Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2562059.2562137acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescpsweekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Abstraction, discretization, and robustness in temporal logic control of dynamical systems

Published: 15 April 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Abstraction-based, hierarchical approaches to control synthesis from temporal logic specifications for dynamical systems have gained increased popularity over the last decade. Yet various issues commonly encountered and extensively dealt with in control systems have not been adequately discussed in the context of temporal logic control of dynamical systems, such as inter-sample behaviors of a sampled-data system, effects of imperfect state measurements and un-modeled dynamics, and the use of time-discretized models to design controllers for continuous-time dynamical systems. We discuss these issues in this paper. The main motivation is to demonstrate the possibility of accounting for the mismatches between a continuous-time control system and its various types of abstract models used for control synthesis. We do this by incorporating additional robustness measures in the abstract models. Such robustness measures are gained at the price of either increased non-determinism in the abstracted models or relaxed versions of the specification being realized. Under a unified notion of abstraction, we provide concrete means of incorporating these robustness measures and establish results that demonstrate their effectiveness in dealing with the above mentioned issues.

References

[1]
R. Alur, T. A. Henzinger, O. Kupferman, and M. Y. Vardi. Alternating refinement relations. In Proc. International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR), pages 163--178, 1998.
[2]
D. Angeli. A Lyapunov approach to incremental stability properties. IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, 47(3):410--421, 2002.
[3]
G. E. Fainekos, A. Girard, H. Kress-Gazit, and G. J. Pappas. Temporal logic motion planning for dynamic robots. Automatica, 45:343--352, 2009.
[4]
G. E. Fainekos and G. J. Pappas. Robustness of temporal logic specifications for continuous-time signals. Theoretical Computer Science, 410(42):4262--4291, 2009.
[5]
G. F. Franklin, M. L. Workman, and D. Powell. Digital Control of Dynamic Systems. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., 1997.
[6]
A. Girard and G. Pappas. Approximation metrics for discrete and continuous systems. IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, 52:782--798, 2007.
[7]
S. Karaman and E. Frazzoli. Sampling-based algorithms for optimal motion planning with deterministic μ-calculus specifications. In Proc. of American Control Conference (ACC), pages 735--742, 2012.
[8]
M. Kloetzer and C. Belta. A fully automated framework for control of linear systems from temporal logic specifications. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control, 53:287--297, 2008.
[9]
H. Kress-Gazit, G. E. Fainekos, and G. J. Pappas. Temporal-logic-based reactive mission and motion planning. IEEE Trans. Robotics, 25:1370--1381, 2009.
[10]
D. Liberzon. Limited-information control of hybrid systems via reachable set propagation. In Proc. of the 16th International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control (HSCC), pages 11--20, 2013.
[11]
J. Liu, N. Ozay, U. Topcu, and R. Murray. Synthesis of reactive switching protocols from temporal logic specifications. IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, 58(7):1771--1785, 2013.
[12]
J. Liu, U. Topcu, N. Ozay, and R. M. Murray. Reactive controllers for differentially flat systems with temporal logic constraints. In Proc. of the 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), pages 7664--7670, 2012.
[13]
R. Majumdar, E. Render, and P. Tabuada. Robust discrete synthesis against unspecified disturbances. In Proc. of the 14th International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control (HSCC), pages 211--220, 2011.
[14]
O. Mickelin, N. Ozay, and R. M. Murray. Synthesis of correct-by-construction control protocols for hybrid systems using partial state information. In Proc. of American Control Conference (ACC), 2014.
[15]
S. Mouelhi, A. Girard, and G. Gössler. Cosyma: a tool for controller synthesis using multi-scale abstractions. In Proc. of the 16th International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control (HSCC), pages 83--88, 2013.
[16]
G. Orosz and S. P. Shah. A nonlinear modeling framework for autonomous cruise control. In Proc. of ASME Annual Dynamic Systems and Control Conference joint with JSME Motion & Vibration Conference, pages 467--471, 2012.
[17]
N. Ozay, J. Liu, P. Prabhakar, and R. M. Murray. Computing augmented finite transition systems to synthesize switching protocols for polynomial switched systems. In Proc. of American Control Conference (ACC), 2013.
[18]
G. Pola, P. Pepe, M. D. Di Benedetto, and P. Tabuada. Symbolic models for nonlinear time-delay systems using approximate bisimulations. Systems & Control Letters, 59(6):365--373, 2010.
[19]
G. Pola and P. Tabuada. Symbolic models for nonlinear control systems: Alternating approximate bisimulations. SIAM J. Control Optim., 48:719--733, 2009.
[20]
G. Reiszig. Computing abstractions of nonlinear systems. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control, 56:2583--2598, 2011.
[21]
P. Tabuada. Verification and Control of Hybrid Systems: A Symbolic Approach. Springer, 2009.
[22]
P. Tabuada and G. J. Pappas. Linear time logic control of discrete-time linear systems. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control, 51:1862--1877, 2006.
[23]
Y. Tazaki and J. Imura. Discrete abstractions of nonlinear systems based on error propagation analysis. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control, 57:550--564, 2012.
[24]
U. Topcu, N. Ozay, J. Liu, and R. M. Murray. On synthesizing robust discrete controllers under modeling uncertainty. In Proc. of the 15th ACM International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control (HSCC), pages 85--94, 2012.
[25]
E. M. Wolff and R. M. Murray. Optimal control of nonlinear systems with temporal logic specifications. In Proc. of the International Symposium on Robotics Research (ISRR), 2013.
[26]
T. Wongpiromsarn, U. Topcu, and R. M. Murray. Receding horizon temporal logic planning. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control, 57:2817--2830, 2012.
[27]
T. Wongpiromsarn, U. Topcu, N. Ozay, H. Xu, and R. M. Murray. TuLiP: a software toolbox for receding horizon temporal logic planning. In Proc. of the 14th International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control (HSCC), 2011.
[28]
M. Zamani, G. Pola, M. Mazo Jr, and P. Tabuada. Symbolic models for nonlinear control systems without stability assumptions. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control, 57:1804--1809, 2012.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Multi-behavioral Multi-Robot Systems driven by Motivation Dynamics2023 American Control Conference (ACC)10.23919/ACC55779.2023.10156084(1467-1472)Online publication date: 31-May-2023
  • (2022)Reactive task and motion planning for robust whole-body dynamic locomotion in constrained environmentsThe International Journal of Robotics Research10.1177/0278364922107771441:8(812-847)Online publication date: 25-May-2022
  • (2021)Leveraging Classification Metrics for Quantitative System-Level Analysis with Temporal Logic Specifications2021 60th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC)10.1109/CDC45484.2021.9683611(564-571)Online publication date: 14-Dec-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
HSCC '14: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Hybrid systems: computation and control
April 2014
328 pages
ISBN:9781450327329
DOI:10.1145/2562059
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 15 April 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. abstraction
  2. discretization
  3. hybrid control
  4. robustness
  5. temporal logic

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

HSCC'14
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

HSCC '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 29 of 69 submissions, 42%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 153 of 373 submissions, 41%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 20 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Multi-behavioral Multi-Robot Systems driven by Motivation Dynamics2023 American Control Conference (ACC)10.23919/ACC55779.2023.10156084(1467-1472)Online publication date: 31-May-2023
  • (2022)Reactive task and motion planning for robust whole-body dynamic locomotion in constrained environmentsThe International Journal of Robotics Research10.1177/0278364922107771441:8(812-847)Online publication date: 25-May-2022
  • (2021)Leveraging Classification Metrics for Quantitative System-Level Analysis with Temporal Logic Specifications2021 60th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC)10.1109/CDC45484.2021.9683611(564-571)Online publication date: 14-Dec-2021
  • (2021)Closed-loop incremental stability for efficient symbolic control of non-linear systemsIFAC-PapersOnLine10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.08.48554:5(121-126)Online publication date: 2021
  • (2021)Simulation Relations for Abstraction-based Robust Control of Hybrid Dynamical SystemsIFAC-PapersOnLine10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.08.48454:5(115-120)Online publication date: 2021
  • (2021)Closing the Gap Between Discrete Abstractions and Continuous Control: Completeness via Robustness and ControllabilityFormal Modeling and Analysis of Timed Systems10.1007/978-3-030-85037-1_5(67-83)Online publication date: 24-Aug-2021
  • (2021)Robustifying Controller Specifications of Cyber-Physical Systems Against Perceptual UncertaintyNASA Formal Methods10.1007/978-3-030-76384-8_13(198-213)Online publication date: 19-May-2021
  • (2020)BP-RRT: Barrier Pair Synthesis for Temporal Logic Motion Planning2020 59th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC)10.1109/CDC42340.2020.9304240(1404-1409)Online publication date: 14-Dec-2020
  • (2019)Facetal abstraction for non-linear dynamical systems based on δ-decidable SMTProceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control10.1145/3302504.3311793(99-108)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2019
  • (2019)Compositional Synthesis of Finite-State AbstractionsIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control10.1109/TAC.2018.286974064:6(2629-2636)Online publication date: Jun-2019
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media