Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/2020408.2020573acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Diversified ranking on large graphs: an optimization viewpoint

Published: 21 August 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Diversified ranking on graphs is a fundamental mining task and has a variety of high-impact applications. There are two important open questions here. The first challenge is the measure - how to quantify the goodness of a given top-k ranking list that captures both the relevance and the diversity? The second challenge lies in the algorithmic aspect - how to find an optimal, or near-optimal, top-k ranking list that maximizes the measure we defined in a scalable way? In this paper, we address these challenges from an optimization point of view. Firstly, we propose a goodness measure for a given top-k ranking list. The proposed goodness measure intuitively captures both (a) the relevance between each individual node in the ranking list and the query; and (b) the diversity among different nodes in the ranking list. Moreover, we propose a scalable algorithm (linear wrt the size of the graph) that generates a provably near-optimal solution. The experimental evaluations on real graphs demonstrate its effectiveness and efficiency.

References

[1]
C. L. 0001, F. Guo, and C. Faloutsos. Bbm: bayesian browsing model from petabyte-scale data. In KDD, pages 537--546, 2009.
[2]
D. Agarwal, A. Z. Broder, D. Chakrabarti, D. Diklic, V. Josifovski, and M. Sayyadian. Estimating rates of rare events at multiple resolutions. In KDD, pages 16--25, 2007.
[3]
A. Angel, S. Chaudhuri, G. Das, and N. Koudas. Ranking objects based on relationships and fixed associations. In EDBT'09, pages 910--921, 2009.
[4]
L. Backstrom and J. Leskovec. Supervised random walks: predicting and recommending links in social networks. In WSDM, pages 635--644, 2011.
[5]
A. Broder, R. Kumar, F. Maghoul1, P. Raghavan, S. Rajagopalan, R. Stata, A. Tomkins, and J. Wiener. Graph structure in the web: experiments and models. In WWW Conf., 2000.
[6]
J. G. Carbonell and J. Goldstein. The use of mmr, diversity-based reranking for reordering documents and producing summaries. In SIGIR, pages 335--336, 1998.
[7]
K. El-Arini, G. Veda, D. Shahaf, and C. Guestrin. Turning down the noise in the blogosphere. In KDD, pages 289--298, 2009.
[8]
Y. Ge, H. Xiong, A. Tuzhilin, K. Xiao, M. Gruteser, and M. J. Pazzani. An energy-efficient mobile recommender system. In KDD, pages 899--908, 2010.
[9]
F. Geerts, H. Mannila, and E. Terzi. Relational link-based ranking. In VLDB, pages 552--563, 2004.
[10]
G. H. Golub and C. F. V. Loan. Matrix Perturbation Theory. The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.
[11]
T. H. Haveliwala. Topic-sensitive pagerank. WWW, pages 517--526, 2002.
[12]
D. Heckerman, D. M. Chickering, C. Meek, R. Rounthwaite, and C. M. Kadie. Dependency networks for collaborative filtering and data visualization. In UAI, pages 264--273, 2000.
[13]
U. Kang, C. E. Tsourakakis, and C. Faloutsos. Pegasus: A peta-scale graph mining system. In ICDM, pages 229--238, 2009.
[14]
G. Karypis and V. Kumar. Multilevel -way hypergraph partitioning. In DAC, pages 343--348, 1999.
[15]
J. M. Kleinberg. Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. J. ACM, 46(5):604--632, 1999.
[16]
Y. Koren. Collaborative filtering with temporal dynamics. In KDD, pages 447--456, 2009.
[17]
Y. Koren, S. C. North, and C. Volinsky. Measuring and extracting proximity in networks. In KDD, pages 245--255, 2006.
[18]
A. Krause and C. Guestrin. Beyond convexity - submodularity in machine learning. In ICML, 2008.
[19]
T. Lappas, K. Liu, and E. Terzi. Finding a team of experts in social networks. In KDD, pages 467--476, 2009.
[20]
J. Leskovec, A. Krause, C. Guestrin, C. Faloutsos, J. M. VanBriesen, and N. S. Glance. Cost-effective outbreak detection in networks. In KDD, pages 420--429, 2007.
[21]
L. Li, K. Zhou, G.-R. Xue, H. Zha, and Y. Yu. Enhancing diversity, coverage and balance for summarization through structure learning. In WWW, pages 71--80, 2009.
[22]
P. Li, H. Liu, J. X. Yu, J. He, and X. Du. Fast single-pair simrank computation. In SDM, pages 571--582, 2010.
[23]
D. Liben-Nowell and J. Kleinberg. The link prediction problem for social networks. In Proc. CIKM, 2003.
[24]
R. Lichtenwalter, J. T. Lussier, and N. V. Chawla. New perspectives and methods in link prediction. In KDD, pages 243--252, 2010.
[25]
A. S. Maiya and T. Y. Berger-Wolf. Sampling community structure. In WWW, pages 701--710, 2010.
[26]
H. Maserrat and J. Pei. Neighbor query friendly compression of social networks. In KDD, pages 533--542, 2010.
[27]
Q. Mei, J. Guo, and D. R. Radev. Divrank: the interplay of prestige and diversity in information networks. In KDD, pages 1009--1018, 2010.
[28]
J. Neville, B. Gallagher, and T. Eliassi-Rad. Evaluating statistical tests for within-network classifiers of relational data. In ICDM, pages 397--406, 2009.
[29]
C. C. Noble and D. J. Cook. Graph-based anomaly detection. In KDD, pages 631--636, 2003.
[30]
L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd. The PageRank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Technical report, Stanford Digital Library Technologies Project, 1998. Paper SIDL-WP-1999-0120 (version of 11/11/1999).
[31]
R. Pemantle. Vertex reinforced random walk. Prob. Th. and Rel. Fields, pages 117--136, 1992.
[32]
F. Radlinski, P. N. Bennett, B. Carterette, and T. Joachims. Redundancy, diversity and interdependent document relevance. SIGIR Forum, 43(2):46--52, 2009.
[33]
P. Sarkar and A. W. Moore. Fast nearest-neighbor search in disk-resident graphs. In KDD, pages 513--522, 2010.
[34]
V. Satuluri and S. Parthasarathy. Scalable graph clustering using stochastic flows: applications to community discovery. In KDD, pages 737--746, 2009.
[35]
H. Shan and A. Banerjee. Generalized probabilistic matrix factorizations for collaborative filtering. In ICDM, pages 1025--1030, 2010.
[36]
C. Tan, J. Tang, J. Sun, Q. Lin, and F. Wang. Social action tracking via noise tolerant time-varying factor graphs. In KDD, pages 1049--1058, 2010.
[37]
H. Tong, C. Faloutsos, and J.-Y. Pan. Fast random walk with restart and its applications. In ICDM, pages 613--622, 2006.
[38]
L. Wu. Social network effects on performance and layoffs: Evidence from the adoption of a social networking tool. Job Market Paper, 2011.
[39]
D. Xin, J. Han, X. Yan, and H. Cheng. Mining compressed frequent-pattern sets. In VLDB, pages 709--720, 2005.
[40]
X. Yin, J. Han, and P. S. Yu. Cross-relational clustering with user guidance. In KDD, pages 344--353, 2005.
[41]
Y. Yue and T. Joachims. Predicting diverse subsets using structural svms. In ICML, pages 1224--1231, 2008.
[42]
X. Zhu, A. B. Goldberg, J. V. Gael, and D. Andrzejewski. Improving diversity in ranking using absorbing random walks. In HLT-NAACL, pages 97--104, 2007.
[43]
C.-N. Ziegler, S. M. McNee, J. A. Konstan, and G. Lausen. Improving recommendation lists through topic diversification. In WWW, pages 22--32, 2005.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Provable randomized rounding for minimum-similarity diversificationData Mining and Knowledge Discovery10.1007/s10618-021-00811-236:2(709-738)Online publication date: 4-Jan-2022
  • (2020)Serendipity-based Points-of-Interest NavigationACM Transactions on Internet Technology10.1145/339119720:4(1-32)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2020
  • (2020)Testing the impact of semantics and structure on recommendation accuracy and diversityProceedings of the 12th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining10.1109/ASONAM49781.2020.9381334(250-257)Online publication date: 7-Dec-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Diversified ranking on large graphs: an optimization viewpoint

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    KDD '11: Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
    August 2011
    1446 pages
    ISBN:9781450308137
    DOI:10.1145/2020408
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 21 August 2011

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. diversity
    2. graph mining
    3. ranking
    4. scalability

    Qualifiers

    • Poster

    Conference

    KDD '11
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,133 of 8,635 submissions, 13%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 20 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2022)Provable randomized rounding for minimum-similarity diversificationData Mining and Knowledge Discovery10.1007/s10618-021-00811-236:2(709-738)Online publication date: 4-Jan-2022
    • (2020)Serendipity-based Points-of-Interest NavigationACM Transactions on Internet Technology10.1145/339119720:4(1-32)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2020
    • (2020)Testing the impact of semantics and structure on recommendation accuracy and diversityProceedings of the 12th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining10.1109/ASONAM49781.2020.9381334(250-257)Online publication date: 7-Dec-2020
    • (2019)Does Diversity Affect User Satisfaction in Image SearchACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/332011837:3(1-30)Online publication date: 8-May-2019
    • (2019)CrowdTravel: Leveraging Cross-Modal CrowdSourced Data for Fine-Grained and Context-Based Travel Route Recommendation2019 IEEE SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing, Advanced & Trusted Computing, Scalable Computing & Communications, Cloud & Big Data Computing, Internet of People and Smart City Innovation (SmartWorld/SCALCOM/UIC/ATC/CBDCom/IOP/SCI)10.1109/SmartWorld-UIC-ATC-SCALCOM-IOP-SCI.2019.00175(851-858)Online publication date: Aug-2019
    • (2019)Online Social Media Recommendation Over Streams2019 IEEE 35th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)10.1109/ICDE.2019.00088(938-949)Online publication date: Apr-2019
    • (2019)Semi-supervised Classification-based Local Vertex Ranking via Dual Generative Adversarial Nets2019 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data)10.1109/BigData47090.2019.9005595(1267-1273)Online publication date: Dec-2019
    • (2019)Diversity in Machine LearningIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2019.29176207(64323-64350)Online publication date: 2019
    • (2018)Fusing Diversity in Recommendations in Heterogeneous Information NetworksProceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining10.1145/3159652.3159720(414-422)Online publication date: 2-Feb-2018
    • (2018)DivGroup: A Diversified Approach to Divide Collection of Patterns into Uniform Groups2018 24th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR)10.1109/ICPR.2018.8546203(964-969)Online publication date: Aug-2018
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media