Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2207676.2208413acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Designing a debugging interaction language for cognitive modelers: an initial case study in natural programming plus

Published: 05 May 2012 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate how a debugging environment should support a population doing work at the core of HCI research: cognitive modelers. In conducting this investigation, we extended the Natural Programming methodology (a user-centered design method for HCI researchers of programming environments), to add an explicit method for mapping the outcomes of NP's empirical investigations to a language design. This provided us with a concrete way to make the design leap from empirical assessment of users' needs to a language. The contributions of our work are therefore: (1) empirical evidence about the content and sequence of cognitive modelers' information needs when debugging, (2) a new, empirically derived, design specification for a debugging interaction language for cognitive modelers, and (3) an initial case study of our "Natural Programming Plus" methodology.

References

[1]
Anderson, J., Boyle, C. Corbett, A., and Lewis, M. Cognitive modeling and intelligent tutoring, In Artificial Intelligence and Learning Environments, W. Clancey and E. Soloway, (Eds.). MIT Press (1990), 7--49.
[2]
Bates, M. Where should the person stop and the information search interface start? Information Processing and Management, 26:5, (1990), 575--591.
[3]
Bogart, C., Burnett, M., Douglass, S., Piorkowski, D., Shinsel, A. Does my model work? Evaluation abstractions of cognitive modelers. Proc. VLHCC, IEEE (2010), 49--56.
[4]
Bothell, D. et al., ACT-R Tutorial. Distributed with ACT-R 6.0 version 1.3 r766. http://actr.psy.cmu.edu/actr6/. Retrieved August, 2009.
[5]
Douglass, S., Mittal, S., Using domain specific languages to improve scale and integration of cognitive models, Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation, (2011).
[6]
Fu, W. and Pirolli, P. SNIF-ACT: A cognitive model of user navigation on the world wide web. HumanComputer Interaction, 22:4 (2007), 355--412
[7]
Green, T. and Petre, M. Usability Analysis of Visual Programming Environments: A "Cognitive Dimensions" Framework. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 7:2 (1996), 131--174.
[8]
John, B. and Kieras, D. The GOMS family of user interface analysis techniques: comparison and contrast. ACM TOCHI 3:4 (1996), 320--351.
[9]
Ko, A., Myers, B. A framework and methodology for studying the causes of software errors in programming systems. J. Vis. Langs. & Computing, 16 (2005), 41--84.
[10]
Ko, A., DeLine, R. and Venolia, G. Information needs in collocated software development teams. Proc. ICSE, ACM (2007) 344--353.
[11]
Ko A., Myers, B. Finding causes of program output with the Java Whyline. Proc. CHI, ACM (2009), 1569--1578.
[12]
Little, G., Miller, R., Chou, V., Bernstein, M., Lau, T. and Cypher, A., Sloppy programming, In No Code Required, Cypher, A., Dontcheva, M., Lau, T. and Nichols, J. (Eds.). Morgan Kaufmann (2010), 289--307.
[13]
Myers, B., Weitzman, D., Ko, A., Chau, D. Answering why and why not questions in user interfaces. Proc. CHI, ACM (2006), 397--406.
[14]
Neumann, C., Metoyer, R. and Burnett, M. End-user strategy programming. J. Visual Languages and Computing, 20:1 (2009), 16--29.
[15]
Newell, A. and Card. S. The prospects for psychological science in human-computer interaction. HumanComputer Interaction, 1:3 (1985), 209--242.
[16]
Pane, J., Ratanamahatana, C. and Myers, B., Studying the language and structure in non-programmers' solutions to programming problems, Intl. J. HumanComputer Studies, 54:2 (2001) 237--264.
[17]
Pane, J., Myers, B., More Natural Programming Languages and Environments, In End User Development, vol. 9 of the Human-Computer Interaction Series, H. Lieberman, F. Paterno, V. Wulf, (Eds.). Springer (2006).
[18]
Pirolli, P., Card, S. Information foraging in information access environments. Proc CHI, ACM (1995), 51--58.
[19]
Segal, J. Some problems of professional end user developers. Proc. VLHCC, IEEE (2007), 111--118.
[20]
Tor, K., Ritter, F., Haynes, S. and Cohen, M., CaDaDis: A tool for displaying the behavior of cognitive models and agents. Proc. Conf. on Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation, (2004), 192--200.
[21]
Wong, J. and Hong, J. Making mashups with Marmite: Re-purposing web content through end-user programming. Proc. CHI, ACM (2007), 1435--1444.
[22]
Yaremko, R., Harari, H., Harrison, R., Lynn, E. Reference Handbook of Research and Statistical Methods in Psychology for Students and Professionals. Harper and Row (1982), New York.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CHI '12: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
May 2012
3276 pages
ISBN:9781450310154
DOI:10.1145/2207676
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 05 May 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. cognitive model
  2. end-user software engineering
  3. evaluation abstraction
  4. natural programming

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

CHI '12
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

CHI '25
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
April 26 - May 1, 2025
Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 322
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 19 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media