Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2663204.2663229acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Deception detection using a multimodal approach

Published: 12 November 2014 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper we address the automatic identification of deceit by using a multimodal approach. We collect deceptive and truthful responses using a multimodal setting where we acquire data using a microphone, a thermal camera, as well as physiological sensors. Among all available modalities, we focus on three modalities namely, language use, physiological response, and thermal sensing. To our knowledge, this is the first work to integrate these specific modalities to detect deceit. Several experiments are carried out in which we first select representative features for each modality, and then we analyze joint models that integrate several modalities. The experimental results show that the combination of features from different modalities significantly improves the detection of deceptive behaviors as compared to the use of one modality at a time. Moreover, the use of non-contact modalities proved to be comparable with and sometimes better than existing contact-based methods. The proposed method increases the efficiency of detecting deceit by avoiding human involvement in an attempt to move towards a completely automated non-invasive deception detection process.

References

[1]
C. F. J. Bond and B. M. DePaulo. Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10:214--234, 2006.
[2]
B. M. Depaulo, B. E. Malone, J. J. Lindsay, L. Muhlenbruck, K. Charlton, H. Cooper, B. M. Depaulo, B. E. Malone, D. O. Psychology, J. J. Lindsay, L. Muhlenbruck, and K. Charlton. Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, pages 74--118, 2003.
[3]
P. A. Granhag and M. Hartwig. A new theoretical perspective on deception detection: On the psychology of instrumental mind-reading. Psychology, Crime & Law, 14(3):189--200, 2008.
[4]
J. Hirschberg, S. Benus, J. Brenier, F. Enos, S. Friedman, S. Gilman, C. Gir, G. Graciarena, A. Kathol, and L. Michaelis. Distinguishing deceptive from non-deceptive speech. In In Proceedings of Interspeech 2005 - Eurospeech, pages 1833--1836, 2005.
[5]
D. Howard and C. Kirchhübel. Acoustic correlates of deceptive speech: an exploratory study. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics, EPCE'11, pages 28--37, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011. Springer-Verlag.
[6]
U. Jain, B. Tan, and Q. Li. Concealed knowledge identification using facial thermal imaging. In 2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 1677--1680, March 2012.
[7]
A. Merla and G. Romani. Thermal signatures of emotional arousal: A functional infrared imaging study. In 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS., pages 247--249, Aug 2007.
[8]
M. Newman, J. Pennebaker, D. Berry, and J. Richards. Lying words: Predicting deception from linguistic styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 2003.
[9]
K. K. Park, H. W. Suk, H. Hwang, and J.-H. Lee. A functional analysis of deception detection of a mock crime using infrared thermal imaging and the concealed information test. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 2013.
[10]
I. Pavlidis, N. L. Eberhardt, and J. A. Levine. Human behavior: Seeing through the face of deception. Nature, 415(6867):35--35, 2002.
[11]
I. Pavlidis and J. Levine. Monitoring of periorbital blood flow rate through thermal image analysis and its application to polygraph testing. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society., volume 3, pages 2826--2829, 2001.
[12]
I. Pavlidis and J. Levine. Thermal image analysis for polygraph testing. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, 21(6):56--64, Nov 2002.
[13]
I. Pavlidis, J. Levine, and P. Baukol. Thermal imaging for anxiety detection. In IEEE Workshop on Computer Vision Beyond the Visible Spectrum: Methods and Applications., pages 104--109, 2000.
[14]
J. Pennebaker and M. Francis. Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC, 1999. Erlbaum Publishers.
[15]
D. Pollina, A. Dollins, S. Senter, T. Brown, I. Pavlidis, J. Levine, and A. Ryan. Facial skin surface temperature changes during a "concealed information" test. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 34(7):1182--1189, 2006.
[16]
T. Qin, J. K. Burgoon, J. P. Blair, and J. F. Nunamaker. Modality effects in deception detection and applications in automatic deception-detection. In Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2005.
[17]
B. Rajoub and R. Zwiggelaar. Thermal facial analysis for deception detection. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, PP(99):1--1, 2014.
[18]
V. Rubin. On deception and deception detection: Content analysis of computer-mediated stated beliefs. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47(1):1--10, 2010.
[19]
M. Sezgin and B. Sankur. Survey over image thresholding techniques and quantitative performance evaluation. Journal of Electronic Imaging, 13(1):146--168, 2004.
[20]
S. Sumriddetchkajorn and A. Somboonkaew. Thermal analyzer enables improved lie detection in criminal-suspect interrogations. In SPIE Newsroom: Defense & Security, 2011.
[21]
P. Tsiamyrtzis, J. Dowdall, D. Shastri, I. Pavlidis, M. Frank, and P. Eckman. Lie detection - recovery of the periorbital signal through tandem tracking and noise suppression in thermal facial video. In SPIE Conference on Sensors and Command Control Communications and Intelligence Technologies for Homeland Security and Homeland Defense, 2005.
[22]
P. Viola and M. Jones. Robust real-time face detection. International Journal of Computer Vision, 57(2):137--154, 2004.
[23]
A. Vrij, P. Granhag, and S. Porter. Pitfalls and Opportunities in Nonverbal and Verbal Lie Detection. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 11(3):89--121, Dec. 2010.
[24]
A. Vrij, S. Leal, P. Granhag, S. Mann, R. Fisher, J. Hillman, and K. Sperry. Outsmarting the liars: The benefit of asking unanticipated questions. Law and Human Behavior, 33(2):159--166, 2009.
[25]
L. Warmelink, A. Vrij, S. Mann, S. Leal, D. Forrester, and R. Fisher. Thermal imaging as a lie detection tool at airports. Law and Human Behavior, 35(1):40--48, 2011.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Deception Detection from Linguistic and Physiological Data Streams Using Bimodal Convolutional Neural Networks2024 5th International Conference on Information Science, Parallel and Distributed Systems (ISPDS)10.1109/ISPDS62779.2024.10667569(263-267)Online publication date: 31-May-2024
  • (2024)Applications of AI-Enabled Deception Detection Using Video, Audio, and Physiological Data: A Systematic ReviewIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.346282512(135207-135240)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)MVis4LD: Multimodal Visual Interactive System for Lie DetectionIntelligent Information and Database Systems10.1007/978-981-97-4985-0_3(28-43)Online publication date: 16-Jul-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ICMI '14: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Multimodal Interaction
November 2014
558 pages
ISBN:9781450328852
DOI:10.1145/2663204
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 12 November 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. deception detection
  2. multimodal processing

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

ICMI '14
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

ICMI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 51 of 127 submissions, 40%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 453 of 1,080 submissions, 42%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)47
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
Reflects downloads up to 21 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Deception Detection from Linguistic and Physiological Data Streams Using Bimodal Convolutional Neural Networks2024 5th International Conference on Information Science, Parallel and Distributed Systems (ISPDS)10.1109/ISPDS62779.2024.10667569(263-267)Online publication date: 31-May-2024
  • (2024)Applications of AI-Enabled Deception Detection Using Video, Audio, and Physiological Data: A Systematic ReviewIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.346282512(135207-135240)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)MVis4LD: Multimodal Visual Interactive System for Lie DetectionIntelligent Information and Database Systems10.1007/978-981-97-4985-0_3(28-43)Online publication date: 16-Jul-2024
  • (2023)AnswerTruthDetector: a combined cognitive load approach for separating truthful from deceptive answers in computer-administered questionnairesi-com10.1515/icom-2023-002322:3(241-251)Online publication date: 9-Nov-2023
  • (2023)Deception detection with machine learning: A systematic review and statistical analysisPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.028132318:2(e0281323)Online publication date: 9-Feb-2023
  • (2023)Behavioral Indicators of Deception and Associated Mental States: Scientific Myths and RealitiesJournal of Nonverbal Behavior10.1007/s10919-023-00441-w48:1(11-23)Online publication date: 26-Sep-2023
  • (2022)Emotion Classification from Speech and Text in Videos Using a Multimodal ApproachMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti60400286:4(28)Online publication date: 12-Apr-2022
  • (2022)Modeling Non-Cooperative Dialogue: Theoretical and Empirical InsightsTransactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics10.1162/tacl_a_0050710(1084-1102)Online publication date: 19-Sep-2022
  • (2022)Fine-Grained Question-Level Deception Detection via Graph-Based Learning and Cross-Modal FusionIEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security10.1109/TIFS.2022.318679917(2452-2467)Online publication date: 2022
  • (2022)LieNet: A Deep Convolution Neural Network Framework for Detecting DeceptionIEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems10.1109/TCDS.2021.308601114:3(971-984)Online publication date: Sep-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media