Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2245276.2245411acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Process-aware continuation management in web applications

Published: 26 March 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Web applications are subject to an interaction challenge not found in other user interfaces: In addition to the widgets that web pages are built of, browsers provide further navigation features such as the Back and Forward buttons that are beyond the developer's control. Continuations have been suggested as a means to cope with the arbitrary navigation patterns that users may perform using these features. While an elegant solution in theory, continuations can incur a significant memory load in practice, and may offer more navigation options than business requirements mandate. We therefore propose a dialog control logic that augments the continuation approach with strategies for automatic elimination of continuations that will likely not be needed anymore, or whose invocation shall be prevented due to business requirements. This way, we aim to realize the benefits that continuations can provide to web applications, while ameliorating the drawbacks that they exhibit in practice.

References

[1]
Apache Software Foundation. Apache Cocoon. http://cocoon.apache.org.
[2]
L. Baresi, G. Denaro, L. Mainetti, and P. Paolini. Assertions to better specify the amazon bug. In Proc. 14th Intl. Conf. on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE 2002), pages 585--592. ACM, 2002.
[3]
M. Book and V. Gruhn. Modeling web-based dialog flows for automatic dialog control. In Proc. 19th IEEE Intl. Conf. on Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2004), pages 100--109. IEEE Computer Society, 2004.
[4]
L. D. Catledge and J. E. Pitkow. Characterizing browsing strategies in the world-wide web. Comput. Netw. ISDN Syst., 27(6): 1065--1073, 1995.
[5]
S. Ducasse, A. Lienhard, and L. Renggli. Seaside -- a multiple control flow web application framework. In Proc. 12th Intl. Smalltalk Conference (ISC 2004), pages 231--257, September 2004.
[6]
J. Hughes. Generalising monads to arrows. Sci. Comput. Program., 37(1--3): 67--111, 2000.
[7]
D. R. Licata and S. Krishnamurthi. Verifying interactive web programs. In Proc. 19th IEEE Intl. Conf. on Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2004), pages 164--173. IEEE Computer Society, 2004.
[8]
C. Queinnec. The influence of browsers on evaluators or, continuations to program web servers. In Proc. 5th ACM SIGPLAN Intl. Conf. on Functional Programming (ICFP 2000), pages 23--33. ACM, 2000.
[9]
Red Hat Middleware. Seam Framework. http://www.seamframework.org.
[10]
H. Shubin and M. M. Meehan. Navigation in web applications. interactions, 4(6): 13--17, 1997.
[11]
SpringSource. Spring Web Flow. http://www.springframework.org/webflow.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SAC '12: Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
March 2012
2179 pages
ISBN:9781450308571
DOI:10.1145/2245276
  • Conference Chairs:
  • Sascha Ossowski,
  • Paola Lecca
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 March 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. continuations
  2. navigation
  3. web engineering

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

SAC 2012
Sponsor:
SAC 2012: ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
March 26 - 30, 2012
Trento, Italy

Acceptance Rates

SAC '12 Paper Acceptance Rate 270 of 1,056 submissions, 26%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,650 of 6,669 submissions, 25%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 132
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 16 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media