Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
column

Don't mind the gap: a conceptual and psychometric analysis of the individual evaluation of discrepancies in the context of is user service satisfaction

Published: 03 March 2014 Publication History

Abstract

When researchers are interested in capturing perceived discrepancies--for example, the perceived alignment between organizational and business-unit strategies, or the perceived gap between expected and received service delivery--many different measurement approaches are available. This paper presents a psychometric analysis of the various measures available to capture perceived discrepancies or gaps. More specifically, a set of comparative survey-based measures, drawn from published research across various disciplines, including marketing, information systems, and organizational behavior, are examined for their applicability.

References

[1]
Bailey, J. E., & Pearson, S.W. (1983). Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction," Management Science, 29(5), 530--545.
[2]
Barbeau, J. B. (1985). Predictive and normative expectations in consumer satisfaction: A utilization of adaptation and comparison levels in a unified framework. In H. Hunt, & R. Day (Eds.), Conceptual and empirical contributions to consumer satisfaction and complaining behavior. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University School of Business, 27--32.
[3]
Baroudi, J. J., & Orlikowski, W. J. (1988). A short-form measure of user information satisfaction: A psychometric evaluation and notes on use, Journal of Management Information Systems, 4(4), 44--59.
[4]
Bhattacherjee A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model," MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351--370.
[5]
Bhattacherjee A., & Premkumar G. (2004). Understanding changes in belief and attitude toward information technology usage, MIS Quarterly, 28(2), 229--254.
[6]
Brown, T. J., Churchill, G. A., Jr., & Peter, J. P. (1993). Improving the measurement of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 69(Spring), 127--139.
[7]
Brown, S. A., Venkatesh, V. V., Kuruzovich, J., & Massey, A. P. (2008). Expectation confirmation: An examination of three competing models, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105, 52--66.
[8]
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (1999). Testing Factorial Invariance Across Groups: A Reconceptualization and Proposed New Method, Journal of Management, 25(1), 1--27.
[9]
Chin, W. W. (1998a). Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), pp. vii--xvi.
[10]
Chin, W. W. (1998b). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In George A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 295--336
[11]
Chin, W. W. (2010). How to Write Up and Report PLS Analyses. In V. E.Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler & H. Wang ( Eds.), Handbook of Partial Least Squares Concepts, Methods and Applications, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 650--690.
[12]
Chin, W. W., & Lee, M. K. O. (2000). A proposed model and measurement instrument for the formation of IS satisfaction: The case of end-user computing satisfaction. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Atlanta, GA, 553--563.
[13]
Chin, W. W., Peterson, R. A., Brown, S. P. (2008). Structural Equation Modeling in Marketing: Some Practical Reminders, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 16(4), 287--298.
[14]
Chin, W. W., Salisbury, W. D., Pearson, A. W., Stollak, M., J. (1999). Perceived Cohesion In Small Groups: Adapting And Testing The Perceived Cohesion Scale In A Small Group Setting. Small Group Research, 30(6), 751--766.
[15]
Chin, W. W., & Todd, P. A. (1995). On the use, usefulness and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research: A note of caution. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 237--246.
[16]
Dabholkar, P. A., Shephard C. D., & Thorpe, D. I. (2000). A comprehensive framework for service quality: An investigation of critical conceptual and measurement issues through a longitudinal study. Journal of Retailing, 76(2), 139--173.
[17]
DeLone, W., & McLean, E. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60--95.
[18]
Doll, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1988). The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction," MIS Quarterly, 12(2), 259--274.
[19]
Doll, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1991). The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction: theoretical and methodological issues. MIS Quarterly, 15(1), 5--1
[20]
Doll W., Xia W., & Torkzadeh, G. A. (1994). Confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument," MIS Quarterly, 18(4), 453--462.
[21]
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers: Fort Worth, TX.
[22]
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1998). Attitude structure and function. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, Vol.1 (4th ed.), Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 269--322.
[23]
Edwards, J. R. (1995). Alternatives to difference scores as dependent variables in the study of congruence in organizational research, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64, 307--324.
[24]
Edwards, J. R. (2001). Ten Difference Score Myths, Organizational Research Methods, 4(3), 265--287.
[25]
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39--50.
[26]
Gefen, D., Rigdon, E. E. & Straub, D. (2011). An Update and Extension to SEM Guidelines for Administrative and Social Science Research. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 35(2), pp. iii--xiv.
[27]
Goodhue, D. & Thompson, L. (1995). Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 19(2), 213--236.
[28]
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives, Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1--55.
[29]
Ives, B., Olson, M., & Baroudi, J. J. (1983). The measure of user information satisfaction. Communications of the ACM, 26(10), 785--793.
[30]
Khalifa, M., & Liu, V. (2003). Determinants of satisfaction at different adoption stages of internet-based services. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 4(5), 206--232.
[31]
MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130--149.
[32]
Oh, W., & Pinsonneault, A. (2007). On the assessment of the strategic value of information technologies: conceptual and analytical approaches. MIS Quarterly, 31(2), 239--265.
[33]
Oliver, R. L. (1981). Measurement and evaluation of satisfaction process in retail setting. Journal of Retailing, 57, 25--48.
[34]
Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decision. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 460--469.
[35]
Oliver, R. L. (1997). Satisfaction: A behavioral perspective on the consumer. New York: McGraw-Hill.
[36]
Olshavsky, R. N., & Spreng, R. A. (1989). A 'desires as standard' model of consumer satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 2, 49--54.
[37]
Olson, J. C., & Dover, P. (1979). Disconfirmation of consumer expectations through product trial. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(2), 179--189.
[38]
Santos, J., & Boote, J. (2003). A theoretical exploration and model of consumer expectations, post-purchase affective states and affective behaviour. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 3, 142--156.
[39]
Shaft, T. M., & Vessey, I. (2006). The role of cognitive fit in the relationship between software comprehension and modification. MIS Quarterly, 30(1), 29--55.
[40]
Spreng, R., MacKenzie, S. B., & Olshavsky, R. W. (1996). A re-examination of the determinants of consumer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing, 60(3), 15--32.
[41]
Spreng, R. A., & Page, T. J. (2001). The impact of confidence in expectations on consumer satisfaction. Psychology and Marketing, 18(11), 1187--1204.
[42]
Spreng, R. A., & Page, T. J. (2003). A test of alternative measures of disconfirmation. Decision Sciences, 34(1), 31--62.
[43]
Swan, J. E., & Trawick, I. F. (1980). Satisfaction related to predictive vs. desired expectations. In H. K. Hunt, & R. L. Day (Eds.), Refining concepts and measures of consumer satisfaction and complaining behavior. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University, 7--12.
[44]
Teas, R. K. (1993). Expectations, performance evaluation, and consumers. Journal of Marketing, 57, 18--34.
[45]
Tse, D. K., & Wilton, P. C. (1988). Models of consumer satisfaction formation: An extension. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(2), 204--212.
[46]
Tversky, A. (1969). Intransitivity of preferences. Psychological Review, 76, 31--48.
[47]
Venkatraman, N. (1989). The concept of fit in strategy research. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 423--444.
[48]
Wall, T. D., & Payne, R. (1973). Are deficiency scores deficient? Journal of Applied Psychology, 58(3), 322--326.
[49]
Werts, C. E., Linn, R. L., & Jöreskog, K. G. (1974). Interclass reliability estimates: Testing structural assumptions. Education and Psychological Measurement, 34, 25--33.
[50]
Westbrook, R. A., & M. D. Reilly (1983). Value-percept disparity: An alternative to the disconfirmation-of-expectations theory of consumer satisfaction. In R. Bagozzi and A. Tybout (Eds.), Advances in consumer research, Vol. 10. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 256--261.
[51]
Woodruff, R. B., Cadotte E. R., & Jenkins, R. L. (1983). Modeling consumer satisfaction processes using experience-based norms. Journal of Marketing Research, 20(August), 296--304.

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)Understanding adaptive information seeking in the context of microblogging from the cognitive switching perspectiveJournal of Librarianship and Information Science10.1177/096100062090915352:4(1237-1252)Online publication date: 12-Mar-2020

Index Terms

  1. Don't mind the gap: a conceptual and psychometric analysis of the individual evaluation of discrepancies in the context of is user service satisfaction

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems
    ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems  Volume 45, Issue 1
    February 2014
    45 pages
    ISSN:0095-0033
    EISSN:1532-0936
    DOI:10.1145/2591056
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 03 March 2014
    Published in SIGMIS Volume 45, Issue 1

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. is service satisfaction
    2. performance-perception gap
    3. psychometric measurement

    Qualifiers

    • Column
    • Research
    • Refereed

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 09 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2020)Understanding adaptive information seeking in the context of microblogging from the cognitive switching perspectiveJournal of Librarianship and Information Science10.1177/096100062090915352:4(1237-1252)Online publication date: 12-Mar-2020

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media