Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2598510.2598533acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A constraint-based understanding of design spaces

Published: 21 June 2014 Publication History

Abstract

This paper suggests a framework for understanding and manoeuvring design spaces based on insights from research into creativity constraints. We define the design space as a conceptual space, which in addition to being co-constituted, explored and developed by the designer encompasses the creativity constraints governing the design process. While design spaces can be highly complex, our constraint-based understanding enables us to argue for the benefits of a systematic approach to mapping and manipulating aspects of the design space. We discuss how designers by means of a simple representation, a design space schema, can identify the properties of the prospective product that s/he can form. Through a case study, we show how design space schemas can support designers in various ways, including gaining an overview of the design process, documenting it, reflecting on it, and developing design concepts. Finally, we discuss the potentials and limitations of this approach.

References

[1]
Amabile, T.M. Creativity in Context: Update to "The Social Psychology of Creativity." Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1996.
[2]
Askland, H.H., Ostwald, M., and Williams, A. Changing conceptualisations of creativity in design. Proc. Desire 2010, ACM Press (2010), 4--11.
[3]
Beaudouin-Lafon, and M., Mackay, W. Prototyping tools and techniques, in Jacko, J.A., Sears, A. (eds.). The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook. (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, (2003), 1017--1040.
[4]
Benyon, D. Designing Interactive Systems: A Comprehensive Guide to HCI and Interaction Design. Addison Wesley, Harlow, UK, 2010.
[5]
Biskjaer, M.M., and Halskov, K. Decisive constraints as a creative resource in interaction design. Digital Creativity 25, 1 (2014), 27--61.
[6]
Biskjaer, M.M. Self-Imposed Creativity Constraints. PhD diss. Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark, 2013.
[7]
Biskjaer, M.M., Dalsgaard, P., and Halskov, K. Creativity methods in interaction design. Proc. Desire 2010, ACM Press (2010), 12--21.
[8]
Boden, M.A. The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms (2nd ed.). Routledge, London, 1990/2004.
[9]
Callon, M. Techno-economic networks and irreversibility, in Law, J. (ed.). A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. Routledge, London (1991), 132--161.
[10]
Chandrasekaran, B. Design problem solving: A task analysis. AI magazine 11, 4 (1990), 59--71.
[11]
Dalsgaard, P. and Halskov, K. 3D projection on physical objects: Design insights from five real life cases. Proc. CHI 2011, ACM Press (2011), 1041--1050.
[12]
Dalsgaard, P., Halskov, K., and Nielsen, R. Maps for design reflection. Artifact 2, 3-4 (2008), 176--189.
[13]
Dalsgaard, P., Halskov, K., and Nielsen, R.: A design space explorer for media façades. Proc. OZCHI 2008, ACM Press (2008), 219--226.
[14]
Dorst, K., and Cross, N. Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem-solution. Design Studies 22, 5 (2001), 425--437.
[15]
Dorst, K. Describing Design: A Comparison of Paradigms. PhD diss. Delft University of Technology Press, Delft, Belgium, 1997.
[16]
Elster, J. Ulysses Unbound: Studies in Rationality, Precommitment, and Constraints. Cambridge UP, Cambridge, UK, 2000.
[17]
Floyd, C. A systematic look at prototyping, in Budde, R., Kuhlenkamp, K., Matthiassen, L, & Züllighoven, H. (eds.). Approaches to Prototyping. Springer, Berlin, (1984), 1--18.
[18]
Goel, V., and Pirolli, P. The structure of design problem spaces. Cognitive science 16, 3 (1992), 395--429.
[19]
Heape, C. The Design Space: The Design Process as the Construction, Exploration and Expansion of a Conceptual Space. PhD diss. The University of Southern Denmark, Sønderborg, Denmark, 2007.
[20]
Joyce, C.K. The Blank Page: Effects of Constraint on Creativity. PhD diss. University of California, Berkeley, CA, 2009.
[21]
Kaufman, J.C., and Sternberg, R.J. (eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge UP, Cambridge, UK, 2010.
[22]
Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1980.
[23]
Lanzara, G.F., and Mathiassen, L. Mapping Situations Within a System Development Project. (DAIMI PB-179, MARS report #6), Aarhus University, Denmark, 1984.
[24]
Lawson, B. How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified. Elsevier/Architectural, Burlington, MA, 2006.
[25]
Lucero, A., Vaajakallio, K., and Dalsgaard, P. The dialogue-labs method: Process, space and materials as structuring elements to spark dialogue in co-design events. CoDesign 8, 1 (2012), 1--23.
[26]
MacLean, A., Young, R.M., Belotti, V.M.E., and Moran, T.P. Questions, options, and criteria: Elements of design space analysis. Human-Computer Interaction 6, 3--4 (1991), 201--250.
[27]
Maher, M., and Tang, H.-H. Co-evolution as a computational and cognitive model of design. Research in Engineering Design 14, 1 (2003), 47--64.
[28]
Maher, M.L. A model of co-evolutionary design. Engineering with Computers 16, 3--4 (2000), 195--208.
[29]
Maher, M.L., and Poon, J. Modeling design exploration as co-evolution. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 11, 3 (1996), 195--209.
[30]
McDonnell, J. Impositions of order: A comparison between design and fine art practices. Design Studies 32, 6 (2011), 557--572.
[31]
Muller, M.J. Participatory design: The third space in HCI, in Jacko, J.A., Sears, A. (eds.). The HumanComputer Interaction Handbook. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, (2002), 1051--1068.
[32]
Onarheim, B., and Wiltschnig, S. Opening and constraining: Constraints and their role in creative processes. Proc. Desire2010, ACM Press (2010), 83--89.
[33]
Onarheim, B., and Biskjaer, M.M. 2013. An introduction to 'creativity constraints'. Proc. ISPIM 2013 (2013), 1--16.
[34]
Onarheim, B. Creativity from constraints in engineering design: Lessons learned at Coloplast. Journal of Engineering Design 23, 4 (2012), 323--336.
[35]
Onarheim, B. Creativity under Constraints: Creativity as Balancing 'Constrainedness'. PhD diss. Copenhagen Business School, Denmark, 2012.
[36]
Poon, J., and Maher, M.L. Co-evolution and emergence in design. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering 11, 3 (1997), 319--327.
[37]
Reitman, W.R. Heuristic decision procedures, open contraints, and the structure of ill-defined problems, in Shelley, M.W., and Bryan, G.L. (eds.). Human Judgments and Optimality. Wiley, New York City, NY, (1964), 282--315.
[38]
Schön, D.A. The Reflective Practitioner. Basic Books, New York City, NY, 1983.
[39]
Schön, D.A. Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation. Knowledge-Based Systems 5, 1 (1992), 3--14.
[40]
Schön, D.A. Educating the Reflective Practitioner. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 1987.
[41]
Simon, H.A. 1996. The Sciences of the Artificial. (3rd ed.). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1969/1996.
[42]
Simon, H.A., and Newell, A. Human problem solving: The state of the theory in 1970. American Psychologist 26, 2 (1971), 145--159.
[43]
Simon, H.A. The structure of ill structured problems. Artificial intelligence 4, 3--4 (1973), 181--201.
[44]
Star, S.L., and Griesemer, J.R. Institutional ecology, 'translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907--39. Social Studies of Science 19, 3 (1989), 387--420.
[45]
Sternberg, R.J., and Kaufman, J.C. Constraints on creativity: Obvious and not so obvious, in Kaufman, J.C., and Sternberg, R.J. (eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge UP, Cambridge, UK (2010), 467--482.
[46]
Stokes, P.D. Creativity from Constraints: The Psychology of Breakthrough. Springer, New York City, NY, 2006.
[47]
Stokes, P.D. Using constraints to create novelty: A case study. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 3, 3 (2009), 174--180.
[48]
Vandenbosch, B., and Gallagher, K. 2004. The role of constraints, in Boland Jr., R.J., and Collopy, F. (eds.). Managing as Designing. Stanford UP, Stanford, CA, (2004), 198--202.
[49]
Wiltschnig, S., Christensen, B.T., Ball, L.J. Collaborative problem-solution co-evolution in creative design. Design Studies 34, 5 (2013), 515--542.
[50]
Zwicky, F. Discovery, Invention, Research - Through the Morphological Approach. Macmillian, Toronto, 1969.
[51]
Zwicky, F. and Wilson, A.G. (eds.). New Methods of Thought and Procedure: Contributions to the Symposium on Methodologies. Springer, Berlin, 1967.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Let Information Flow Into Awareness: A Design Space for Human-Like Experiences to Promote Informal Communication for Hybrid WorkProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661549(1666-1680)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Input Visualization: Collecting and Modifying Data with Visual RepresentationsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642808(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Luminate: Structured Generation and Exploration of Design Space with Large Language Models for Human-AI Co-CreationProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642400(1-26)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. A constraint-based understanding of design spaces

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    DIS '14: Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems
    June 2014
    1102 pages
    ISBN:9781450329026
    DOI:10.1145/2598510
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 21 June 2014

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. creativity constraints
    2. design processes
    3. design space
    4. problem space
    5. solution space

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    DIS '14
    Sponsor:
    DIS '14: Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2014
    June 21 - 25, 2014
    BC, Vancouver, Canada

    Acceptance Rates

    DIS '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 107 of 402 submissions, 27%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,158 of 4,684 submissions, 25%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)133
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
    Reflects downloads up to 22 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Let Information Flow Into Awareness: A Design Space for Human-Like Experiences to Promote Informal Communication for Hybrid WorkProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661549(1666-1680)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Input Visualization: Collecting and Modifying Data with Visual RepresentationsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642808(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Luminate: Structured Generation and Exploration of Design Space with Large Language Models for Human-AI Co-CreationProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642400(1-26)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Designing Diverse Pathways for ParticipationProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642240(1-16)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Thematic Analysis of Self-Regulation Narratives in Textual Posts by Informal Programming Learners on Social Media2024 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC)10.1109/VL/HCC60511.2024.00033(223-235)Online publication date: 2-Sep-2024
    • (2024)An Electronic Engineering Approach for Turning a Lego Brick Piano into a Musical InstrumentIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.338636112(51319-51329)Online publication date: 2024
    • (2024)Space shaping in the design process for creative coding: a case study in media multiplicitiesDigital Creativity10.1080/14626268.2023.229944535:1(31-51)Online publication date: 5-Feb-2024
    • (2023)University Teachers’ Agency in Relation to Technology Use in Teaching: A Quantitative InvestigationEdutec. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa10.21556/edutec.2023.86.2915(40-61)Online publication date: 21-Dec-2023
    • (2023)Thermoplastic Kilnforms: Extending Glass Kilnforming Techniques to Thermoplastic Materials using Ontology-Driven DesignProceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3563657.3596027(263-281)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
    • (2023)De-Stijl: Facilitating Graphics Design with Interactive 2D Color Palette RecommendationProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581070(1-19)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media