Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2506095.2506113acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesairConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Robust Reactive Mobile Robot Navigation with Modified DWA+CG

Published: 04 July 2013 Publication History

Abstract

A robust reactive collision avoidance method is presented taking into account of mobile robot kinematic and dynamic constraints. Many of the earlier standard reactive navigation methods provide most preferable direction as a solution to navigation but do not consider dynamic constraints. Even, the most recent approach of gap-based navigation found in the literature, that overcomes many of the shortcomings of earlier methods, is a directional method and lacks in addressing the issue of robot dynamics. On the other hand, Dynamic Window Approach (DWA) explicitly takes account of vehicle dynamics and obstacle avoidance into its design, but suffers from common pitfalls associated with reactive methods. Here, we propose evolving a robust reactive method integrating DWA and Closest Gap (CG) based methods together with minor modification that takes advantages of both and eliminates disadvantages of each of the methods. By this, we address the problem of incorporating robot dynamics into directional methods. The effectiveness of the proposed method will be demonstrated with both simulated and experimental results.

References

[1]
O. Khatib. Real-time obstacle avoidance for manipulators and mobile robots. In IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pages 500--505, 1985.
[2]
Y. Koren and J. Borenstein. Potential field methods and their inherent limitations for mobile robot navigation. In IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pages 1398--1404, 1991.
[3]
J. Borenstein and Y. Koren. Real-time obstacle avoidance for fast mobile robots. IEEE Trnsaction on System, Man, and cybernetics, 19(5):1179--1187, 1989.
[4]
J. Borenstein and Y. Koren. The vector field histogram - fast obstacle avoidance for mobile robots. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, 7(3):278--288, 1991.
[5]
I. Ulrich and J. Borenstein. VFH+: Reliable obstacle avoidance for fast mobile robots. In IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pages 1572--1577, 1998.
[6]
P. K. Pal and Asim Kar. Sensor-based mobile robot navigation through supervised learning on neural net. Autonomous Robots, 3:355--374, 1996.
[7]
S. S. Ge, X. C. Lai. and A. A. Mamun. Boundary following and globally convergent path planning using instant goals. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 35(2):1--15, 2005.
[8]
M. Wang and J. N. Liva. Fuzzy logic-based real-time robot navigation in unknown environment with dead ends. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 56(7):625--643, 2008.
[9]
C. Ordonez, E. G. C. Jr., M. F. Shelekwa., and D. D. Dunlap. The virtual wall approach to limit cycle avoidance for unmanned ground vehicle. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 56(8):651--657, 2008.
[10]
R. Simmons. The curvature-velocity method for local obstacle avoidance. In IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pages 3375--3382, 1996.
[11]
D. Fox, W. Burgard and S. Thrun. The dynamic window approach to collision avoidance. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 4(1):23--33, 1997.
[12]
N. Yong Ko and R. Simmons. The lane-curvature method for local obstacle avoidance. In IEEE/RJS int. conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, volume 3, pages 1615--1621, 1998.
[13]
O. Brock and O. Khatib. High-speed navigation using global dynamic window approach. In IEEE int. conf. on Robotics and Automation, pages 341--346, 1999.
[14]
J. Minguez, L. Montano and O. Khatib. Reactive collision avoidance for navigation with dynamic constraint. In IEEE/RJS int. conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, volume 1, pages 588--594, 2002.
[15]
K. Rebai, O. Azouaoui and N. Ouadah. Bi-steerable robot navigation using a modified dynamic window approach. In IEEE International Conference on Advanced Robotics, pages 1--6, 2009.
[16]
J. Minguez and L. Montano. Nearness diagram (nd) navigation: Collision avoidance in troublesome scenarios. IEEE Transaction on Robotics and Automation, 20(1):45--59, 2004.
[17]
J. Minguez, J. Osuna and L. Montano. A "divide and conquer" strategy based on situations to achieve reactive collision avoidance in troublesome scenarios. In IEEE int. conf. on Robotics and Automation, pages 3855--3862, 2004.
[18]
J. W. Durham and F. Bullo. Smooth nearness-diagram navigation. In IEEE/RJS int. conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pages 690--695, 2008.
[19]
M. Mujahad, D. Fischer, B. Mertsching and H. Jaddu. Closest gap based (CG) reactive obstacle avoidance navigation for highly cluttered environments. In IEEE/RJS int. conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pages 1805--1812, 2010.
[20]
J. Buhmann, W. Burgard, A. B. Cremers, D. Fox, T. Hofmann, F. Schneider, J. Strikos and S. Thrun. The mobile robot Rhino. In AI Magazine, 16(1), 1995.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
AIR '13: Proceedings of Conference on Advances In Robotics
July 2013
366 pages
ISBN:9781450323475
DOI:10.1145/2506095
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 04 July 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Mobile robot
  2. collision avoidance
  3. dynamic constraint
  4. gap based navigation
  5. reactive navigation

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

AIR '13
AIR '13: Advances In Robotics 2013
July 4 - 6, 2013
Pune, India

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 69 of 140 submissions, 49%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 114
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 20 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media