Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2488388.2488516acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

MATRI: a multi-aspect and transitive trust inference model

Published: 13 May 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Trust inference, which is the mechanism to build new pair-wise trustworthiness relationship based on the existing ones, is a fundamental integral part in many real applications, e.g., e-commerce, social networks, peer-to-peer networks, etc. State-of-the-art trust inference approaches mainly employ the transitivity property of trust by propagating trust along connected users (a.k.a. trust propagation), but largely ignore other important properties, e.g., prior knowledge, multi-aspect, etc.
In this paper, we propose a multi-aspect trust inference model by exploring an equally important property of trust, i.e., the multi-aspect property. The heart of our method is to view the problem as a recommendation problem, and hence opens the door to the rich methodologies in the field of collaborative filtering. The proposed multi-aspect model directly characterizes multiple latent factors for each trustor and trustee from the locally-generated trust relationships. Moreover, we extend this model to incorporate the prior knowledge as well as trust propagation to further improve inference accuracy. We conduct extensive experimental evaluations on real data sets, which demonstrate that our method achieves significant improvement over several existing benchmark approaches. Overall, the proposed method (MaTrI) leads to 26.7% - 40.7% improvement over its best known competitors in prediction accuracy; and up to 7 orders of magnitude speedup with linear scalability.

References

[1]
R. Bell, Y. Koren, and C. Volinsky. Modeling relationships at multiple scales to improve accuracy of large recommender systems. In KDD, pages 95--104. ACM, 2007.
[2]
A. Buchanan and A. Fitzgibbon. Damped newton algorithms for matrix factorization with missing data. In CVPR, volume 2, pages 316--322, 2005.
[3]
C. Burnett, T. Norman, and K. Sycara. Bootstrapping trust evaluations through stereotypes. In AAMAS, pages 241--248, 2010.
[4]
D. Cartwright and F. Harary. Structural balance: a generalization of heider's theory. Psychological Review, 63(5):277--293, 1956.
[5]
K. Chiang, N. Natarajan, A. Tewari, and I. Dhillon. Exploiting longer cycles for link prediction in signed networks. In CIKM, pages 1157--1162, 2011.
[6]
D. Gefen. Reflections on the dimensions of trust and trustworthiness among online consumers. ACM SIGMIS Database, 33(3):38--53, 2002.
[7]
J. Golbeck. Trust and nuanced profile similarity in online social networks. ACM Transactions on the Web, 3(4):12, 2009.
[8]
R. Guha, R. Kumar, P. Raghavan, and A. Tomkins. Propagation of trust and distrust. In WWW, pages 403--412. ACM, 2004.
[9]
C.-W. Hang, Y. Wang, and M. P. Singh. Operators for propagating trust and their evaluation in social networks. In AAMAS, pages 1025--1032, 2009.
[10]
C. Hsieh, K. Chiang, and I. Dhillon. Low rank modeling of signed networks. In KDD, pages 507--515. ACM, 2012.
[11]
A. Jøsang and R. Ismail. The Beta reputation system. In Proc. of the 15th Bled Electronic Commerce Conference, volume 160, Bled, Slovenia, June 2002.
[12]
S. D. Kamvar, M. T. Schlosser, and H. Garcia-Molina. The Eigentrust algorithm for reputation management in p2p networks. In WWW, pages 640--651. ACM, 2003.
[13]
Y. Koren. Factorization meets the neighborhood: a multifaceted collaborative filtering model. In KDD, pages 426--434. ACM, 2008.
[14]
Y. Koren, R. Bell, and C. Volinsky. Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. Computer, 42(8):30--37, 2009.
[15]
U. Kuter and J. Golbeck. Sunny: A new algorithm for trust inference in social networks using probabilistic confidence models. In AAAI, pages 1377--1382, 2007.
[16]
J. Leskovec, D. Huttenlocher, and J. Kleinberg. Predicting positive and negative links in online social networks. In WWW, pages 641--650. ACM, 2010.
[17]
J. Leskovec, J. Kleinberg, and C. Faloutsos. Graphs over time: densification laws, shrinking diameters and possible explanations. In KDD, pages 177--187. ACM, 2005.
[18]
G. Liu, Y. Wang, and M. Orgun. Optimal social trust path selection in complex social networks. In AAAI, pages 1391--1398, 2010.
[19]
G. Liu, Y. Wang, and M. Orgun. Trust transitivity in complex social networks. In AAAI, pages 1222--1229, 2011.
[20]
X. Liu, A. Datta, K. Rzadca, and E. Lim. Stereotrust: a group based personalized trust model. In CIKM, pages 7--16. ACM, 2009.
[21]
H. Ma, M. Lyu, and I. King. Learning to recommend with trust and distrust relationships. In RecSys, pages 189--196. ACM, 2009.
[22]
P. Massa and P. Avesani. Controversial users demand local trust metrics: An experimental study on epinions. com community. In AAAI, pages 121--126, 2005.
[23]
A. Mishra and A. Bhattacharya. Finding the bias and prestige of nodes in networks based on trust scores. In WWW, pages 567--576. ACM, 2011.
[24]
V. Nguyen, E. Lim, J. Jiang, and A. Sun. To trust or not to trust? predicting online trusts using trust antecedent framework. In ICDM, pages 896--901. IEEE, 2009.
[25]
M. Richardson, R. Agrawal, and P. Domingos. Trust management for the Semantic Web. In ISWC, pages 351--368. Springer, 2003.
[26]
J. Sabater and C. Sierra. Reputation and social network analysis in multi-agent systems. In AAMAS, pages 475--482. ACM, 2002.
[27]
D. Sirdeshmukh, J. Singh, and B. Sabol. Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges. The Journal of Marketing, pages 15--37, 2002.
[28]
J. Tang, H. Gao, and H. Liu. mTrust: discerning multi-faceted trust in a connected world. In WSDM, pages 93--102. ACM, 2012.
[29]
J. Tang, H. Liu, H. Gao, and A. Das Sarmas. etrust: understanding trust evolution in an online world. In KDD, pages 253--261. ACM, 2012.
[30]
A. Tversky and D. Kahneman. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. science, 185(4157):1124--1131, 1974.
[31]
G. Wang and J. Wu. Multi-dimensional evidence-based trust management with multi-trusted paths. Future Generation Computer Systems, 27(5):529--538, 2011.
[32]
Y. Wang and M. P. Singh. Trust representation and aggregation in a distributed agent system. In AAAI, pages 1425--1430, 2006.
[33]
Y. Wang and M. P. Singh. Formal trust model for multiagent systems. In IJCAI, pages 1551--1556, 2007.
[34]
D. Watts and S. Strogatz. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature, 393(6684):440--442, 1998.
[35]
R. Xiang, J. Neville, and M. Rogati. Modeling relationship strength in online social networks. In WWW, pages 981--990. ACM, 2010.
[36]
L. Xiong and L. Liu. Peertrust: Supporting reputation-based trust for peer-to-peer electronic communities. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 16(7):843--857, 2004.
[37]
Y. Yao, H. Tong, F. Xu, and J. Lu. Subgraph extraction for trust inference in social networks. In ASONAM, pages 163--170, 2012.
[38]
Y. Yao, H. Tong, X. Yan, F. Xu, and J. Lu. Matrust: An effective multi-aspect trust inference model. arXiv preprint arXiv:1211.2041, 2012.
[39]
C. Ziegler and G. Lausen. Propagation models for trust and distrust in social networks. Information Systems Frontiers, 7(4):337--358, 2005.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)TrustGNN: Graph Neural Network-Based Trust Evaluation via Learnable Propagative and Composable NatureIEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems10.1109/TNNLS.2023.327563435:10(14205-14217)Online publication date: Oct-2024
  • (2024)Enhancing Worker Recruitment in Collaborative Mobile Crowdsourcing: A Graph Neural Network Trust Evaluation ApproachIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing10.1109/TMC.2024.337346923:10(10093-10110)Online publication date: Oct-2024
  • (2024)Adaptive Hypergraph Network for Trust Prediction2024 IEEE 40th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)10.1109/ICDE60146.2024.00232(2986-2999)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. MATRI: a multi-aspect and transitive trust inference model

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    WWW '13: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web
    May 2013
    1628 pages
    ISBN:9781450320351
    DOI:10.1145/2488388

    Sponsors

    • NICBR: Nucleo de Informatcao e Coordenacao do Ponto BR
    • CGIBR: Comite Gestor da Internet no Brazil

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 13 May 2013

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. latent factors
    2. multi-aspect property
    3. prior knowledge
    4. transitivity property
    5. trust inference

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    WWW '13
    Sponsor:
    • NICBR
    • CGIBR
    WWW '13: 22nd International World Wide Web Conference
    May 13 - 17, 2013
    Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    Acceptance Rates

    WWW '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 125 of 831 submissions, 15%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 12 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)TrustGNN: Graph Neural Network-Based Trust Evaluation via Learnable Propagative and Composable NatureIEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems10.1109/TNNLS.2023.327563435:10(14205-14217)Online publication date: Oct-2024
    • (2024)Enhancing Worker Recruitment in Collaborative Mobile Crowdsourcing: A Graph Neural Network Trust Evaluation ApproachIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing10.1109/TMC.2024.337346923:10(10093-10110)Online publication date: Oct-2024
    • (2024)Adaptive Hypergraph Network for Trust Prediction2024 IEEE 40th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)10.1109/ICDE60146.2024.00232(2986-2999)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
    • (2024)RTrust: toward robust trust evaluation framework for fake news detection in online social networksWorld Wide Web10.1007/s11280-024-01317-927:6Online publication date: 14-Nov-2024
    • (2023)KGTrust: Evaluating Trustworthiness of SIoT via Knowledge Enhanced Graph Neural NetworksProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202310.1145/3543507.3583549(727-736)Online publication date: 30-Apr-2023
    • (2023)DTrust: Toward Dynamic Trust Levels Assessment in Time-Varying Online Social NetworksIEEE INFOCOM 2023 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications10.1109/INFOCOM53939.2023.10228962(1-10)Online publication date: 17-May-2023
    • (2023)S-DeepTrust: A deep trust prediction method based on sentiment polarity perceptionInformation Sciences10.1016/j.ins.2023.03.065633(104-121)Online publication date: Jul-2023
    • (2022)User Trust Inference in Online Social Networks: A Message Passing PerspectiveApplied Sciences10.3390/app1210518612:10(5186)Online publication date: 20-May-2022
    • (2022)GATrust: A Multi-Aspect Graph Attention Network Model for Trust Assessment in OSNsIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2022.3174044(1-1)Online publication date: 2022
    • (2021)Relation Representation Learning via Signed Graph Mutual Information Maximization for Trust PredictionSymmetry10.3390/sym1301011513:1(115)Online publication date: 11-Jan-2021
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media