Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2381716.2381852acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescubeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Modeling transparency and collaborativeness in distributed work groups

Published: 03 September 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Transparency and collaborativeness are two essential features required for dependability. These two issues in social groups are not well studied. The present paper studies these two aspects in distributed work group environment such as Self Help Groups [SHGs]. There were several thousands of SHGs spread geographically all over India [about 3.367 million SHGs as of April 2011]. Automation of SHG was not proposed by any research work. This paper attempts to provide a rudimentary framework for transparency and collaborativeness in SHGs upon which holistic models can be developed in future.

References

[1]
A B Sagar, People, SHGs and Social Values: A Formal Framework, Special Issue of IJCCT, Vol-2, Issue-5. 2010.
[2]
A B Sagar, Transparency Computation for Work Groups, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2012, Volume 7154, Distributed Computing and Internet Technology, Pages 265--266, 2011
[3]
G. Smith and R. Davis, Frameworks for Cooperation in Distributed environment, presented at Transaction on Systems Man and Cybernetics, 1981.
[4]
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/15.04/wired40.html
[5]
Vaccaro, A., Madsen P., ICT, Non Governmental Organizations and Transparency: Ethical Concerns and Perspectives, Proceedings of CEPE, 2007.
[6]
Hess, D. Social reporting and new governance regulation: The prospects of achieving corporate accountability through transparency. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(3), 453--476.(2007)
[7]
Williams, C. C. Trust diffusion: The effect of interpersonal trust on structure, function, and organizational transparency. Business & Society, 44(3), 357--368. (2005)
[8]
Danny Weyns, Tom Holvoet, Synchronous versus Asynchronous Collaboration in Situated Multi-agent Systems AAMAS'03, July 14 - 18, 2003, ACM.
[9]
Sarosh N. Talukdar, Collaboration rules for autonomous software agents, Decision Support Systems 24 (1999) 269--278
[10]
Karen D. Grant, Dimensions of Collaborative Work, Human Computer Interaction Consortium 2001, Colorado, Feb. 7 - 11, 2001.
[11]
Ebrahim AlHashel, A Conceptual Agent Cooperation Model for Multi-agent Systems' Team Formation Process, Proceeding ICCIT '08 Proceedings of the 2008 Third International Conference on Convergence and Hybrid Information Technology - Volume 01 Pages 12 - 20 ISBN: 978-0-7695-3407-7.
[12]
D. Ouelhadj, S. Petrovic, P. I. Cowling, A. Meisels, Inter - agent cooperation and communication for agent-based robust dynamic scheduling in steel production, 2001.
[13]
BenDor Todd, Scheffran Jörgen, Hannon Bruce.Elsevier, Ecological and economic sustainability in fishery management: A multi-agent model for understanding competition and cooperation, vol. 68(4), pages 1061 - 1073, February 2009.
[14]
Zhigang Huang, Pengyi Gao, Yan He, Qing He, Multi-Agent Cooperation Based on Interest Group, International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering (CiSE '09), 2009,
[15]
Florian Zach, & Pradeep Racherla, Assessing the Value of Collaborations in Tourism Networks: A Case Study of Elkhart County, Indiana, Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 28:1, 97--110.
[16]
Wen-Yau Lianga, Chun-Che Huang, The agent - based collaboration information system of product development, International Journal of Information Management, Volume 22, Issue 3, June 2002, Pages 211--224.
[17]
Økland Andreas, Lillebo Børge, Amdahl Eva, Seim Andreas, A Framework for Transparency, USAID, CARE, GTZ/NABARD. 21st Annual Conference of the Production and Operation Management Society, Vancouver, Canada, May 07, 2010 - May 10, 2010.
[18]
Antonino Vaccaro ÆPeter Madsen, Corporate dynamic transparency: the new ICT-driven ethics?, Ethics Inf Technol (2009) 11:113--122.
[19]
Tapscott, D., & Ticoll, D. The naked corporation, New York:Free Press. (2003)
[20]
University of Paisley Transaction Model, Network and Information Systems Management, University of Paisley (2000).
[21]
Peter Madsen, Dynamic Transparency, Prudential Justice, and Corporate Transformation: Becoming Socially Responsible in the Internet Age Journal of Business Ethics (2009) 90:639--648, Springer 2010.
[22]
Antonino Vaccaro Peter Madsen, Transparency in business and society: introduction to the special issue, Ethics Inf Technol (2009) 11:101--103.
[23]
Tapan Parikh, Rural Microfinance Service Delivery: Gaps, Inefficiencies and Emerging Solutions, 2007
[24]
http://www.indiastat.com/table/socialandwelfareschemes/27/physicalprogressundersampoornagrameenrozgaryojanasgry/449702/446706/data.aspx

Index Terms

  1. Modeling transparency and collaborativeness in distributed work groups

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    CUBE '12: Proceedings of the CUBE International Information Technology Conference
    September 2012
    879 pages
    ISBN:9781450311854
    DOI:10.1145/2381716
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    • CUOT: Curtin University of Technology

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 03 September 2012

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. SHG
    2. collaboration
    3. distributed work groups
    4. self help group
    5. transparency

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CUBE '12
    Sponsor:
    • CUOT

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 88
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 17 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media