29, 2 (1988), 163--178.
[55]
Thayer, A., Bietz, M. J., Derthick, K., & Lee, C. P. (2012). I love you, let's share calendars: calendar sharing as relationship work, Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 749--758). Seattle, Washington, USA: ACM.
[56]
Wenger, E. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1998.
[57]
Yasuoka, M. (2009). Bridging and Breakdowns - Using computational artifacts across social worlds. IT University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Revisiting Grudin’s eight challenges for developers of groupware technologies 30 years lateri-com10.1515/icom-2023-003923:1(7-31)Online publication date: 21-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Forming Shared Interest Pods: Barriers to Self-Assembly of Interest-Based Small Groups, and Dynamics of Retaining and Giving up Control to Find Collective FitProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869848:CSCW2(1-50)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Imagining the Hybrid Workspace as a "Third Space": Participatory Speculations on the Unique Qualities of the Hybrid Cooperative SpaceCompanion Publication of the 2024 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/3678884.3681881(393-397)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. From The Matrix to a Model of Coordinated Action (MoCA): A Conceptual Framework of and for CSCW

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CSCW '15: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing
    February 2015
    1956 pages
    ISBN:9781450329224
    DOI:10.1145/2675133
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 28 February 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. conceptual frameworks
    2. cscw
    3. theory

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    CSCW '15
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    CSCW '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 161 of 575 submissions, 28%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

    Upcoming Conference

    CSCW '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)248
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)50
    Reflects downloads up to 25 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Revisiting Grudin’s eight challenges for developers of groupware technologies 30 years lateri-com10.1515/icom-2023-003923:1(7-31)Online publication date: 21-Mar-2024
    • (2024)Forming Shared Interest Pods: Barriers to Self-Assembly of Interest-Based Small Groups, and Dynamics of Retaining and Giving up Control to Find Collective FitProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869848:CSCW2(1-50)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
    • (2024)Imagining the Hybrid Workspace as a "Third Space": Participatory Speculations on the Unique Qualities of the Hybrid Cooperative SpaceCompanion Publication of the 2024 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/3678884.3681881(393-397)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2024
    • (2024)Unpacking the Dynamics of Harm in Game Cheating Communities: A Guiding Framework for Cross-Industry InterventionGames: Research and Practice10.1145/36565582:2(1-17)Online publication date: 8-Aug-2024
    • (2024)Characterising CSCW Research on Human-Robot CollaborationProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36409998:CSCW1(1-31)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
    • (2024)IRECS Framework: Identification of Requirements for Enterprise Collaboration SystemsProcedia Computer Science10.1016/j.procs.2024.06.320239(1467-1475)Online publication date: 2024
    • (2024)Identifying Workgroup Dimensions and Their Implications for the Design of Digital WorkspacesProcedia Computer Science10.1016/j.procs.2024.06.171239(265-274)Online publication date: 2024
    • (2023)A Maturity Model for Intraorganizational Online CollaborationInternational Journal of e-Collaboration10.4018/IJeC.31577819:1(1-21)Online publication date: 6-Jan-2023
    • (2023)Designing for Hybrid Intelligence: A Taxonomy and Survey of Crowd-Machine InteractionApplied Sciences10.3390/app1304219813:4(2198)Online publication date: 8-Feb-2023
    • (2023)Form to Flow: Exploring Challenges and Roles of Conversational UX Designers in Real-world, Multi-channel Service EnvironmentsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36101897:CSCW2(1-24)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media