Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2481492.2481511acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Reading tweeting minds: real-time analysis of short text for computational social science

Published: 01 May 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Twitter status updates (tweets) have great potential for unobtrusive analysis of users' perceptions in real time, providing a way of investigating social patterns at scale. Here we present a tool that performs textual analysis of tweets mentioning a topic of interest and outputs words statistically associated with it in the form of word lists and word graphs. Such a tool could be of value for helping social scientists to navigate the overwhelming amounts of data that are produced on Twitter. To evaluate our tool, we select three concepts of interest to social scientists (i.e., privacy, serendipity, and Occupy Wall Street), build ground truths for each concept using the Grounded Theory approach, and perform a quantitative assessment based on two widely-used information retrieval metrics. To then offer qualitative assessments complementary to the quantitative ones, we run a user study involving 32 individuals. We find that simple information-theoretic association measures are more accurate than frequency-based measures. We also spell out under which conditions these metrics tend to work best.

References

[1]
J. M. Corbin. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage, 2008.
[2]
A. J. Gill, A. Vasalou, C. Papoutsi, and A. N. Joinson. Privacy dictionary: a linguistic taxonomy of privacy for content analysis. In Proc. CHI, 2011.
[3]
B. Hecht, L. Hong, B. Suh, and E. H. Chi. Tweets from Justin Bieber's heart: the dynamics of the location field in user profiles. In Proc. CHI, 2011.
[4]
D. Hopkins and G. King. A Method of Automated Nonparametric Content Analysis for Social Science. American Journal of Political Science, 54(1), 2010.
[5]
Lazer, D. et al. Computational Social Science. Science, February 2009.
[6]
G. Mark, M. Bagdouri, L. Palen, J. Martin, B. Al-Ani, and K. Anderson. Blogs as a collective war diary. In Proc. CSCW, 2012.
[7]
D. Quercia, D. Ó Séaghdha, and J. Crowcroft. Talk of the city: Our tweets, our community happiness. In Proc. ICWSM, 2012.
[8]
J. Rubin, V. L. Burkell and A. Quan-Haase. Facets of serendipity in everyday chance encounters: a grounded theory approach to blog analysis. Information Research, 16(3), 2011.

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Accelerating Real-Time Tracking Applications over Big Data Stream with Constrained SpaceDatabase Systems for Advanced Applications10.1007/978-3-030-18576-3_1(3-18)Online publication date: 24-Apr-2019
  • (2018)Improving Large-Scale Fingerprint-Based Queries in Distributed InfrastructureComputational Science – ICCS 201810.1007/978-3-319-93713-7_36(425-433)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2018

Index Terms

  1. Reading tweeting minds: real-time analysis of short text for computational social science

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    HT '13: Proceedings of the 24th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
    May 2013
    275 pages
    ISBN:9781450319676
    DOI:10.1145/2481492
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 May 2013

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. association measures
    2. concept extraction
    3. grounded theory approach
    4. linguistic evaluation

    Qualifiers

    • Short-paper

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    HT '13
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    HT '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 16 of 96 submissions, 17%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 378 of 1,158 submissions, 33%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 14 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2019)Accelerating Real-Time Tracking Applications over Big Data Stream with Constrained SpaceDatabase Systems for Advanced Applications10.1007/978-3-030-18576-3_1(3-18)Online publication date: 24-Apr-2019
    • (2018)Improving Large-Scale Fingerprint-Based Queries in Distributed InfrastructureComputational Science – ICCS 201810.1007/978-3-319-93713-7_36(425-433)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2018

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media