Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2365952.2365961acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesrecsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Multiple objective optimization in recommender systems

Published: 09 September 2012 Publication History

Abstract

We address the problem of optimizing recommender systems for multiple relevance objectives that are not necessarily aligned. Specifically, given a recommender system that optimizes for one aspect of relevance, semantic matching (as defined by any notion of similarity between source and target of recommendation; usually trained on CTR), we want to enhance the system with additional relevance signals that will increase the utility of the recommender system, but that may simultaneously sacrifice the quality of the semantic match. The issue is that semantic matching is only one relevance aspect of the utility function that drives the recommender system, albeit a significant aspect. In talent recommendation systems, job posters want candidates who are a good match to the job posted, but also prefer those candidates to be open to new opportunities. Recommender systems that recommend discussion groups must ensure that the groups are relevant to the users' interests, but also need to favor active groups over inactive ones. We refer to these additional relevance signals (job-seeking intent and group activity) as extraneous features, and they account for aspects of the utility function that are not captured by the semantic match (i.e. post-CTR down-stream utilities that reflect engagement: time spent reading, sharing, commenting, etc). We want to include these extraneous features into the recommendations, but we want to do so while satisfying the following requirements: 1) we do not want to drastically sacrifice the quality of the semantic match, and 2) we want to quantify exactly how the semantic match would be affected as we control the different aspects of the utility function. In this paper, we present an approach that satisfies these requirements.
We frame our approach as a general constrained optimization problem and suggest ways in which it can be solved efficiently by drawing from recent research on optimizing non-smooth rank metrics for information retrieval. Our approach features the following characteristics: 1) it is model and feature agnostic, 2) it does not require additional labeled training data to be collected, and 3) it can be easily incorporated into an existing model as an additional stage in the computation pipeline. We validate our approach in a revenue-generating recommender system that ranks billions of candidate recommendations on a daily basis and show that a significant improvement in the utility of the recommender system can be achieved with an acceptable and predictable degradation in the semantic match quality of the recommendations.

References

[1]
D. Agarwal, B.-C. Chen, P. Elango, and X. Wang. Click shaping to optimize multiple objectives. In KDD, 2011.
[2]
S.-H. Cha. Comprehensive survey on distance/similarity measures between probability density functions. International Journal of Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 2007.
[3]
O. Chapelle and M. Wu. Gradient descent optimization of smoothed information retrieval metrics. Information Retrieval Journal, June 2010.
[4]
E. C. Fieller. Some problems in interval estimation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1954.
[5]
T. Jambor and J. Wang. Optimizing multiple objectives in collaborative filtering. In RecSys, 2010.
[6]
Y. Jin and B. Sendhoff. Pareto-based multiobjective machine learning: An overview and case studies. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 2008.
[7]
C. Kang, X. Wang, Y. Chang, and B. Tseng. Learning to rank with multi-aspect relevance for vertical search. In WSDM, 2012.
[8]
K. M. Svore, M. N. Volkovs, and C. J. Burges. Learning to rank with multiple objective functions. In WWW, 2011.
[9]
M. J. Taylor, J. Guiver, S. Robertson, and T. Minka. Softrank: optimizing non-smooth rank metrics. In WSDM, 2008.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The Power of Linear Programming in Sponsored Listings Ranking: Evidence from Field ExperimentsSSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.4767661Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)Calibrating the Predictions for Top-N RecommendationsProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems10.1145/3640457.3688177(963-968)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Positive-Sum Impact of Multistakeholder Recommender Systems for Urban Tourism Promotion and User UtilityProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems10.1145/3640457.3688173(939-944)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
RecSys '12: Proceedings of the sixth ACM conference on Recommender systems
September 2012
376 pages
ISBN:9781450312707
DOI:10.1145/2365952
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 09 September 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. multiple objective optimization
  2. recommender systems

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

RecSys '12
Sponsor:
RecSys '12: Sixth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
September 9 - 13, 2012
Dublin, Ireland

Acceptance Rates

RecSys '12 Paper Acceptance Rate 24 of 119 submissions, 20%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 254 of 1,295 submissions, 20%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)114
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)15
Reflects downloads up to 14 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The Power of Linear Programming in Sponsored Listings Ranking: Evidence from Field ExperimentsSSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.4767661Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)Calibrating the Predictions for Top-N RecommendationsProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems10.1145/3640457.3688177(963-968)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Positive-Sum Impact of Multistakeholder Recommender Systems for Urban Tourism Promotion and User UtilityProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems10.1145/3640457.3688173(939-944)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Pareto Front Approximation for Multi-Objective Session-Based Recommender SystemsProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems10.1145/3640457.3688048(809-812)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Towards Sustainable Recommendations in Urban TourismProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems10.1145/3640457.3688016(1330-1334)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Optimizing Novelty of Top-k Recommendations using Large Language Models and Reinforcement LearningProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining10.1145/3637528.3671618(5669-5679)Online publication date: 25-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Multi-objective Learning to Rank by Model DistillationProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining10.1145/3637528.3671597(5783-5792)Online publication date: 25-Aug-2024
  • (2024)A Multi-Population Based Evolutionary Algorithm for Many-Objective RecommendationsIEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence10.1109/TETCI.2024.33590938:2(1969-1982)Online publication date: Apr-2024
  • (2024)Not Just Algorithms: Strategically Addressing Consumer Impacts in Information RetrievalAdvances in Information Retrieval10.1007/978-3-031-56066-8_25(314-335)Online publication date: 24-Mar-2024
  • (2023)A survey on multi-objective recommender systemsFrontiers in Big Data10.3389/fdata.2023.11578996Online publication date: 22-Mar-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media