Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2347504.2347568acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdppiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Integrating end-users to the design process through design competitions

Published: 22 June 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Design competitions has been one of the major tools for institutions and companies to procure design for more than a millennia, however with the arrival of internet and with the rapid development of information and communication technologies today, much more can be done. This paper discusses how, and in which way design competitions could be utilized for integrating end-users to the design process.

References

[1]
Schuler, D, & Namioka, A. (1993). Participatory design: principles and practices. New York: CRC Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[2]
M., J, & Baber, C. (1999). User-centered design of systems. London: Springer Verlag.
[3]
Theodoridis, S, & Koutroumbas, K. (2006). Pattern recognition. San Diego: Academic Press.
[4]
Schwarze, S. (1996). Configuration of multiple-variant products. Zurich: Vdf Hochschulverlag AG.
[5]
Fandel, G. (2004). Modern concepts of the theory of the firm: managing enterprises of the new economy. Berlin: Springer.
[6]
Forman, G. 2003. An extensive empirical study of feature selection metrics for text classification. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3 (Mar. 2003), 1289--1305.
[7]
Bell, S. (2006). Lean enterprise systems: using it for continuous improvement. New Jersey: Wiley-Interscience.
[8]
Goffin, K, & Lemke, F. (2010). Identifying hidden needs: creating breakthrough products. Great Britain: Palgrave MacMillan.
[9]
Gorchels, L. (2003). The product manager's field guide: practical tools, exercises, and resources for improved product management. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional.
[10]
Aron M. Levin, J. Charlene Davis, Irwin Levin (1996), Theoretical And Empirical Linkages Between Consumers' Responses To Different Branding Strategies, Advances in Consumer Research Volume 23, eds. Kim P. Corfman and John G. Lynch Jr., Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, http://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/display.asp?id=7966, retrieved 15.02.2011.
[11]
M., R, J., F, P., M, M., J, & Singer, E. (2009). Survey methodology. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
[12]
Tideman, N. (2006). Collective decisions and voting: the potential for public choice. Burlington: Ashgate Pub Co.
[13]
Cobanli, O. (2011). Original Research on Design Competitions: Statistics and Key Figures. http://designcompetition.com/statistics.php, retrieved 15.02.2011

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Semantic configuration model with natural transformationsCognitive Systems Research10.1016/j.cogsys.2023.10118583:COnline publication date: 4-Mar-2024
  • (2023)How Transgender People and Communities Were Involved in Trans Technology Design ProcessesProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580972(1-16)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
DPPI '11: Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces
June 2011
492 pages
ISBN:9781450312806
DOI:10.1145/2347504
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 June 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. configurator
  2. crowd-sourcing
  3. design competition
  4. design contests
  5. end-user integration
  6. participatory design
  7. trend analysis

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

DPPI '11

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 27 of 53 submissions, 51%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 25 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Semantic configuration model with natural transformationsCognitive Systems Research10.1016/j.cogsys.2023.10118583:COnline publication date: 4-Mar-2024
  • (2023)How Transgender People and Communities Were Involved in Trans Technology Design ProcessesProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580972(1-16)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media