Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2470654.2466216acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Looking past yesterday's tomorrow: using futures studies methods to extend the research horizon

Published: 27 April 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Doing research is, in part, an act of foresight. Even though it is not explicit in many projects, we especially value research that is still relevant five, ten or more years after it is completed. However, published research in the field of interactive computing (and technology research in general) often lacks evidence of systematic thinking about the long-term impacts of current trends. For example, trends on an exponential curve change much more rapidly than intuition predicts. As a result, research may accidentally emphasize near-term thinking. When thinking about the future is approached systematically, we can critically examine multiple potential futures, expand the set of externalities under consideration, and address both negative and positive forecasts of the future. The field of Futures Studies provides methods that can support analysis of long-term trends, support the identification of new research areas and guide design and evaluation. We survey methods for futuristic thinking and discuss their relationship to Human Computer Interaction. Using the sustainability domain an example, we present a case study of a Futures Studies approach - the Delphi Method. We show how Futures Studies can be incorporated into Human Computer Interaction and highlight future work such as rethinking the role of externalities in the validation process.

References

[1]
Agre, P. E. Toward a critical technical practice: Lessons learned in trying to reform AI. In Bridging the Great Divide: Social Science, Technical Systems, and Cooperative Work, G. Bowker, et al., Ed. Erlbaum, 1997.
[2]
Agre, P. E. Real-time politics: The Internet and the political process. The Information Society 18, 5 (2002), 311--331.
[3]
Andersson, J. The future landscape. Technical Report 2008:5, Institute for Futures Studies, 2008.
[4]
Bardzell, J. Interaction criticism and aesthetics. In CHI (2009), 2357--2366.
[5]
Bell, G., and Dourish, P. Yesterday's tomorrows: notes on ubiquitous computing's dominant vision. PUC 11, 2 (2006), 133--143.
[6]
Bell, W. What do we mean by Futures Studies? In New Thinking for a New Millennium, R. Slaughter, Ed. Psychology Press, 1996, 3--25.
[7]
Bell, W. Foundations of Futures Studies: Human science for a new era: History, purposes and knowledge, vol. 1. Transaction Publishers, 2003.
[8]
Blevis, E. Sustainable interaction design: Invention & disposal, renewal & reuse. In CHI (2007), 503--512.
[9]
Blythe, M., and Wright, P. Pastiche scenarios: Fiction as a resource for user centred design. Interacting with Computers 18, 5 (2006), 1139--1164.
[10]
Carter, S., Mankoff, J., Klemmer, S. R., and Matthews, T. Exiting the cleanroom: On ecological validity and ubiquitous computing. HCI Journal 23, 1 (2008), 47--99.
[11]
Dator, J. From future workshops to envisioning alternative futures. Futures Research Quarterly 42 (1993), 298--319.
[12]
Dator, J. The future lies behind! Thirty years of teaching futures studies. American Behavioral Scientist 42 (1998), 298--319.
[13]
Davidoff, S., Lee, M. K., Dey, A. K., and Zimmerman, J. Rapidly exploring application design through speed dating. In Ubicomp (2007), 429--446.
[14]
Dourish, P., and Bell, G. "Resistance is Futile": Reading science fiction alongside ubiquitous computing. PUC (2008).
[15]
Dourish, P., and Bell, G. Divining a Digital Future: Mess and Mythology in Ubiquitous Computing. MIT Press, 2011.
[16]
Edwards, K., and Grinter, R. At home with ubiquitous computing: Seven challenges. In Ubicomp (2001), 256--272.
[17]
Feiner, S., Macintyre, B., and Seligman, D. Knowledge-based augmented reality. CACM 36, 7 (1993), 53--62.
[18]
Garreau, J. Radical Evolution: The Promise and Peril of Enhancing Our Minds, Our Bodies - and what it Means to be Human. Broadway, 2006.
[19]
Gianchandani, E. Calling for proposals: Envisioning frontiers of computing research. The Computing Community Consortium Blog, September 2011. Archived by WebCite (http://www.webcitation.org/6DdA6MheT).
[20]
Gibson, W. The science in science fiction, August 2012. Archived by WebCite (www.webcitation.org/69qsg0Nqh).
[21]
Gray, W. D., and Salzman, M. C. Damaged merchandise? a review of experiments that compare usability evaluation methods. HCI Journal 13, 3 (1998), 203--261.
[22]
Greenbaum, J., and King, M., Eds. Design at work: Cooperative design of computer systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1992.
[23]
Greenberg, S., and Buxton, B. Usability evaluation considered harmful (some of the time). In CHI (2008), 111--120.
[24]
Harber, R., Rodden, T., Rogers, Y., and Sellen, A. Being human: HCI in the year 2020. Tech. rep., Microsoft, 2008.
[25]
Hayles, N. K. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature and Informatics. University of Chicago Press, 1999.
[26]
Hendrickson, C. T., Lave, L., and Matthews, S. H. Environmental life cycle assessment of goods and services: An input-output approach. Tech. rep., Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, 2006.
[27]
Kirby, D. The future is now: Diegetic prototypes and the role of popular films in generating real-world technological development. Social Studies of Science 40, 1 (2010), 41--70.
[28]
Kreis, M. Pictures of the future in a digital world: An international comparison of user perspectives. Results of the third phase of the international study "Prospects and Opportunities of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) and Media", 2011.
[29]
Kurzweil, R. The Singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. Viking Adult, 2005.
[30]
Laurel, B. Computers as Theatre. Addison-Wesley, 1991.
[31]
Linston, H. A., and Turoff, M., Eds. The Delphi Method: Techniques and applications. H. A. Turoff and M. Linston, 2002.
[32]
Meadows, D. H. The limits to growth: A report for the Club of Rome's project on the predicament of mankind. Universe Books, 1972.
[33]
Miller, D. Stuff. Polity, 2009.
[34]
Moore, G. E. Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electronics Magazine 4 (1965).
[35]
Nathan, L. P., Friedman, B., Klasnja, P., Kane, S. K., and Miller, J. K. Envisioning systemic effects on persons and society throughout interactive system design. In DIS (2008), 1--10.
[36]
Nelson, H. G., and Stolterman, E. The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world. Educational Technology Publications, 2003.
[37]
Olsen, D. R. Evaluating user interface systems research. In UIST (2007), 251--258.
[38]
O'Neill, E., Lewis, D., and Conlan, O. A simulation-based approach to highly iterative prototyping of ubiquitous computing systems. In Simutools '09 (2009), Article No. 56.
[39]
Pearson, I. D. The next 20 years in technology: Timeline and commentary. The Futurist (January 2000).
[40]
Peirce, C. S. Pragmatism as the logic of abduction. In The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, 1893--1913, Pierce Edition Project, Ed. Indiana University Press, 1998.
[41]
Quist, J., and Vergragt, P. J. Backcasting for industrial transformations and system innovations towards sustainability: Relevance for governance? In the Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change, Governance for Industrial Transformation (2003), 409--437.
[42]
Rheingold, H. Smart mobs: The next social revolution. Basic Books, 2003.
[43]
Rittel, H. W. J., and Webber, M. M. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4 (1973), 155--169.
[44]
Rode, J. A. Reflexivity in digital anthropology. In CHI (2011), 123--132.
[45]
Rogers, Y. The changing face of Human-Computer Interaction in the age of ubiquitous computing. In USAB, vol. LNCS 5889 (2009), 1--19.
[46]
Rowe, G., and Wright, G. The delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis. International Journal of Forecasting 15 (1999), 353--375.
[47]
Schneider, S. H. Patient from hell: How I worked with my doctors to get the best of modern medicine and how you can to. Da Capo Lifelong Books, 2007.
[48]
Sellen, A. J., and Harper, R. R. The Myth of the Paperless Office. MIT Press, 2001.
[49]
Sengers, P., Boehner, K., David, S., and Kaye, J. Reflective design. In Critical Computing (2005), 49--58.
[50]
Sengers, P., and Gaver, B. Staying open to interpretation: Engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation. In DIS (2006), 99--108.
[51]
Spigel, L. Yesterday's future, tomorrow's home. Emergence 11, 1 (2001), 29--49.
[52]
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. In Judgement and Decision Making: An Interdisciplinary Reader, T. Connolly, H. R. Arkes, and K. R. Hammond, Eds. Cambridge University Press, 2000.
[53]
Wagener, W. A., and Sagaria, S. Misperception of exponential growth. Perception and Psychophysics 18, 6 (1975), 416--422.
[54]
Willard, W. Apocalypse When. Praxis, 2009.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Landscape and domains of possible future threats from a societal point of viewJournal of Contingencies and Crisis Management10.1111/1468-5973.1252932:1Online publication date: 7-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Perceptual model for semantic representation of design futures practice cases: Towards the development of a design futures repositoryFutures10.1016/j.futures.2024.103401161(103401)Online publication date: Aug-2024
  • (2024)Altered landscapes of a post‑carbon future: Visual response imaginaries as experiences of energy infrastructure in the Orkney IslandsEnergy Research & Social Science10.1016/j.erss.2024.103719117(103719)Online publication date: Nov-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Looking past yesterday's tomorrow: using futures studies methods to extend the research horizon

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 2013
    3550 pages
    ISBN:9781450318990
    DOI:10.1145/2470654
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 27 April 2013

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. futures studies
    2. sustainability

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CHI '13
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    CHI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 392 of 1,963 submissions, 20%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

    Upcoming Conference

    CHI '25
    CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 26 - May 1, 2025
    Yokohama , Japan

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)59
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10
    Reflects downloads up to 21 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Landscape and domains of possible future threats from a societal point of viewJournal of Contingencies and Crisis Management10.1111/1468-5973.1252932:1Online publication date: 7-Jan-2024
    • (2024)Perceptual model for semantic representation of design futures practice cases: Towards the development of a design futures repositoryFutures10.1016/j.futures.2024.103401161(103401)Online publication date: Aug-2024
    • (2024)Altered landscapes of a post‑carbon future: Visual response imaginaries as experiences of energy infrastructure in the Orkney IslandsEnergy Research & Social Science10.1016/j.erss.2024.103719117(103719)Online publication date: Nov-2024
    • (2024)“What could go wrong?”: An evaluation of ethical foresight analysis as a tool to identify problems of AI in librariesThe Journal of Academic Librarianship10.1016/j.acalib.2024.10294350:5(102943)Online publication date: Sep-2024
    • (2022)Towards Creative Version ControlProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35557566:CSCW2(1-25)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
    • (2022)Intimate Narratives: An Assets-Based Approach to Develop Holistic Perspectives of Student Mothers' Lives and Their Use of Technology in ParentingProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35556356:CSCW2(1-28)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
    • (2022)Impact of Annotator Demographics on Sentiment Dataset LabelingProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35556326:CSCW2(1-22)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
    • (2022)Hospitals of the Future: Designing Interactive Robotic Systems for Resilient Emergency DepartmentsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35555436:CSCW2(1-40)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
    • (2022)Esports Governance: An Analysis of Rule Enforcement in League of LegendsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35555416:CSCW2(1-28)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
    • (2022)Design Implications to Support Integrative Medicine in Pregnancy CareProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35555406:CSCW2(1-32)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media