research-article

Comparing mouse and MAGIC pointing for moving target acquisition

Authors:

Jutta Hild,

Dennis Gill,

Jürgen BeyererAuthors Info & Claims

ETRA '14: Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications

Pages 131 - 134

https://doi.org/10.1145/2578153.2578172

Published: 26 March 2014 Publication History

Get Access

Abstract

Moving target acquisition is a challenging and manually stressful task if performed using an all-manual, pointer-based interaction technique like mouse interaction, especially if targets are small, move fast, and are visible on screen only for a limited time. The MAGIC pointing interaction approach combines the precision of manual, pointer-based interaction with the speed and little manual stress of eye pointing. In this contribution, a pilot study with twelve participants on moving target acquisition is presented using an abstract experimental task derived from a video analysis scenario. Mouse input, conservative MAGIC pointing and MAGIC button are compared considering acquisition time, error rate, and user satisfaction. Although none of the participants had used MAGIC pointing before, eight participants voted for MAGIC button being their favorite technique; participants performed with only slightly higher mean acquisition time and error rate than with the familiar mouse input. Conservative MAGIC pointing was preferred by three participants; however, mean acquisition time and error rate were significantly worse than with mouse input.

References

[1]

Al Hajri, A., Fels, S., Miller, G., and Ilich, M. 2011. Moving target selection in 2D graphical user interfaces. In Proceedings of Human-Computer Interaction--INTERACT 2011, Springer, 141--161.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[2]

Drewes, H., and Schmidt, M. 2009. The MAGIC touch: Combining MAGIC-pointing with a touch-sensitive mouse. In Proceedings of Human-Computer Interaction--INTERACT 2009, Springer, 415--428.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[3]

Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 411: Evaluation methods for the design of physical input devices, International Standard, International Organization for Standardization (2012) ISO, ISO/TS 9241-411

Google Scholar

[4]

Fares, R., Fang, S., and Komogortsev, O. 2013. Can We Beat the Mouse with MAGIC? In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 1387--1390.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[5]

Hasan, K., Grossman, T., and Irani, P. 2011. Comet and Target Ghost: Techniques for Selecting Moving Targets. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 839--848.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[6]

Hild, J., Müller, E., Klaus, E., Peinsipp-Byma, E., and Beyerer, J. 2013. Evaluating Multi-Modal Eye Gaze Interaction for Moving Object Selection. In Proceedings of the The Sixth International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, IARIA, 454--459.

Google Scholar

[7]

Isokoski, P., Joos, M., Spakov, O., and Martin, B. 2009. Gaze controlled games. Universal Access in the Information Society 8, 4, 323--337.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[8]

Jacob, R. J. K. 1991. The use of eye movements in human-computer interaction techniques: what you look at is what you get. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 9, 2, 152--169.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[9]

Ware, C., and Mikaelian, H. 1987. An evaluation of an eye tracker as a device for computer input2. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 17, SI, 183--187.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[10]

Zhai, S., Morimoto, C., and Ihde, S. 1999. Manual and gaze input cascaded (MAGIC) pointing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 246--253.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Zhang X(2021)An Evaluation of Eye-Foot Input for Target AcquisitionsUniversal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Design Methods and User Experience10.1007/978-3-030-78092-0_34(499-517)Online publication date: 24-Jul-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-030-78092-0_34
Hirzle TCordts MRukzio EBulling A(2020)A Survey of Digital Eye Strain in Gaze-Based Interactive SystemsACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications10.1145/3379155.3391313(1-12)Online publication date: 2-Jun-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3379155.3391313
Lankes MHaslinger AWolff C(2019)gEYEded: Subtle and Challenging Gaze-Based Player Guidance in Exploration GamesMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti30300613:3(61)Online publication date: 22-Aug-2019
https://doi.org/10.3390/mti3030061
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Comparing mouse and MAGIC pointing for moving target acquisition
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Interaction devices
      1. Touch screens

Recommendations

Gaze-based moving target acquisition in real-time full motion video
ETRA '16: Proceedings of the Ninth Biennial ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications

Real-time moving target acquisition in full motion video is a challenging task. Mouse input might fail if targets move fast, unpredictably, or are only visible for a short period of time. In this paper, we describe an experiment with expert video ...
Moving target acquisition by gaze pointing and button press using hand or foot
ETRA '16: Proceedings of the Ninth Biennial ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications

This work explores gaze-based interaction for moving target acquisition. In a pilot study, three interaction techniques are compared: gaze and manual button press (gaze + hand), gaze and foot button press (gaze + foot), and traditional mouse input. In a ...
Can we beat the mouse with MAGIC?
CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

MAGIC pointing techniques combine eye tracking with manual input. Since the mouse performs exceptionally well in a desktop setting, previous research on MAGIC pointing either resulted in minor improvements, or the techniques were applied to alternative ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

ETRA '14: Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications

March 2014

394 pages

ISBN:9781450327510

DOI:10.1145/2578153

Conference Chairs:
Pernilla Qvarfordt
FX Palo Alto Laboratory
,
Dan Witzner Hansen
IT University, Denmark

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 March 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

German Federal Ministry of Defense

Conference

ETRA '14

Sponsor:

ETRA '14: Eye Tracking Research and Applications

March 26 - 28, 2014

Florida, Safety Harbor

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 69 of 137 submissions, 50%

Upcoming Conference

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

6
Total Citations
View Citations
320
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)17
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

Reflects downloads up to 29 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Zhang X(2021)An Evaluation of Eye-Foot Input for Target AcquisitionsUniversal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Design Methods and User Experience10.1007/978-3-030-78092-0_34(499-517)Online publication date: 24-Jul-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-030-78092-0_34
Hirzle TCordts MRukzio EBulling A(2020)A Survey of Digital Eye Strain in Gaze-Based Interactive SystemsACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications10.1145/3379155.3391313(1-12)Online publication date: 2-Jun-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3379155.3391313
Lankes MHaslinger AWolff C(2019)gEYEded: Subtle and Challenging Gaze-Based Player Guidance in Exploration GamesMultimodal Technologies and Interaction10.3390/mti30300613:3(61)Online publication date: 22-Aug-2019
https://doi.org/10.3390/mti3030061
Velloso ECarter MNewn JEsteves AClarke CGellersen H(2017)Motion CorrelationACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/306493724:3(1-35)Online publication date: 28-Apr-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3064937
Balthasar SMartin MCamp FHild JBeyerer J(2016)Combining Low-Cost Eye Trackers for Dual Monitor Eye TrackingProceedings, Part II, of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Interaction Platforms and Techniques - Volume 973210.1007/978-3-319-39516-6_1(3-12)Online publication date: 17-Jul-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-319-39516-6_1
Kurauchi AFeng WMorimoto CBetke MMakedon FMariottini GKorn OMaglogiannis IMetsis V(2015)HMAGICProceedings of the 8th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments10.1145/2769493.2769550(1-4)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2769493.2769550

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Gaze-based moving target acquisition in real-time full motion video

Moving target acquisition by gaze pointing and button press using hand or foot

Can we beat the mouse with MAGIC?