Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2494493.2494503acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesataccsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Modeling aircraft pushback trajectories for safe operations

Published: 28 May 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Pushback operations are safety critical as historic incident and accident data show. The consequences are severe injuries of the ground personnel and expensive aircraft damages. As such, pushback process optimization by means of precise tug/aircraft trajectory prediction is considered as valuable risk mitigation strategy. We present a mathematical model to predict these pushback trajectories under various geometric constellations which is a complex solver activity. Our proposed model relies on a kinematic approach to generate the pushback trajectory as a function of aircraft wheelbase and geometric angles for curved segments. The conclusive concept validation is based on commonly provided ICAO standard planning data and shows promising results which will be subject of further field validation tests.

References

[1]
Dieke-Meier, F., Fricke H. The need for a collision prevention system for the pushback of aircraft. In Proc. ICAS 2012, Brisbane, 2012.
[2]
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). Aircraft Accident and Incident Investigation. Annex 13 to the Convention on ICAO, 9th ed., ICAO, Montreal, 2004.
[3]
Dell G. Pushback accidents reviewed to identify causes and prevention. Flight Safety Foundation - Airport Operations, Vol. 20 (1994), no.3/4, 1--12.
[4]
Flight Safety Foundation. Communication from the pushback-tractor seat helps prevent serious injuries. Flight Safety Foundation, Vol. 30 (2004), no. 3, 1--4.
[5]
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control Systems (A-SMGCS) Manual, 1st ed., ICAO, Montreal, 2004.
[6]
Dieke-Meier, F., Fricke H. Expectations from a steering control transfer to cockpit crews for aircraft pushback. In Proc. ATACCS 2012, London, 2012.
[7]
Barnes, A. G., Yager, T. J. Enhancement of aircraft ground handling simulation capabilities. Neuilly sur Seine: AGARD, 1998.
[8]
Simoni, S. Development of a multi-physics model of a civil aircraft for ground manoeuvers using modelica. Universita di Pisa, 2006.
[9]
Bates, D., Hagström, M. Nonlinear Analysis and Synthesis Techniques for Aircraft Control. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2007.
[10]
Rankin, J., Coetzee, E., Krauskopf, B., Lowenberg, M. Bifurcation and Stability Analysis of Aircraft Turning on the Ground. Journal of guidance, control, and dynamics (2009), 500--511.
[11]
Coetzee, E., J., Krauskopf, B., Lowenberg, M., Nonlinear Aircraft Ground Dynamics. International Conference on Nonlinear Problems in Aviation and Aerospace (2006), 1--8.
[12]
Rankin, J. Bifurcation Analysis of Nonlinear Ground Handling of Aircraft. University of Bristol, 2010.
[13]
Fossum, T. V., Lewis, G. N. A Mathematical Model for Trailer-Truck Jackknifing. SIAM Review Vol. 23 (1981), no.1, 95--99.
[14]
Coetzee, E. Modelling and Nonlinear Analysis of Aircraft Ground Manoeuvres. University of Bristol (2011), 39--41.
[15]
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). Aerodrome Design Manual, Part 2 Taxiways, Aprons and Holding Bays. 4th ed., ICAO, Montreal, 2005.
[16]
Zöbel, D. Mathematical Modeling of the Kinematics of Vehicles. In: Hrubina, Kamil: Mathematical Modeling of Technical Processes. Socrates/Erasmus Summer School, Prevsov, Slovak Republic (2001), 178--200.
[17]
Bronstein, I. N., Semendjaew, K. A., Musiol, G., Muehlig, H. Taschenbuch der Mathematik. Frankfurt am Main, Verlag Harri Deutsch (2005), 1075.
[18]
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). Aerodromes, Volume I Aerodrome Design and Operations. Annex 14 to the Convention on ICAO, 5th ed., ICAO, Montreal, 2009

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Fixed Path Pull-In/Push Back Trajectories for Airliner Transport SystemAIAA Aviation 2019 Forum10.2514/6.2019-2935Online publication date: 14-Jun-2019
  • (2018)Effects of Pushback Accuracy On Static Apron Capacity2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference10.2514/6.2018-4241Online publication date: 24-Jun-2018

Index Terms

  1. Modeling aircraft pushback trajectories for safe operations

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ATACCS '13: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Application and Theory of Automation in Command and Control Systems
    May 2013
    160 pages
    ISBN:9781450322492
    DOI:10.1145/2494493
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    • HALA!: Higher Automation Levels in ATM
    • SESAR: Single European Sky ATM Research Joint Undertaking
    • Working Group 13.5: Human Error, Safety, and System Development: Working Group 13.5: Human Error, Safety, and System Development
    • The Boeing Company: The Boeing Company
    • Eurocontrol: Eurocontrol

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 28 May 2013

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. ground operations
    2. pushback
    3. pushback trajectory
    4. safety

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    ATACCS '13
    Sponsor:
    • HALA!
    • SESAR
    • Working Group 13.5: Human Error, Safety, and System Development
    • The Boeing Company
    • Eurocontrol

    Acceptance Rates

    ATACCS '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 14 of 42 submissions, 33%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 14 of 42 submissions, 33%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 22 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2019)Fixed Path Pull-In/Push Back Trajectories for Airliner Transport SystemAIAA Aviation 2019 Forum10.2514/6.2019-2935Online publication date: 14-Jun-2019
    • (2018)Effects of Pushback Accuracy On Static Apron Capacity2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference10.2514/6.2018-4241Online publication date: 24-Jun-2018

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media