Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
research-article

Coverage quality and smoothness criteria for online view selection in a multi-camera network

Published: 31 January 2014 Publication History

Abstract

The problem of online selection of monocular view sequences for an arbitrary task in a calibrated multi-camera network is investigated. An objective function for the quality of a view sequence is derived from a novel task-oriented, model-based instantaneous coverage quality criterion and a criterion of the smoothness of view transitions over time. The former is quantified by a priori information about the camera system, environment, and task generally available in the target application class. The latter is derived from qualitative definitions of undesirable transition effects. A scalable online algorithm with robust suboptimal performance is presented based on this objective function. Experimental results demonstrate the performance of the method—and therefore the criteria—as well as its robustness to several identified sources of nonsmoothness.

References

[1]
Jose Luis Alarcon Herrera, Aaron Mavrinac, and Xiang Chen. 2011. Sensor planning for range cameras via a coverage strength model. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics. 838--843.
[2]
Herbert Bay, Tinne Tuytelaars, and Luc Van Gool. 2006. SURF: Speeded up robust features. In Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Computer Vision. 404--417.
[3]
Duane C. Brown. 1966. Decentering distortion of lenses. Photogrammetric Engin. 32, 3, 444--462.
[4]
Qin Cai and Jake K. Aggarwal. 1999. Tracking human motion in structured environments using a distributed-camera system. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 21, 11, 1241--1247.
[5]
Fahad Daniyal, Murtaza Taj, and Andrea Cavallaro. 2009. Content and task-based view selection from multiple video streams. Multimedia Tools Appl. 46, 235--258.
[6]
Ugur Murat Erdem and Stan Sclaroff. 2012. Event prediction in a hybrid camera network. ACM Trans. Sens. Netw. 8, 2, 1--27.
[7]
Ye-Peng Guan. 2009. Automatic optimal view selection for natural hci. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Congress on Image and Signal Processing (CISP'09). 1--5.
[8]
Abhinav Gupta, Anurag Mittal, and Larry S. Davis. 2007. COST: An approach for camera selection and multi-object inference ordering in dynamic scenes. In Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 1--8.
[9]
Chris Harris and Mike Stephens. 1988. A combined corner and edge detector. In Proceedings of the 4th Alvey Vision Conference. 147--151.
[10]
Volkan Isler, Sanjeev Khanna, John Spletzer, and Camillo J. Taylor. 2005. Target tracking with distributed sensors: The focus of attention problem. Comput. Vis. Image Understand. 100, 1--2, 225--247.
[11]
Hao Jiang, Sidney Fels, and James J. Little. 2008. Optimizing multiple object tracking and best view video synthesis. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 10, 6, 997--1012.
[12]
Huang Lee, Linda Tessens, Marleen Morbee, Hamid Aghajan, and Wilfried Philips. 2008. Sub-optimal camera selection in practical vision networks through shape approximation. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference Advanced Concepts for Intelligent Vision Systems. 266--277.
[13]
David G. Lowe. 2004. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 60, 2, 91--110.
[14]
Yi Ma, Stefano Soatto, Jana Kosecka, and S. Shankar Sastry. 2004. An Invitation to 3-D Computer Vision. Springer.
[15]
Renita Machado, Wensheng Zhang, Guiling Wang, and Sirin Tekinay. 2010. Coverage properties of clustered wireless sensor networks. ACM Trans. Sens. Netw. 7, 2, 1--21.
[16]
Aaron Mavrinac, Jose Luis Alarcon Herrera, and Xiang Chen. 2010a. A fuzzy model for coverage evaluation of cameras and multi-camera networks. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Confeerence Distributed Smart Cameras. 95--102.
[17]
Aaron Mavrinac, Jose Luis Alarcon Herrera, and Xiang Chen. 2010b. Evaluating the fuzzy coverage model for 3d multi-camera network applications. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Robotics and Applications. 692--701.
[18]
Aaron Mavrinac and Xiang Chen. 2013. Modeling coverage in camera networks: A survey. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 101, 1, 205--226.
[19]
Aaron Mavrinac, Durga Rajan, Yonghong Tan, and Xiang Chen. 2012. Task-oriented optimal view selection in a calibrated multi-camera system. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics.
[20]
Tomas Moller and Ben Trumbore. 1997. Fast, minimum storage ray/triangle intersection. J. Graph. Tools 2, 1, 21--28.
[21]
Marleen Morbee, Linda Tessens, Huang Lee, Wilfried Philips, and Hamid Aghajan. 2008. Optimal camera selection in vision networks for shape approximation. In Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing. 46--51.
[22]
Kim C. Ng, Hiroshi Ishiguro, Mohan Trivedi, and Takushi Sogo. 2004. An integrated surveillance system human tracking and view synthesis using multiple omni-directional vision sensors. Image Vis. Comput. 22, 7, 551--561.
[23]
Han-Saem Park, Soojung Lim, Jun-Ki Min, and Sung-Bae Cho. 2008. Optimal view selection and event retrieval in multi-camera office environment. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multisensor Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems. 106--110.
[24]
Johnny Park, Priya C. Bhat, and Avinash C. Kak. 2006. A look-up table based approach for solving the camera selection problem in large camera networks. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Distributed Smart Cameras.
[25]
Richard J. Radke. 2010. A survey of distributed computer vision algorithms. In Handbook of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, Hideyuki Nakashima, Hamid Aghajan, and Juan Carlos Augusto, Eds., Springer, 35--55.
[26]
Changsong Shen, Chris Zhang, and Sidney Fels. 2007. A multi-camera surveillance system that estimates quality-of-view measurement. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference Image Processing. 193--196.
[27]
Babak Shirmohammadi and Camillo J. Taylor. 2012. Self-localizing smart camera networks. ACM Trans. Sens. Netw. 8, 2, 1--26.
[28]
Lauro Snidaro, Ruixin Niu, Pramod K. Varshney, and Gian Luca Foresti. 2003. Automatic camera selection and fusion for outdoor surveillance under changing weather conditions. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance. 364--369.
[29]
Stanislava Soro and Wendi B. Heinzelman. 2007. Camera selection in visual sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance. 81--86.
[30]
Linda Tessens, Marleen Morbee, Huang Lee, Wilfried Philips, and Hamid Aghajan. 2008. Principal view determination for camera selection in distributed smart camera networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Distributed Smart Cameras.
[31]
Pere-Pau Vazquez, Miquel Feixas, Mateu Sbert, and Wolfgang Heidrich. 1999. Viewpoint selection using viewpoint entropy. In Proceedings of the Vision, Modeling, and Visualization Conference. 274--280.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Simultaneous Coverage and Mapping of Stereo Camera Network for Unknown Deformable ObjectIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement10.1109/TIM.2023.334653073(1-10)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2022)A Multiresolution Approach for Large Real-World Camera Placement Optimization ProblemsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2022.317681710(61601-61616)Online publication date: 2022
  • (2022)Surface profile-guided scan method for autonomous 3D reconstruction of unknown objects using an industrial robotThe Visual Computer: International Journal of Computer Graphics10.1007/s00371-021-02241-z38:11(3953-3977)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks
ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks  Volume 10, Issue 2
January 2014
609 pages
ISSN:1550-4859
EISSN:1550-4867
DOI:10.1145/2575808
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Journal Family

Publication History

Published: 31 January 2014
Accepted: 01 March 2013
Revised: 01 December 2012
Received: 01 July 2012
Published in TOSN Volume 10, Issue 2

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Camera networks
  2. camera selection
  3. sensor coverage

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 26 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Simultaneous Coverage and Mapping of Stereo Camera Network for Unknown Deformable ObjectIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement10.1109/TIM.2023.334653073(1-10)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2022)A Multiresolution Approach for Large Real-World Camera Placement Optimization ProblemsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2022.317681710(61601-61616)Online publication date: 2022
  • (2022)Surface profile-guided scan method for autonomous 3D reconstruction of unknown objects using an industrial robotThe Visual Computer: International Journal of Computer Graphics10.1007/s00371-021-02241-z38:11(3953-3977)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2022
  • (2021)Radial Coverage Strength for Optimization of Monocular Multicamera DeploymentIEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics10.1109/TMECH.2021.305608126:6(3221-3231)Online publication date: Dec-2021
  • (2020)Distributed $\mathcal{H}_\infty$ Gaussian Consensus Filtering for Discrete-Time Systems over Lossy Sensor NetworksSIAM Journal on Control and Optimization10.1137/19M127370058:1(34-58)Online publication date: 2-Jan-2020
  • (2019)Decentralized and Resource-efficient Self-Calibration of Visual Sensor NetworksAd Hoc Networks10.1016/j.adhoc.2019.01.007Online publication date: Mar-2019
  • (2018)A Visual Distance Approach for Multicamera Deployment With Coverage OptimizationIEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics10.1109/TMECH.2018.283439323:3(1007-1018)Online publication date: Jun-2018
  • (2017)Placement Strategy of Multi-Camera Volumetric Surveillance System for Activities MonitoringProceedings of the 11th International Conference on Distributed Smart Cameras10.1145/3131885.3131911(113-118)Online publication date: 5-Sep-2017
  • (2017)On performance measurement for a heterogeneous planar field sensor network2017 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM)10.1109/AIM.2017.8014013(166-171)Online publication date: Jul-2017
  • (2016)Global Coverage Maximization in PTZ-Camera Networks Based on Visual Quality AssessmentIEEE Sensors Journal10.1109/JSEN.2016.258417916:16(6317-6332)Online publication date: Aug-2016
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media