Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2396761.2398526acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Customizing search results for non-native speakers

Published: 29 October 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Blog posts, news articles and other webpages are present on the web in multiple languages. Standard search engines evaluate the relevance of the candidate documents to the given query. However, when considering documents with overlapping content, many of them written in a foreign language other than the user's own native tongue, it is beneficial to promote documents that are easy enough for the user to read. Here, we show how to rank a collection of foreign documents based on both: a) relevance to the query, and b) the comprehension difficulty of the document. We design effective ranking operators that evaluate the difficulty of a foreign document with respect to the user's native language. We show that existing search engines can easily augment their scoring function by incorporating the proposed comprehensibility metrics. Finally, we provide extensive experimental evidence that the comprehensibility-aware ranking model significantly improves the standard relevance-based ranking paradigm.

References

[1]
T. Bell. Extensive reading: speed and comprehension. In The Reading Matrix, 1(1), 2001.
[2]
T. Brants, A. Popat, P. Xu, F. Och, and J. Dean. Large language models in machine translation. In Proc. of EMNLP-CoNLL, 2007.
[3]
J. Chall and E. Dale. Readability revisited: The New Dale-Chall Readability Formula. Brookline Books, 1995.
[4]
K. Collins-Thompson and J. Callan. Predicting reading difficulty with statistical language models. In JASIST '05.
[5]
K. Collins-Thompson and J. Callan. A language modeling approach to predicting reading difficulty. In Proc. of HLT/NAACL, 2004.
[6]
W. DuBay. The principles of readability. In Impact Information, 2004.
[7]
R. Flesch. A new readability yardstick. In J Appl Psychol 32, pages 221--224, 1948.
[8]
B. M. Friel and S. M. Kennison. Identifying German-English cognates, false cognates, and non-cognates: methodological issues and descriptive norms. In Bilingualism: Language and Cognition '01.
[9]
M. Heilman, K. Collins-Thompson, and M. Eskenazi. An analysis of statistical models and features for reading difficulty prediction. In Proc. of Workshop on innovative Use of NLP For Building Educational Applications, pages 71--79, 2008.
[10]
J. Kincaid, R. Fishburne, R. Rogers, and B. Chissom. Derivation of new readability formulas for navy enlisted personnel. In Research Branch Report 8--75, Millington, TN: Naval Technical Training, 1975.
[11]
C. Lennon and H. Burdick. The lexile framework as an approach for reading measurement and success. 2004.
[12]
N. Ott. Information retrieval for language learning: An exploration of text difficulty measures. In Master's Thesis in Computational Linguistics, Universität Tübingen, 2009.
[13]
S. E. Petersen. Natural language processing tools for reading level assessment and text simplification for bilingual education. In Doctoral Thesis, University of Washington, 2007.
[14]
S. E. Petersen and M. Ostendorf. A machine learning approach to reading level assessment. In CSL, pages 89--106, 2009.
[15]
E. Pitler and A. Nenkova. Revisiting readability: a unified framework for predicting text quality. In EMNLP '08.
[16]
A. Schiller. German compound analysis with wfsc. In Finite-State Methods and Natural Language Processing, 2006.
[17]
S. Schulz, K. Markó, E. Sbrissia, P. Nohama, and U. Hahn. Cognate mapping - a heuristic strategy for the semi-supervised acquisition of a spanish lexicon from a portuguese seed lexicon. In COLING '04.
[18]
L. A. Sherman. Analytics Of Literature: A Manual For The Objective Study Of English Prose And Poetry. Ginn and Company, 1893.
[19]
A. Stenner. Measuring reading comprehension with the lexile framework. In American Conf. on Adolescent/Adult Literacy, 1996.

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)As We May StudyProceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3173574.3173912(1-12)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2018

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CIKM '12: Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management
October 2012
2840 pages
ISBN:9781450311564
DOI:10.1145/2396761
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 29 October 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. document comprehensibility
  2. multilingual document search

Qualifiers

  • Short-paper

Conference

CIKM'12
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,861 of 8,427 submissions, 22%

Upcoming Conference

CIKM '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 13 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)As We May StudyProceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3173574.3173912(1-12)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2018

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media