Viewpoints-based software for management problem-solving interventions
Pages 275 - 279
References
[1]
Fran Ackermann and CoIin Eden. Visual interactive modelling : using multiple workstations for problem solving and action programmin g. Theory, method and science series : Working papers 95/S, University of Strathdyde, Department of Management Science, Glasgow, 1995.
[2]
D.E. Avison, P.A. Golder, and H.U. Shah. An SSM toolkit: Rich Picture diagr amming. Discussion Papers in Accounting & Management Science 91-23, Department of Accounting & Management Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, 1991.
[3]
Fidvio Buffa, Gilbert0 Marzano, and Maria Franca Norese. Macrame: A modeIIing methodology in multiactor contexts. Decision Support Systems, 7(4):331-343, August 1996.
[4]
Margaret M. Burnett, Marla 3. Baker, and Pieter van Zee. Scaling up visual programming languages. IEEE Computer, 28(3):45, March 1995.
[5]
P. B. Checkhmd. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. John Wiley & sons, Chiche&&, 1981.
[6]
G. DeSanctis andR. B. GaUupe. A foundations for group decision support system design. Management Science, 33:589- 609,1987.
[7]
Colin Eden. Using cognitive mapping for strategic options development and analysis (SODA). In JonathauRosenhead, editor, Rational analysis for a problematic world: problems sfrucluring methods for complezity, uncertainty, and conflict, chapter 2, pages 21-42. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 1989.
[8]
W. Emmerich, G. Spanoudakis, and Fink&tein A. Nextgeneration viewpoinbbased environments. In 7th European Workshop on Next Generation of CASE Tools, Heraklion,Greece, May 1996.
[9]
Jr. F. P. Brooks. No silver bull&. IEEE Computer, 20(4):10- 19, April 1987.
[10]
A. FinkeIstein, S. Easterbrook, J. Kramer, and B. Nuseibeh. Requirements engineering through Viewpoints. Technical report, Imperial College, Department of Computing, 180 Queen's Gate, London SW7 2BZ, 1992.
[11]
A. FinkeIstein, J. Kramer, and M. Goedicke. Viewpoint oriented software development. In Proc. of 3rd International Workshop Software Engineering d ils Applications (Cigref ECZ), pages 337-351, December 1990.
[12]
A. FinkeIstein, 3. Kramer, and B. Nuseibeh. A viewpointbased framework for software development environments. In IEE Colloquium on Architectures for Distributed Developmeni Support Environments, London, 1991. IEE. Digest No: 1991/162.
[13]
Roberts L. Flood. Solving Problem Solving: A Potent Ftirce for Efieclive Management. John Wiley & Sons, 1995.
[14]
M. Jarke, H. Nissen, and K. Pohl. Tool integration in evolving information system environments. NATURE report series NATURE&&l, LehrstuhI % Informatik V, RWTH Aachen, Ahomstr. 55, 52056 Aachen, Germany, 1994. Available by email to [email protected], or by ftp or WWW to ftp://ftp.informatik.rwthaachen.de/pub/packages/NATURE.
[15]
Paul Keys. A methodology for methodology choice. Systems Research, 5:65-76,198s.
[16]
S. Kuhn and MJ MuIler. Participatory Design - introduction. Communications of the ACM, 36(4):24-28, June 1993. Editorial.
[17]
Jintae Lee, Gregg Yost, and the PIF Working Group. The PIF Process Interchange Format and framework. Working Paper 180, MIT Sloan School of Management, Center for Coordination Science, MIT, USA, December 1994. Available on-line on http://ccs.mit.edu/lS94wp.htrnI.
[18]
he Massey and William A. Wallace. Understanding and facilitating group problem structuring and formulation: Mental representations, interaction and representation aids. Decision Support Systems, 7(4):253-274, August 1996.
[19]
Nikolay Mehandjiev. User Enhanceability for Information Systems through Visual Languages. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of HuII, HULL HU6 7RX, EngIand, 1996.
[20]
Nikolay Mehandjiev and Leonardo Bottaci. Userenhanceability for organizational information systems through visual programming. Tn Panos CoIlstantopouIos, Yannis VassiIiou, and John Mylopoulos, editors, Advanced Information Systems Engineering: 8th International Conference; proceedings / CAiSE'96, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, May 20-24, 1996, Lecture Notes in Computer Science No 1080, pages 432-456. Springer-&&g, 1996. ISBN 3-540- 61292-0.
[21]
Niiolay Mehandjiev, Leonardo Bottaci, and Roger Phillips. User enhanceabiity for fast response to changing office needs. In J. F. Nunamaker and R. H. Sprague, editors, Proceedings of the 27th Hawaii Inlernational Conference on Systems Sciences, pages 673-682, Vol IV. IEEE CS, IEEE CS Ppess, January 1994.
[22]
Nikolay Mehandjiev, Leonardo Bottaci, and Roger Phillips. User control over coordination mechanisms in office information systems. In St. Kim and G. O'Hare, editors, Cooperative Knowledge Processing: The Key Technology for Intelligent Organizations, Springer Series on Computer Supported Ce operative Work, chapter 5. Springer-Vex-lag, London, 1996. ISBN 3-540-19951-9.
[23]
Scott Douglas Meyers. Representing Software Systems in Multiple- View Development Environments. PhD thesis, Brown University, Department of Computer Science, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, USA, May 1993. Available as technical report CS-93-18.
[24]
GeraIdMidgley. Mixingmethods: DevelopingsyStemicintervention. Research Memorandum 9, The University of Hull, Centre for Systems Studies, HULL HU6 7RX, UK, 1995.
[25]
Gareth Morgan. Images of Organisalion. Sage Pbns, 1986.
[26]
Bonnie A. N.&i. A Small Matter of Programming: Perspectives on End User Computing. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 1993.
[27]
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersberg. Reference Model for Frameworks of Software Engineering Environments, draft version 1.5 edition, 1991.
[28]
Jonathan Rosenhead. Diverse unity : the principles and prospects of problem-structuring methods. In Jonathan Rosenhead, editor, Rational analysis for a problematic world : problems slructnring methods for complexity, uncertainty, and confIict chapter 14, pages 341-358. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 1989.
[29]
Ian Thomas and Brian A. Nejmen. Definition of tool integrationfor environments. IEEE Software, 9(2):29-35, March 1992.
Index Terms
- Viewpoints-based software for management problem-solving interventions
Recommendations
Embedable Problem-Solving Architectures: A Study of Integrating OPS5 with UMass GBB
The requirements of a problem-solving architecture that can be tightly embedded within other architectures and coexist with multiple instances of itself and of other problem-solvers are discussed. The additional effort needed to produce an embedable ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
October 1996
297 pages
ISBN:0897918673
DOI:10.1145/243327
Copyright © 1996 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 14 October 1996
Check for updates
Qualifiers
- Article
Conference
SOFT96
Sponsor:
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 299Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)17
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 29 Sep 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in