Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2441776.2441840acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Globally distributed system developers: their trust expectations and processes

Published: 23 February 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Trust remains a challenge in globally distributed development teams. In order to investigate how trust plays out in this context, we conducted a qualitative study of 5 multi-national IT organizations. We interviewed 58 individuals across 10 countries and made two principal findings. First, study participants described trust in terms of their expectations of their colleagues. These expectations fell into one of three dimensions: that socially correct behavior will persist, that team members possess technical competency, and that individuals will demonstrate concern for others. Second, our study participants described trust as a dynamic process, with phases including formation, dissolution, adjustment and restoration. We provide new insights into these dimensions and phases of trust within distributed teams which extend existing literature. Our study also provides guidelines on effective practices within distributed teams in addition to providing implications for the extension of software engineering and collaboration tools.

References

[1]
Al-Ani, B., and Redmiles, D. In strangers we trust? Findings of an empirical study of distributed Development. In Proc. ICGSE 2009. IEEE Press (2009), 121--130.
[2]
Al-Ani, B., Trainer, E., Redmiles, D., and Simmons, E. Trust and surprise in distributed teams: Towards an understanding of expectations and adaptations. In Proc. ICIC 2012, ACM press (2012), 97--106.
[3]
Atlas.ti v. 6 {computer program}. ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH (2011).
[4]
Barber, B. The Logic and Limits of Trust. Rutgers University Press (1983).
[5]
Bos, N., Olson, J., Gergle, D., Olson, G., and Wright, Z. Effects of four computer-mediated communications channels on trust development. In Proc. CHI 2002. ACM Press (2002), 135--140.
[6]
Charmaz, K. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage (2006).
[7]
Corbin, J. M. and Strauss, A. L. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 3rd edition. Sage (2008).
[8]
Fulmer, C. Ashley and Gelfand, Michele Joy, Dynamic Trust Processes: Trust Dissolution and Restoration. In Proc. IACM 23rd Annual Conference, (2010).
[9]
Furst, S., Blackburn, R., and Rosen, B. Virtual team effectiveness: A proposed research agenda. Information Systems Journal 9 (1999), 249--269.
[10]
Glaser, B. G. Basics of grounded theory analysis. Sociology Press (1992).
[11]
Herbsleb, J. D., Mockus, A., Finholt, T. A., & Grinter, R. E. (2000). Distance, dependencies, and delay in a global collaboration Proceedings of the ACM 2000 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 319--328). New York: ACM Press.
[12]
Hosmer, L. T. Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. Academy of Management Review 20, 2 (1995), 379--403.
[13]
Jarvenpaa, S. L., Knoll, K., and Leidner, D. E. Is anybody out there?: antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 14, 4 (1998), 29--64.
[14]
Jarvenpaa, S. L., Shaw, T. R., and Staples, D. S. Toward contextualized theories of trust: The role of trust in global virtual teams. Information Systems Research 15, 3 (2004), 250--267.
[15]
March J. G., and Heath C. A primer on decision making: How decisions happen. Free Press (1994).
[16]
Olson, G. M., and Olson. J. S. Distance matters. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 15, 2 (2000), 139--178.
[17]
Palen, L., and Dourish, P. 2003. Unpacking "privacy" for a networked world. Conference on Human factors in computing systems, (CHI). ACM, NY, NY, 129--136.
[18]
Rocco, E. (1998). Trust breaks down in electronic contexts but can be repaired by some initial face-to-face contact CHI '98 Conference Proceedings ACM, NY, NY, (pp. 496--502). New York: ACM.
[19]
Sabherwal, R. The role of trust in outsourced IS development projects. Communications of the ACM 42, 2 (1999), 80--86.
[20]
Trainer, E. and Redmiles, D. F. "Foundations for the Design of Visualizations that Support Trust in Distributed Teams," In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI 2012, Capri Island, Italy), 34--41.
[21]
Tyler, J. R. and Tang, J. C. 2003. When Can I Expect an Email Response? A Study of Rhythms in Email Usage. Proceedings from ECSCW '03: European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 239--258.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Automatic Core-Developer Identification on GitHub: A Validation StudyACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology10.1145/359380332:6(1-29)Online publication date: 30-Sep-2023
  • (2023)Attribution-Based Personas in Virtual Software Engineering EducationProceedings of the 45th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training10.1109/ICSE-SEET58685.2023.00028(235-246)Online publication date: 17-May-2023
  • (2022)Towards dealing with commonly occurring requirements engineering process issues during software development outsourcingPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.026960717:7(e0269607)Online publication date: 14-Jul-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Globally distributed system developers: their trust expectations and processes

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '13: Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work
      February 2013
      1594 pages
      ISBN:9781450313315
      DOI:10.1145/2441776
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 23 February 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. empirical study
      2. globally distributed teams
      3. multi-national organizations
      4. systems development
      5. trust
      6. trust expectations
      7. trust processes

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      CSCW '13
      Sponsor:
      CSCW '13: Computer Supported Cooperative Work
      February 23 - 27, 2013
      Texas, San Antonio, USA

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '25

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)17
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 30 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2023)Automatic Core-Developer Identification on GitHub: A Validation StudyACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology10.1145/359380332:6(1-29)Online publication date: 30-Sep-2023
      • (2023)Attribution-Based Personas in Virtual Software Engineering EducationProceedings of the 45th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training10.1109/ICSE-SEET58685.2023.00028(235-246)Online publication date: 17-May-2023
      • (2022)Towards dealing with commonly occurring requirements engineering process issues during software development outsourcingPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.026960717:7(e0269607)Online publication date: 14-Jul-2022
      • (2022)Channeling End-User Creativity: Leveraging Live Streaming for Distributed Collaboration in Indie Game DevelopmentProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35551736:CSCW2(1-28)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
      • (2022)Distance Matters to Weak TiesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34928636:GROUP(1-26)Online publication date: 14-Jan-2022
      • (2022)Constructive Outline for Storming Strategies with Cloud (COSSWC)2022 Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Smart Energy (ICAIS)10.1109/ICAIS53314.2022.9742996(1156-1160)Online publication date: 23-Feb-2022
      • (2022)Empirically developed framework for building trust in distributed agile teamsInformation and Software Technology10.1016/j.infsof.2022.106828145:COnline publication date: 1-May-2022
      • (2021)How to Evaluate Trust in AI-Assisted Decision Making? A Survey of Empirical MethodologiesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34760685:CSCW2(1-39)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2021
      • (2021)Understanding and Reducing Perception Gaps with Mediated Social Cues when Building Workplace Relationships through CMCCompanion Publication of the 2021 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/3462204.3481800(303-306)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2021
      • (2021)A Tale of Creativity and StrugglesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34491505:CSCW1(1-27)Online publication date: 22-Apr-2021
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media