research-article

Is autostereoscopy useful for handheld AR?

Authors:

Antonio KrügerAuthors Info & Claims

MUM '13: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia

Article No.: 4, Pages 1 - 4

https://doi.org/10.1145/2541831.2541851

Published: 02 December 2013 Publication History

Get Access

Abstract

Some recent mobile devices have autostereoscopic displays that enable users to perceive stereoscopic 3D without lenses or filters. This might be used to improve depth discrimination of objects overlaid to a camera viewfinder in augmented reality (AR). However, it is not known if autostereoscopy is useful in the viewing conditions typical to mobile AR. This paper investigates the use of autostereoscopic displays in an psychophysical experiment with twelve participants using a state-of-the-art commercial device. The main finding is that stereoscopy has a negligible if any effect on a small screen, even in favorable viewing conditions. Instead, the traditional depth cues, in particular object size, drive depth discrimination.

Supplementary Material

ZIP File (a4-kerber-suppl.zip)

Supplemental material.

Download
13.34 KB

References

[1]

N. Broy, F. Alt, S. Schneegass, N. Henze, and A. Schmidt. Perceiving layered information on 3D displays using binocular disparity. In Proc. PerDis, pages 61--66. ACM, 2013.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[2]

A. Dey, G. Jarvis, C. Sandor, and G. Reitmayr. Tablet versus phone: Depth perception in handheld augmented reality. In Proc. ISMAR, pages 187--196. IEEE, 2012.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[3]

J. Huhtala, M. Karukka, M. Salmimaa, and J. Häkkilä. Evaluating depth illusion as method of adding emphasis in autostereoscopic mobile displays. In Proc. MobileHCI, pages 357--360. ACM, 2011.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[4]

E. Kruijff, J. Swan, and S. Feiner. Perceptual issues in augmented reality revisited. In Proc. ISMAR, pages 3--12. IEEE, 2010.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[5]

M. Mikkola, A. Boev, and A. Gotchev. Relative importance of depth cues on portable autostereoscopic display. In Proc. workshop MoViD, pages 63--68. ACM, 2010.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[6]

P. Surman. Stereoscopic and autostereoscopic displays. In C. Zhu, Y. Zhao, L. Yu, and M. Tanimoto, editors, 3D-TV System with Depth-Image-Based Rendering, pages 375--411. Springer, 2013.

Google Scholar

[7]

M. M. Taylor and C. D. Creelman. PEST: Efficient estimates on probability functions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 41: 782--787, 1967.

Crossref

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Dey ABillinghurst MLindeman RSwan J(2018)A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014Frontiers in Robotics and AI10.3389/frobt.2018.000375Online publication date: 17-Apr-2018
https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00037
Rantakari JVäyrynen JColley AHäkkilä JLangheinrich MClinch S(2017)Exploring the design of stereoscopic 3D for multilevel mapsProceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays10.1145/3078810.3078829(1-6)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3078810.3078829
Park JSeo BPark J(2017)Binocular mobile augmented reality based on stereo camera trackingJournal of Real-Time Image Processing10.1007/s11554-016-0640-913:3(571-580)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s11554-016-0640-9
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Is autostereoscopy useful for handheld AR?
1. Computing methodologies
  1. Computer graphics
    1. Graphics systems and interfaces
      1. Virtual reality
2. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Interaction paradigms
      1. Mixed / augmented reality
      2. Virtual reality

Recommendations

Designing and Evaluating Interactions for Handheld AR
ISS Companion '23: Companion Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces

Mobile devices such as phones and tablets have become the most prevalent AR devices and are applied in various domains, including architecture, entertainment, and education. However, due to device-specific characteristics, designing and evaluating ...
Evaluating Menu Techniques for Handheld AR with a Smartphone & Mid-Air Pen
MobileHCI '20: 22nd International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services

Adding a mid-air pen to Handheld Augmented Reality creates a new kind of bimanual interaction for which many fundamental interaction design questions have not been answered yet. In particular, menus are an essential component in most visual interfaces, ...
3D Tabletop AR: A Comparison of Mid-Air, Touch and Touch+Mid-Air Interaction
AVI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces

This paper contributes a first comparative study of three techniques for selecting 3D objects anchored to the table in tabletop Augmented Reality (AR). The impetus for this study is that touch interaction makes more sense when the targeted objects are ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

MUM '13: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia

December 2013

333 pages

ISBN:9781450326483

DOI:10.1145/2541831

General Chairs:
Matthias Kranz
Universität Passau, Germany
,
Kåre Synnes
Luleå University of Technology, Sweden
,
Program Chairs:
Sebastian Boring
University of Copenhagen, Denmark
,
Kristof Van Laerhoven
TU Darmstadt, Germany

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 December 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

MUM '13

Sponsor:

Luleå Univ. of Techn.

MUM '13: 12th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia

December 2 - 5, 2013

Luleå, Sweden

Acceptance Rates

MUM '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 36 of 107 submissions, 34%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 190 of 465 submissions, 41%

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

8
Total Citations
View Citations
186
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)1
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 13 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Dey ABillinghurst MLindeman RSwan J(2018)A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Augmented Reality Usability Studies: 2005 to 2014Frontiers in Robotics and AI10.3389/frobt.2018.000375Online publication date: 17-Apr-2018
https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00037
Rantakari JVäyrynen JColley AHäkkilä JLangheinrich MClinch S(2017)Exploring the design of stereoscopic 3D for multilevel mapsProceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays10.1145/3078810.3078829(1-6)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3078810.3078829
Park JSeo BPark J(2017)Binocular mobile augmented reality based on stereo camera trackingJournal of Real-Time Image Processing10.1007/s11554-016-0640-913:3(571-580)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s11554-016-0640-9
Gombač LČopič Pucihar KKljun MCoulton PGrbac JKaye JDruin ALampe CMorris DHourcade J(2016)3D Virtual Tracing and Depth Perception Problem on Mobile ARProceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/2851581.2892412(1849-1856)Online publication date: 7-May-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2851581.2892412
Colley AHäkkilä JSchöning JDaiber FSteinicke FKrüger A(2015)Touch the 3rd Dimension! Understanding Stereoscopic 3D Touchscreen InteractionComputer-Human Interaction. Cognitive Effects of Spatial Interaction, Learning, and Ability10.1007/978-3-319-16940-8_3(47-67)Online publication date: 14-Apr-2015
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16940-8_3
Häkkilä JPosti MVentä-Olkkonen LKoskenranta OColley AZaslavsky ALoke SKulik LPitoura E(2014)Design, implementation and evaluation of an autostereoscopic 3D mobile phonebookProceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia10.1145/2677972.2677987(81-88)Online publication date: 25-Nov-2014
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2677972.2677987
Colley ARantakari JHäkkilä JBrush AFriday AKientz JScott JSong J(2014)Stereoscopic 3D mobile maps for indoor navigation in multi-level buildingsProceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct Publication10.1145/2638728.2638757(227-230)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2014
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2638728.2638757
Berning MKleinert DRiedel TBeigl M(2014)A study of depth perception in hand-held augmented reality using autostereoscopic displays2014 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR)10.1109/ISMAR.2014.6948413(93-98)Online publication date: Sep-2014
https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2014.6948413

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Abstract

Supplementary Material

References

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Designing and Evaluating Interactions for Handheld AR

Evaluating Menu Techniques for Handheld AR with a Smartphone & Mid-Air Pen

3D Tabletop AR: A Comparison of Mid-Air, Touch and Touch+Mid-Air Interaction

Comments

Information

Published In

Sponsors

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Publication History

Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Conference

Acceptance Rates

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

eReader

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media

Affiliations