Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2207676.2208350acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

I did that! Measuring users' experience of agency in their own actions

Published: 05 May 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Cognitive neuroscience defines the sense of agency as the experience of controlling one's own actions and, through this control, affecting the external world. We believe that the sense of personal agency is a key factor in how people experience interactions with technology. This paper draws on theoretical perspectives in cognitive neuroscience and describes two implicit methods through which personal agency can be empirically investigated. We report two experiments applying these methods to HCI problems. One shows that a new input modality - skin-based interaction - can substantially increase users' sense of agency. The second demonstrates that variations in the parameters of assistance techniques such as predictive mouse acceleration can have a significant impact on users' sense of agency. The methods presented provide designers with new ways of evaluating and refining empowering interaction techniques and interfaces, in which users experience an instinctive sense of control and ownership over their actions.

References

[1]
Amento, B., Hill, W., & Terveen, L. The sound of one hand: a wrist-mounted bio-acoustic fingertip gesture interface. In Proc ACM CHI Extended Abstracts 2002, p.724--725.
[2]
Balakrishnan, R., "Beating" Fitts' law: virtual enhancements for pointing facilitation. Int Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2004. 66(6): p.857--874.
[3]
Bickmore, T. & Gruber, A., Relational Agents in Clinical Psychiatry. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 2010. 18(2).
[4]
Boone, G. Concept features in Re:Agent, an intelligent Email agent. In Proc 2nd Intl. Conf. on Autonomous Agents 1998.
[5]
Cassell, J., Sullivan, J., Prevost, S., & Churchill, E.F., eds. Embodied Conversational Agents. 2000, MIT Press.
[6]
Collins, H.M. & Kusch, M., The Shape of Actions: What Humans and Machines Can Do. 1998, MIT Press.
[7]
Coyle, D., Doherty, G., Matthews, M., & Sharry, J., Computers in Talk-Based Mental Health Interventions. Interacting with Computers, 2007. 19(4): p.545--62.
[8]
Crilly, N., Good, D., Matravers, D., & Clarkson, P., Design as communication: exploring the validity and utility of relating intention to interpretation. Design Studies, 2008. 29: p.425--57.
[9]
de Souza, C.S., The Semiotic Engineering of HumanComputer Interaction. 2005, Boston, MA: MIT Press.
[10]
Dehn, D.M., The impact of animated interface agents: a review of empirical research. International Journal of HumanComputer Studies, 2000. 52: p.1--22.
[11]
Dourish, P., Where The Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. 2001: MIT Press.
[12]
Ebert, J.P. & Wegner, D.M., Time Warp: authorship shapes the perceived timing of actions and events. Consciousness and Cognition, 2010. 19: p.481--89.
[13]
Engbert, K., Wohlschläger, A., Thomas, R., & Haggard, P., Agency, subjective time, and other minds. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 2007. 33(6): p.1261--8.
[14]
Fairclough, S.H., Fundamentals of physiological computing. Interacting with Computers, 2009. 21(1): p.133--145.
[15]
Farrer, C., Bouchereau, M., Jeannerod, M., & Franck, N., Effect of distorted visual feedback on the sense of agency. Behavioural Neurology, 2008. 19: p.53--57.
[16]
Frith, C.D., Blakemore, S.J., & Wolpert, D.M., Abnormalities in the awareness and control of action. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London -- B: Biological Sciences, 2000. 355: p.1771- 1788.
[17]
Gallagher, S., Multiple aspects of agency. New Ideas in Psychology, 2010. In press(Available online, March 2010).
[18]
Haggard, P., Clark, S., & Kalogeras, J., Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nature Neuroscience 2002. 5(4).
[19]
Haggard, P. & Tsakiris, M., The Experience of Agency: Feelings, Judgments, and Responsibility. Curr Dir Psychol Sci, 2009. 18(4): p.242--46.
[20]
Harrison, C., Tan, D., & Morris, D. Skinput: appropriating the body as an input surface. In Proc ACM CHI 2010, p.453--62.
[21]
Liberman, H. Autonomous Interface Agents. In Proc ACM CHI 1997, p.67--74.
[22]
Libet, B., Gleason, C.A., Wright, E.W., & Pearl, D.K., Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness potential): The unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. Brain, 1983. 106: p.623--642.
[23]
Mellor, C.S., First rank symptoms of schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry, 1970. 117: p.15--23.
[24]
Metcalfe, J., Eich, T.S., & Castel, A.D., Metacognition of agency across the lifespan. Cognition, 2010. 116: p.267--82.
[25]
Minnery, B.S. & Fine, M.S., Neuroscience and the Future of Human-Computer Interaction. Interactions, 2009. 16: p.70--75.
[26]
Moore, J. & Haggard, P., Awareness of action: inference and prediction. Consciousness and Cognition, 2008. p.136--144.
[27]
Moore, J.W., Lagnado, D., Deal, D.C., & Haggard, P., Feelings of Control: contigency determines experience of action. Cognition, 2009. 110: p.279--83.
[28]
Moore, J.W., Wegner, D.M., & Haggard, P., Modulating the sense of agency with external cues. Consciousness and Cognition, 2009. 18: p.1056--64.
[29]
Naas, C., Steuer, J., & Tauber, E. Computers are Social Actors. In Proc ACM CHI 1994, p.72--78.
[30]
Picard, R.W., Affective Computing. 1997: MIT Press.
[31]
Reeves, B. & Nass, C., The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media like Real People and Places. 1998: Cambridge University Press.
[32]
Rotter, J.B., Generalized expectancies of internal versus external control of reinforcements. Psychological Monographs, 1966. 80(609).
[33]
Shneiderman, B. & Plaisant, C., Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. 4th ed. 2004: Pearson Education.
[34]
Suchman, L., Human-Machine Reconfigurations. 2007: Cambridge University Press.
[35]
Synofzik, M., Vosgerau, G., & Newen, A., Beyond the comparator model: a multifactorial two-step account of agency. Consciousness and Cognition, 2008. 17: p.219--39.
[36]
Wegner, D, The Illusion of Conscious Will. 2002 MIT Press.
[37]
Wegner, D., The mind's best trick: how we experience conscious will. Trends in Cog Science, 2003. 7(2): p.65--69.
[38]
Wegner, D. & Wheatley, T., Apparent Mental Causation: Sources of the Experience of Will. American Psychologist, 1999. 54(7): p.480--92.
[39]
Williamson, J., Murray-Smith, R., Blankertz, B., Krauledat, M., & Muller, K.R., Designing for uncertain, asymmetric control: Interaction design for brain-computer interfaces. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, 2009. 67: p.827--41.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The effect of electrical muscle stimulation on intentional binding and explicit sense of agencyPeerJ10.7717/peerj.1797712(e17977)Online publication date: 19-Sep-2024
  • (2024)The Sense of Agency in the Use of AI by Filmmakers: The Scenario Planning Stage in Pre-ProductionArchives of Design Research10.15187/adr.2024.07.37.3.13537:3(135-149)Online publication date: 31-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Investigating Creation Perspectives and Icon Placement Preferences for On-Body Menus in Virtual RealityProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36981368:ISS(236-254)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. I did that! Measuring users' experience of agency in their own actions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI '12: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    May 2012
    3276 pages
    ISBN:9781450310154
    DOI:10.1145/2207676
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 05 May 2012

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. \ cognitive science
    2. \ evaluation methods
    3. \ experience of agency
    4. \ implicit measures
    5. personal agency

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CHI '12
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

    Upcoming Conference

    CHI '25
    CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 26 - May 1, 2025
    Yokohama , Japan

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)260
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)31
    Reflects downloads up to 21 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)The effect of electrical muscle stimulation on intentional binding and explicit sense of agencyPeerJ10.7717/peerj.1797712(e17977)Online publication date: 19-Sep-2024
    • (2024)The Sense of Agency in the Use of AI by Filmmakers: The Scenario Planning Stage in Pre-ProductionArchives of Design Research10.15187/adr.2024.07.37.3.13537:3(135-149)Online publication date: 31-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Investigating Creation Perspectives and Icon Placement Preferences for On-Body Menus in Virtual RealityProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36981368:ISS(236-254)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2024
    • (2024)Immersive Analytics: The Influence of Flow, Sense of Agency, and Presence on Performance and SatisfactionProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36611448:EICS(1-27)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Who did it? How User Agency is influenced by Visual Properties of Generated ImagesProceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3654777.3676335(1-17)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
    • (2024)Examining Algorithmic Metrics and their Effects through the Lens of ReactivityProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3660676(3179-3192)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Mid-Air Haptic Feedback Improves Implicit Agency and Trust in Gesture-Based Automotive Infotainment Systems: a Driving Simulator StudyProceedings of the 16th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3640792.3676882(116-124)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2024
    • (2024)Outperformed by AI: Interacting with Superhuman AI Changes the Way We Perceive OurselvesExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650961(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)“I finally felt I had the tools to control these urges”: Empowering Students to Achieve Their Device Use Goals With the Reduce Digital Distraction WorkshopProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642946(1-23)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Better to Ask Than Assume: Proactive Voice Assistants’ Communication Strategies That Respect User Agency in a Smart Home EnvironmentProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642193(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media